ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(501) PANDITI BUJJI Vs. ALURI NARAYANA RAO AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Motor Accident Compensation — Enhancement of Compensation — The petitioner was injured in an auto accident — She claimed compensation for her injuries — Whether the accident was caused by the rash and negligent driving of the auto driver and whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation — The petitioner argued that the accident was due to the negligence of the auto driver and that she suffered 10% permanent disability, affecting her ability to work — The insurance company contended
India Law Library Docid # 2416545

(502) G. AMRUTHA RAO Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Sections 125 and 127 — Alteration in allowance — The husband, a retired Assistant Commandant, sought to reduce the monthly maintenance allowance to his wife, citing reduced income post-retirement — Whether the change in circumstances due to the husband's retirement justifies altering the maintenance allowance — The husband argued that his pension is significantly lower than his previous salary, making it difficult to maintain the current maintenance payment
India Law Library Docid # 2416546

(503) M/S. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED Vs. VEDULA CHIRANJEEVI (DIED) AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Lease — Validity of lease extension, entitlement to possession, and damages — The plaintiff leased land to a company which later became HPCL — The lease expired, and the plaintiff sought possession and damages — Petitioner argues that the lease expired, HPCL failed to vacate despite notices, and sought possession and damages — Respondents Arguments — Lease extended by statutory option, continued possession justified, and suit barred by limitation — Trial court decreed possession to the plaintiff
India Law Library Docid # 2416547

(504) SANJEEV HANS Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS[PATNA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 323, 341, 376, 376-D, 420, 313, 120-B, 504, 506/34 — Information Technology Act, 2000 — Section 67 — The petitioner seeks to quash an FIR registered under various sections of the IPC and IT Act — The complainant alleges rape and other offences — Whether the FIR should be quashed due to procedural lapses and lack of evidence — The petitioner argues that the complaint was filed after a significant delay without satisfactory explanation, and that the complainant di
India Law Library Docid # 2416548

(505) MOST. PANCHOLA @ PARMILA DEVI Vs. SRI KRISHNA KUMAR[PATNA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — The plaintiff purchased the suit property from ‘G’ who had bought it through a registered sale deed — The defendant, ‘G’s daughter-in-law, claimed the property was bought with joint family funds and she was a co-sharer — Whether the property was ‘G’ exclusive property or joint family property, and the validity of the award claimed by the defendant — The trial court and appellate court both ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring
India Law Library Docid # 2416549

(506) SRI PRAVEEN ANAND Vs. THE ASST. GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER[PATNA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Recovery of the Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 — Section 19(25) — The Tribunal may made such orders and give such directions as may be necessary or expedient to give effect to its orders or to prevent abuse of its process or to secure the ends of justice — The appellant is challenging the proceedings initiated by the State Bank of India (SBI) and the order of the Lok Adalat before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) — The main issue is whether the DRT had jurisdiction to interfere with the Lok Ada
India Law Library Docid # 2416550

(507) SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. RADHA DEVI AND OTHERS[PATNA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 — Section 147 — Accidental Death — Gratuitous passenger — Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation and the quantum of compensation — Petitioner argue that the deceased was a gratuitous passenger, and the tractor was used for commercial purposes — Respondent claims that the deceased was a cleaner, not a gratuitous passenger, and the insurance policy covered the risk — The appeal was dismissed, and the insurance company was directed to pay the compensatio
India Law Library Docid # 2416551

(508) RUDHRA KAPOOR Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 — Advanced liver cirrhosis — The petitioner seeks permission to donate his liver graft to his father, who suffers from advanced liver cirrhosis — The main issue is whether the petitioner, a minor, can donate his liver graft under the Act, 1994 — The petitioner approached the Authorization Committee of B.L. Kapur Memorial Hospital but was informed that organ donation is not allowed for minors — The respondents argue that an Authorization Commi
India Law Library Docid # 2416566

(509) DEVRA GRIVIN DILIPBHAI AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 420, 383, 384, 466, 468, 470, 471, 506, 120-B and 201 — Information Technology Act, 2000 —Sections 66C and 66D —Financial fraud involving cybercrime — Bail —Whether the petitioners should be granted bail despite the serious allegations of financial fraud — Petitioner argue that the investigation is complete, charges are framed, and the parties have resolved their disputes — The petitioners have no criminal history and have been in custody for a significant peri
India Law Library Docid # 2416579

(510) STATE OF HARYANA Vs. MANPREET SINGH AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Respondents were apprehended with 130 bottles of Rexcof — The initial forensic report did not mention the presence of Codeine — Whether the second sample should be sent for retesting to CFSL, Chandigarh — Petitioner argues that the second sample should be tested due to ambiguity in the first report —State contends that there is no provision under the NDPS Act allows for retesting; no compelling circumstances were shown — The petition to send
India Law Library Docid # 2416580

(511) NARENDER Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 195A, 120B, 180, 506 and 34 — Threatening any person to give false evidence — Quashing of FIR — Whether the FIR against the petitioner should be quashed based on the allegations and the legal provisions involved — The petitioner claims false implication due to a family business dispute and argues that the allegations are baseless and do not constitute an offence under Section 195-A of IPC — The state and the complainant oppose the quashing, asserting the serious
India Law Library Docid # 2416581

(512) RANJIT SINGH @ BUCHA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 22 and 29 — The petitioner was found in possession of 1015 intoxicant capsules containing Tramadol Hydrochloride, exceeding the commercial quantity limit — Bail — The petitioner has been in custody for over a year, with no prior convictions under the NDPS Act, and no evidence tampering concerns —The petitioner was granted bail, considering the time already spent in custody and the lack of prior convictions — The court referenced sim
India Law Library Docid # 2416582

(513) JEYACHANDRAN AND OTHERS Vs. ROSAMMAL (DIED) AND OTHERS[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Property Dispute — Property dispute centered on the religious identity of the deceased ‘K’, whose heirs are the appellants and respondents — The respondents claimed ‘K’ was Christian, allowing for specific property transactions, while the appellants insisted he was Hindu — The court examined documents like sale deeds indicating Christian affiliation and found that while the gift deed (Exhibit A5) to the first plaintiff was valid, the oral surrender and subsequent sale deed (Exhibit A3) were not
India Law Library Docid # 2416675

(514) ASHOK KUMAR Vs. AMSU AND ANOTHER[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 21 Rule 97 — The case revolves around a dispute over a property — The plaintiff had filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement, and the defendant had entered appearance in the suit — However, the defendant later sold the property to a third party, who later filed an application under Order 21 Rule 97 of C.P.C. to set aside the decree — The court held that the third party was a pendente lite purchaser and was not entitled to file an applica
India Law Library Docid # 2416676

(515) SHRI SANTHOSH SHET Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 376 and 506 — Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Sections 6 and 15 — Information Technology Act, 2000 — Section 66 — The petitioner, a tuition teacher, is accused of raping a student and recording the act – The video surfaced years later, leading to charges under various sections of the IPC, POCSO Act, and IT Act — The admissibility of a CD containing the video evidence without a proper Section 65-B certificate under the Indian Evidence Act
India Law Library Docid # 2417033

(516) SRI SREERAMU V. AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 304A — The petitioners, BESCOM officers, are accused of negligence leading to the electrocution deaths of a woman and her child due to a live wire on the street — Whether the petitioners can be held responsible for negligence under Section 304A of the IPC — The petitioners argue they are not responsible for wire maintenance and cite a report absolving them of wrongdoing — The State argues that the matter requires investigation to determine responsibility — The co
India Law Library Docid # 2417034

(517) SRI DEBASHISH SINHA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 149, 304 and 304A — The case involves the death of a 9-year-old girl who drowned in a swimming pool — The petitioners are members of the Home Owners Association, accused of negligence — Whether the petitioners are liable under Sections 304 and 149 — The petitioners argued there was no intention to commit homicide, and the delay in filing the complaint indicates a lack of culpability — The respondents contended that the petitioners were responsible for the neglig
India Law Library Docid # 2417035

(518) MR.ANSARI SABLU HAIDARALI Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 420 — Information Technology Act, 2000 — Sections 66C and 66D — The petitioner is a businessman whose bank account was frozen due to suspicion of involvement in an online fraud case — The complainant Rupa, alleged that she was defrauded of over Rs. 2.28 crores through various accounts, including the petitioner's — Whether the petitioner's bank account should be de-frozen and whether the debit freeze order was valid despite not being immediately reported to the Ma
India Law Library Docid # 2417036

(519) PATEL ENGINEERING LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 406, 420 and 506(2) — Petitioners are involved in a dispute over property development and financial transactions — The company mortgaged properties and faced SARFAESI proceedings — The main issue is whether the dispute is purely commercial or involves criminal elements under Sections 406, 420, and 506(2) of the IPC — The petitioners argue that the dispute is a commercial transaction being wrongly projected as a crime, and the complaint lacks the necessary ingred
India Law Library Docid # 2417037

(520) SRI. SHAILESH KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. SMT. NISHA S. KUMAR AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 06-08-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 406, 420 and 465 — The case involves allegations of forgery and cheating — The dispute centers around forged signatures and fraudulent transactions — Whether the rejection of the 'B' report and taking cognizance of the offence by the trial court was in accordance with the law — The petitioners argued that the complainant's signatures were not forged and that the 'B' report filed by the police was correct — The respondent contended that her signatures were forged
India Law Library Docid # 2417038