ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(401) SHRI ONGDI SHERPA Vs. SHRI NIM TEMBA SHERPA AND OTHERS[SIKKIM HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Substantial Question of Law — Court Witness Evidence — Whether the learned First Appellate Court by ignoring material evidence given by Court Witness No.1, Surja Maya Sunwar, endorsed the finding of the Learned Trial Court?
India Law Library Docid # 2433410

(402) CHANDRASHEKHAR AND OTHERS Vs. GANGAVVA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 25-09-2025
Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 — Sections 4, 21, 24 — Tenancy rights — Will — Bequest of tenanted land — Land vested with the government — Occupancy rights granted to tenant — Whether a bequest under a Will is an assignment and barred by Section 21 — Held, Section 21 must be read with Section 24 — Bests are
India Law Library Docid # 2433698

(403) M/S SPAZECLUB PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S VENUS COTSPIN PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 15 Rule 5 — Striking off defence for failure to deposit admitted rent — Provisions require defendant to deposit admitted rent and monthly amount due throughout the continuation of the suit — Failure to do so may lead to striking off defence — Commercial Court correctly applied this rule.
India Law Library Docid # 2433922

(404) BEANT KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. SHREE SANATAN DHARAM SABHA (REGD.)[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 — Section 13 — Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997 — Section 12 — Jurisdiction of Rent Tribunal — Bar of Jurisdiction — Petitioners contending that eviction petition under Act of 1949 is not maintainable as jurisdiction is barred by Act
India Law Library Docid # 2433923

(405) GURNEK SINGH Vs. BALBIR SINGH[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Condonation of delay — Appeal filed with a delay of 4 days — Application for condonation of delay allowed, reasons mentioned in the application supported by affidavit.
India Law Library Docid # 2433934

(406) BALJINDERPAL SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. INDERJIT KAUR OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Civil Procedure — Suit for possession — Maintainability — Plaintiff's suit for possession was dismissed as defendant's possession was based on a Consent Decree that was never challenged by the plaintiffs. Held, suit for possession without challenging the decree is not maintainable.
India Law Library Docid # 2433935

(407) THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, PUNJAB AND OTHERS Vs. VARINDER KUMAR JAIN[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Condonation of delay — Not a matter of generosity or benevolence, but requires sufficient cause — Pursuit of substantial justice cannot prejudice the opposite party — Law of limitation is substantive, not merely technical, and promotes finality in litigation.
India Law Library Docid # 2433936

(408) RATTAN SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR Vs. MANGE RAM AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Land Revenue Act / Punjab Courts Act — Right of Pre-emption — Co-ownership — The appellant claimed to be a co-owner before the sale, thus preventing the respondent's right of pre-emption. The lower courts ruled against this, but the High Court found that the appellant was indeed a co-owner based on earlier land records. The bifurcation of land records in a later Jamabandi was found to be erroneous, and
India Law Library Docid # 2433937

(409) COL. AMARDEEP SINGH (RETD.) Vs. ANUPAMDEEP KAUR AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Section 63 — Execution of Will — Attestation — Critical for a Will to be validly attested by two or more witnesses, each of whom must have seen the testator sign or affix their mark, or seen another person sign on the testator's behalf in their presence and by their direction. Witness must also sign in the testator's presence. In this case, one attesting witness's statement that he signed
India Law Library Docid # 2433938

(410) GURMEL SINGH Vs. BHOLA SINQH ALIAS SUKHDEV SINQH AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 58(c) — Mortgage by conditional sale — Ingredients — Transaction is a mortgage by conditional sale if there is an ostensible sale, a condition that on default of payment the sale shall become absolute or on payment the sale shall become void or the buyer shall retransfer, and this condition is embodied in the same document as the sale — Held, the document in
India Law Library Docid # 2433980

(411) SMT. NIRMALA MEENA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Sections 13(1)(c)(d), 13(2), 13(1)(e) and IPC, 1860 — Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 109 — Prosecution Sanction — Challenge to — Petitioner sought quashing of order granting prosecution sanction — Allegations of misappropriation of wheat and disproportionate assets — Previous departmental inquiry recommended exoneration — Another FIR resulted in a negative final report
India Law Library Docid # 2433981

(412) JEEVARAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 173(8) — Further Investigation — Charge-sheet was filed wherein investigation against the driver of a white swift car was kept pending under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. — This indicated that the investigation was not complete — Trial court erred in making adverse observations and directing inquiry against Investigating Officer for alleged wilful negligence and
India Law Library Docid # 2433982

(413) BHARAT SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 14, Article 16(1) — Equality before law, Right to equality of opportunity — Writ petition challenging amendment to Rajasthan Public Service Commission (Ministerial and Subordinate Services) Rules, 1999, specifically Rule 6A concerning compassionate appointment for dependents of armed force personnel — Petitioner sought appointment based on grandfather's death in
India Law Library Docid # 2433983

(414) MUKHRAM SWAMI Vs. REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 2001 — Section 57(1) — Surcharge proceedings — Delay in initiation — Petitioner challenged proceedings initiated under Section 57(1) of the Act of 2001 alleging embezzlement in 2009-2010, arguing that the proceedings were time-barred as Section 57 provides a six-year limitation period for inquiry from the date of the act or omission, or two years from the date of
India Law Library Docid # 2433984

(415) LRS OF PURAKH SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. NARENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 173 — Appeal against award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal — Appeal filed under Section 173 challenging the award partly allowing the claim petition and awarding compensation — Appeal concerning calculation of compensation for a homemaker deceased in a road accident.
India Law Library Docid # 2433985

(416) HIRALAL AND OTHERS Vs. SMT BIDAMI DEVI AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 — Sections 9, 22, Rule 20(2)(i) — Maintenance and eviction — Senior citizen's application for maintenance and possession of residential house and shop allowed by SDO, upheld by District Magistrate — Petitioners challenged eviction from shop — Court found property to be self-acquired of senior citizen — SDO had jurisdiction to order
India Law Library Docid # 2434040

(417) XXX Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 — Section 3(2B) — Termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks — Allowed only if Medical Board diagnoses substantial foetal abnormalities, incompatible with life or leading to severe handicap, and procedure is safe for the woman.
India Law Library Docid # 2434041

(418) RAVINDER KUMAR PESHIN Vs. JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD. AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 25-09-2025
Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. Officers Recruitment, Discipline, Conduct and Appeal Rules, 2000 — Rules 365, 372, 376, 377, 383, 384, 385, 390, 402, 402(c)(ii), 404-A — Disciplinary proceedings — Minor penalty — Major penalty — Appeal — Scope of appellate authority — Decision to initiate proceedings for minor or major penalty rests with the Disciplinary Authority, not the Appellate Authority, at the initial stage — However, the Appellate Authority, under Rule 402, has the power to
India Law Library Docid # 2434115

(419) NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. POOJA DEVI AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 25-09-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 149(1) and Supreme Court rulings — Liability of insurer for accidents involving vehicles carrying more passengers than permitted — Insurer must first deposit the total awarded compensation and can then recover amounts paid for excess passengers from the vehicle owner.
India Law Library Docid # 2434116

(420) RIYAZ MAHMAD HUSSAIN MERCHANT Vs. BHAVNABEN RASIKLAL VANIYA AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 10 and Order 8 Rule 6A — Return of plaint for counter-claim — A counter-claim filed by a defendant is maintainable even if it pertains to a property different from the suit property, provided it is based on a cause of action that accrued to the defendant. The purpose of allowing counter-claims is to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and to resolve all disputes between
India Law Library Docid # 2434160