India Law Library

User not Logged..

Law Books shopping cart Launched! - Big Offers & Huge Discounts - All Law Books at One Place — Limited Time Deals!!

Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer

Latest Cases

First
«
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
»
Last

(341) SMT. MAHASHWETA HALDER Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 14-01-2026
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 54 — Sale — Definition — A sale is a transfer of ownership in exchange for a price paid or promised — In the present case, the offer to sell was made by the respondent, accepted by the petitioner's parents, and the entire consideration money was paid — This constitutes a contract, and the respondent failed to perform their part by executing the sale deed.
India Law Library Docid # 2438736

(342) SUBHADIP BOSE AND OTHERS Vs. LA COLLECTOR, HOOGHLY, CHINSURAH[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 14-01-2026
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Re-settlement Act, 2013 — Application of 2013 Act — Proceedings initiated under 1894 Act but no award passed before 2013 Act came into force — Compensation determination to be under 2013 Act as per Section 24(1)(a) — 1894 Act stood repealed.
India Law Library Docid # 2438777

(343) M/S. MARION BIOTECH PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 14-01-2026
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 — Sections 18(a)(i), 16, 17-A, 17-B, 18-A, 18-B, 27(a), 27(b)(i), 27(b)(ii), 27(c), 27(d), 28, 28-A, 28-B and 34 — Cognizance and summoning order — Allegations of manufacturing and sale of "not of standard quality" drugs, adulterated and spurious drugs, and procedural non-compliance — Revision
India Law Library Docid # 2438852

(344) UMME FARVA Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 14-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 155 and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 174 — Non-cognizable offence — Registration of FIR — Illegal — If an offence is non-cognizable, an NCR should be registered, not an FIR, and investigation requires a Magistrate's order. Treating a non-cognizable offence as
India Law Library Docid # 2438853

(345) VICTIM X Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (LUCKNOW BENCH)] 14-01-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ Petition — Aggrieved by inaction of respondent authorities in providing compensation under 'Uttar Pradesh Rani Lakshmi Bai Mahila Samman Kosh Rules, 2015' — Petitioner's claim that victim was sexually assaulted, FIR lodged, and charge sheet filed as per Section 4 of POCSO Act — Scheme
India Law Library Docid # 2438854

(346) SUNIL SHANKAR MOHITE Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR)] 14-01-2026
Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Package — Insurance Scheme for Health Workers Fighting Covid-19 — Eligibility — Requirement of Hospital Requisitioned for Covid-19 Treatment — Held, the scheme does not stipulate that the hospital where the deceased was working must have been requisitioned for COVID-19 treatment. The benevolent intent of the scheme is to cover health workers who contracted COVID-19 while on duty.
India Law Library Docid # 2439016

(347) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs. NEELESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 14-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 498-A, 304-B, 306/34 — Dowry Death, Cruelty, Abetment to Suicide — Acquittal by Trial Court — Appeal by State — Death of deceased within unnatural circumstances within seven years of marriage — Presumption under Section 113-B of Indian Evidence Act — Essential ingredients of Section 304-B
India Law Library Docid # 2439080

(348) RAVI JOSHI Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 14-01-2026
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) — Section 14 — Application for assistance in taking possession — Maintainability of repeated application — A repeated application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act is maintainable if justified by reasonable grounds.
India Law Library Docid # 2439089

(349) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs. PURUSHOTTAM @ GUDDA[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 14-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 304-B, 498-A, 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act — Appeal against acquittal — Presumption of dowry death under Section 304-B IPC requires unnatural death under circumstances of dowry demand and cruelty — Prosecution failed to establish demand for dowry and related harassment leading to
India Law Library Docid # 2439090

(350) SMT. RANJANA CHOUKSEY ALIAS SHRIM CHOUKSEY Vs. VAIBHAV RAI[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 14-01-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 24 — Transfer of case — Grounds for transfer — Wife seeking transfer of divorce proceedings from Gadarwara to Narmadapuram — Wife's residence in Narmadapuram and distance of 150 Kms creating hardship, especially with an infant child — Husband willing to pay travel and stay expenses — Courts now consider convenience but not as the sole factor — If evidence
India Law Library Docid # 2439091

(351) TRILOKA DEVI @ TILOKA DEVI Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 14-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 385 — Extortion by putting in fear of injury — Unchallenged testimony of the victim regarding demand for money and threat of injury with a stone is sufficient to constitute the offence.
India Law Library Docid # 2439414

(352) INDER SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 13-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 148, 302, 149, 307, 149, 323, 149 — Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25 — Conviction for rioting, murder, attempt to murder, causing hurt — Evidence — Eyewitness testimonies — Corroboration by medical evidence — Recovery of weapons — Previous enmity as motive — Appeal against conviction dismissed.
India Law Library Docid # 2438310

(353) MASA SINGH @ MASSA SINGH @ MANDEEP SINGH Vs. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 13-01-2026
National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 — Section 21 — Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, Section 43D(5) — Appeals against dismissal of bail applications — Offence under Sections 304, 153-A, 120B IPC and Sections 13, 18, 18A, 18B, 20, 23 UA(P) Act, Sections 3, 4, 5 Explosive Substances Act — Prima facie case made out — Arguments based on parity with co-accused released on bail
India Law Library Docid # 2438311

(354) MALKIAT SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 13-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 364, 302, 201 — Appeal against conviction and sentence for offences of kidnapping, murder, and concealment of evidence — Circumstantial evidence — Admitted fact that there was no eye-witness to the incident — Case based on circumstantial evidence.
India Law Library Docid # 2438312

(355) HARJINDER KAUR Vs. PUNJAB STATE TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 13-01-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226/227 — Writ Jurisdiction — Disputed questions of fact — High Court cannot adjudicate disputed questions of fact in a writ petition — Proper remedy is a civil suit where evidence can be appreciated.
India Law Library Docid # 2438313

(356) SATNAM CHAND AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 13-01-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ Petition — Powers of High Court — Common issues in multiple petitions — Consolidation and disposal by a common order — Held permissible with consent of parties.
India Law Library Docid # 2438314

(357) STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. GOPI @ BHALABHAI GIRISHBHAI DEVIPUJAK AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 13-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 302, 201, 366, 376(D) — Appeal against conviction and death sentence for murder and gang rape — Prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence including ‘last seen’ theory, extrajudicial confession, medical history, and DNA analysis — Court found that the chain of circumstances was not complete and there were significant doubts regarding the reliability of the evidence — ‘Last seen’ evidence was weak and not corroborated — Extrajudicial confession lacked details
India Law Library Docid # 2438395

(358) RAJ BAHADUR AND OTHERS Vs. PAWAN KUMAR AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 13-01-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 1 Rule 10 — Impleading parties — Plaintiff is dominus litis and has the right to implead necessary parties — If the original plaintiff does not oppose the impleadment application, and the suit is at an early stage, and the impleaded party has similar grievances and cause of action, impleadment is justified to avoid multiplicity of litigation and ensure full adjudication.
India Law Library Docid # 2438426

(359) MANJIT KAUR Vs. MANPREET KAUR AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 13-01-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 9 Rule 13 — Setting aside ex-parte order — Condonation of delay — Sufficient cause — Petitioner's claim of illiteracy contradicted by records — Previous counsel's alleged lapse not a sufficient reason for condonation of significant delay — Petitioner's explanations for delay were vague and general, failing to meet the required scrutiny — Petitioner's actions showed a casual
India Law Library Docid # 2438427

(360) GANGA COTTON AND ALLIED INDUSTRIES LIMITED, SIRSA Vs. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 13-01-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ jurisdiction — Quashing of criminal proceedings — Abuse of process of court — Proceedings initiated with malicious intent rather than genuine legal purpose are liable to be quashed — Prosecution of appellants for offences under IPC Sections 376, 376A, 376D, 420, 120B of IPC, and Section 8 of POCSO Act — Allegations of sexual assault on a minor — Medical evidence showing no sign of sexual assault — Dying declaration
India Law Library Docid # 2438428

First
«
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
»
Last