ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(281) ANIL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 498-A, 201 — Murder, Cruelty by husband or relatives of husband, Causing disappearance of evidence of offence — Dying declarations — Reliability — Validity of dying declarations depends on whether they were made when the victim was in a fit mental and physical state — Prosecution must prove that the person recording the statement verified this fitness
India Law Library Docid # 2433971

(282) ASHOK KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Conviction altered to Section 304 Part I (Culpable homicide not amounting to murder) — Factors considered: Lack of premeditation and motive, sudden quarrel, absence of undue advantage or cruelty, fatal injury being one of several.
India Law Library Docid # 2433972

(283) BOOTA SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Circumstantial evidence — Prosecution case relied heavily on eyewitness testimony, but the court found significant inconsistencies and doubts regarding the eyewitness's presence and credibility. The court also noted issues with the investigation, including delayed recording of statements and questionable recovery procedures. The court held that the
India Law Library Docid # 2433973

(284) VIMLA DEVI LUNIA Vs. UNION OF INDIA[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Sections 147, 148, 143(3) — Reopening of assessment — Escaped income — Petitioner filed return, faced scrutiny assessment, and received assessment order under Section 143(3) — Subsequently, notice under Section 148 was issued alleging receipt of unsecured loan of Rs. 2,36,66,658/- that escaped assessment — Petitioner claimed to have given loan, not received it, and provided
India Law Library Docid # 2433974

(285) M/S. UMMED ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 23-09-2025
Rajasthan Transparency in Public Procurement Rules, 2013 — Rules 59, 60, 61, 2013 — Tender Conditions — e-NIB No. 1/25-26, Condition No. 4 — Submission of GSTR-3B — Petitioner declared non-responsive for failure to submit latest GSTR-3B by the last date for bid submission — GSTR-3B for March 2024-25 filed belatedly after the bid submission deadline — Held, requirement of submitting latest GSTR-3B was mandatory
India Law Library Docid # 2433960

(286) STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. SONI AND ANOTHER[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) — Sections 50, 20 — Offence of possessing Charas — Appeal against acquittal — Trial court acquitted accused based on the reasoning that the SFSL report did not mention the percentage of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to classify the substance as Charas, citing a previous
India Law Library Docid # 2434022

(287) SMT. AMAR KAUR AND OTHERS Vs. SH. RISHIB KUMAR[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 151 — Inherent powers of Court — Application for proving Hindi version of exhibited Urdu documents — Dismissal by Appellate Court — Held, Appellate Court misdirected itself by treating the application as one for leading additional evidence under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC — The prayer was to place on record translated copies of already exhibited documents, not to lead new
India Law Library Docid # 2434023

(288) MARS BOTTLERS UNA PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Himachal Pradesh Excise Act, 2011 — Sections 29(b), 29(c), 30(1), 30(2), 31, 39(3), 39(4), 43(b), 43(d), 44(b), 66(2) and Chapter VIII — Suspension of Licence — Contradictory statements in Inspection Report and FIR — Petitioner's plea that inspection was not conducted and no liquor was detected — Inconsistencies regarding identity of person to whom vehicle custody was handed over, status of person, disappearance of
India Law Library Docid # 2434024

(289) PURVISH INDRAKANT SHAH AND OTHERS Vs. SHYAMAL JAGDISHCHANDRA SHETH[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Trade Mark Law — Assignment of Trademark — Effect of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) — An MoU can constitute a written agreement for assignment of trademark rights, transferring exclusive ownership to the assignee upon fulfilling the agreed payment terms.
India Law Library Docid # 2434177

(290) UMAR HARIS Vs. YUSRA MERAJ AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 528 — Quashing of proceedings — Maintenance Petition — Settlement Agreement — Rights of child not impacted by Settlement between parents — Wife cannot compromise child's right to maintenance — Divorcee wife entitled to maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. irrespective of divorce grounds — Estoppel principle not absolute for child's
India Law Library Docid # 2434228

(291) REVACURE LIFESCIENCES LLP AND OTHERS Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 — Sections 13, 27, 32 — Offences under Chapter IV — Registration of FIR and investigation by Police — Not permissible — Only specified persons under Section 32 are empowered — Police officer cannot register FIR under Section 154 Cr.P.C. or investigate cognizable offences under Chapter IV of the Act.
India Law Library Docid # 2434229

(292) CHAND MIYAN Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)[DELHI HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 6 — Aggravated penetrative sexual assault — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 376(2) — Rape — Age of victim — Child — Presumption under Section 29 POCSO — Foundational facts — Case involved a prosecutrix who was 8 years and 3 months old at the time of the alleged incident, falling within the definition of "child" under
India Law Library Docid # 2434230

(293) NAVEEN NISHOK KUMAR Vs. HARISH KUMAR AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Registration Act, 1908 — Section 17 — Deeds requiring registration — An unregistered Deed of Cancellation of a registered Relinquishment Deed holds no legal effect, as documents transferring rights in immovable property valued at Rs. 100 or more must be registered.
India Law Library Docid # 2434231

(294) CHITRANSHI Vs. RAJNARAYAN TRIPATHI[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 22-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order VI Rule 17 — Amendment of Pleadings — Proviso restricting amendment after commencement of trial — Exception for due diligence — Commencement of trial is not merely framing of issues but when evidence is fixed to be led — Filing of affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief and leading evidence after amendment are valid grounds for
India Law Library Docid # 2433015

(295) PRASADI DAS AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 22-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 304B — Dowry death — Essential ingredients — Death by burns or bodily injury or otherwise than in normal circumstances within seven years of marriage — Cruelty or harassment by husband or relatives soon before death — For or in connection with dowry demand — If these are proven, death is dowry death.
India Law Library Docid # 2433316

(296) GURUDAYAL YADAV AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 22-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 read with Section 34 — Murder and common intention — Conviction challenged — Trial court convicted appellants for murder and sentenced them to life imprisonment — Held, prosecution story lacked corroboration, and there were material contradictions and discrepancies in the evidence — Two possible views arose, one favouring the accused — Conviction and sentence set aside, appeal allowed.
India Law Library Docid # 2433317

(297) SHAMBHU KUMAR PANDEY AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 22-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 392, 394, 397 — Robbery and Armed Robbery — Conviction — Appeal against — Factual matrix of bank robbery, apprehension of accused, and recovery of looted cash was established — Defence of false implication due to mistaken identity was not convincing — Accused were caught red-handed with looted cash — Appeal dismissed on merits regarding conviction.
India Law Library Docid # 2433318

(298) MOOLCHANDRA Vs. KAMLABAI THRU.LRS.MANOJ AND ANOTHER[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 22-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Substantial Question of Law — This court admitted the appeal for final hearing on the substantial question of law concerning the justification of the lower appellate court in passing a decree for eviction under Section 12(1)(d) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961.
India Law Library Docid # 2433277

(299) BHUJBAL SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (GWALIOR BENCH)] 22-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 — Temporary injunction — Declaration of title and permanent injunction — Rejection of application for temporary injunction by trial court and affirmed by appellate court — Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India for setting aside the said orders.
India Law Library Docid # 2433278

(300) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Vs. RAKESH MANJHI[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (GWALIOR BENCH)] 22-09-2025
Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khandnyayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 — Section 2(1) — Writ Appeal — Condonation of Delay — Sufficient ground for condonation of delay established where the delay in filing the appeal was due to the fact that the impugned order was uploaded much later than its passing, and the appellants became aware of it only upon receiving an application from the respondent.
India Law Library Docid # 2433279