(281) STATE Vs. PRAMOD YADAV[DELHI HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 378(4) — Appeal against acquittal — Powers of appellate court — Appellate court must be slow to interfere unless trial court's view is perverse — Double presumption of innocence in favour of accused after acquittal reinforced by trial court — Can be disturbed only by thorough scrutiny on accepted legal parameters. India Law Library Docid # 2434214
(282) STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Vs. AJAY KUMAR YADAV[DELHI HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 363, 366, 376 — Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 4 — Kidnapping, rape of a minor, sexual assault — Appeal against acquittal — Failure of prosecution to prove age of victim — Essential element for invoking POCSO Act and sections related to offences against minors — No documentary evidence or ossification test for age determination — Oral India Law Library Docid # 2434215
(283) SRI. SHARANABASAPPA H.SUBEDAR AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, 2025 — Order in Application No. 5238-5263/2023 — Quashing of final seniority list — Allowing applications of direct recruits — Direct recruits challenged final seniority list of Deputy Superintendents of Police (DySP) on grounds of excess promotions by promotees and violation of government orders regarding recruitment quotas. Tribunal quashed the seniority list and directed reconsideration based on objections and guidelines. India Law Library Docid # 2434549
(284) DR. Y.S. SUMATHY Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 — Section 4 — Writ Appeal — Challenge to order of Single Judge dismissing writ petition — Appellant challenging a letter directing amendment of recruitment advertisement — Court to consider if AICTE Regulations, 2019 were applicable to recruitment process commenced in 2020. India Law Library Docid # 2434550
(285) THE BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE AND OTHERS Vs. M/S. SANGAM ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 (as amended) — Section 14B — Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Benefit of Development Rights) Rules, 2016 — Rules 4(8) — Approval of Modified Plan — Applicable Rules — Rules in force at the time of sanction, not at the time of application, apply. India Law Library Docid # 2434551
(286) M/S KARNATAKA FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. Vs. SMT T NALINI AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 — Rule 11-A(2) — Disciplinary proceedings — Disagreement with inquiry report — Requirement of notice to delinquent official — Rule 11-A(2) mandates Disciplinary Authority to record reasons for disagreement with Inquiry Officer’s findings and record its own findings if evidence is sufficient — Does not require notice to India Law Library Docid # 2434552
(287) IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. BADAVATH BALKISHAN AND OTHERS[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 149 — Insurance Company’s liability — Fake policy alleged — Insurer's defence was that the insurance policy produced by claimants was fabricated and not issued by it. Court found that the insurer had provided credible and verifiable records negating the existence of the policy, including a complaint lodged with the police. The claimants failed to prove the India Law Library Docid # 2434627
(288) KAMSANI ANJALI Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Detention of Adults Previously Rescued from Trafficking — Attaining majority does not automatically necessitate release if it's not in the best interest of the individual, especially in cases involving human trafficking victims who are material witnesses in pending criminal cases. The State has a duty to protect such vulnerable individuals from re-victimization. India Law Library Docid # 2434628
(289) AZIZ HASSAN KOTADIA Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986 — Section 3, Section 2(a), Section 2(g) — Preventive Detention — Detenu categorised as 'Goonda' — Robbery of jewellery shops with stabbing and threat — Actions prejudicial to public order — Court not to interfere with subjective satisfaction of detaining authority unless vitiated by arbitrariness or lack of evidence. India Law Library Docid # 2434629
(290) SRI REDDYSHETTY SRIHARI AND ANOTHER Vs. SRI SURINENI CHAKRADHAR RAO[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 26 Rule 9 and Section 151 — Appointment of Advocate Commissioner — Identification of suit schedule property — Application to appoint an Advocate Commissioner for identification of suit land was dismissed by the trial court — Held, the prayer for identification/location of land through an Advocate Commissioner amounts to collection of evidence and is not India Law Library Docid # 2434630
(291) C. CHANDRASHEKAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 120B, 420 — Conspiracy to cheat, Cheating — Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) — Misappropriation of goods, Abuse of official position — Appeals against conviction and sentence for conspiracy to cheat and misappropriation of public sector goods. Appellants argued that sanction for their prosecution was invalid and evidence did not prove their India Law Library Docid # 2434817
(292) THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, MAYILADUTHURAI AND OTHERS Vs. DHANRAJ JAIN AND OTHERS[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ Jurisdiction — Disputed Questions of Fact — High Court should not exercise its writ jurisdiction for adjudication when the case involves disputed questions of fact, as writ jurisdiction is for enforcement of rights and not for detailed fact-finding suitable for civil courts. India Law Library Docid # 2434818
(293) OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 — Section 10(1) & 10(2) — Prohibition of contract labour — Mandatory consultation with Central Advisory Board — Notification prohibiting contract labour cannot be issued without consulting the Central Advisory Board — Consideration of sub-committee report alone, without endorsement by the Central Advisory Board, is insufficient to satisfy Section 10(1) India Law Library Docid # 2434690
(294) MANALI CHAUDHARY AND THREE OTHERS Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Service Law — Recruitment — Educational Qualification — Determination of equivalence — The employer, not the recruiting agency, has the final authority to determine the educational qualifications for a post or whether a qualification is equivalent to the prescribed one — Recruiting agencies like Public Service Commissions are bound by the employer's decision. India Law Library Docid # 2434691
(295) DHARMENDRA KUMAR @ SAMEER MALIK Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 395, 397, 391 — Dacoity — Essential ingredients — Five or more persons conjointly committing or attempting to commit robbery — Conviction under Section 395 IPC unsustainable when only four individuals were charge-sheeted and tried, with no evidence of a fifth person's participation. India Law Library Docid # 2434692
(296) AMRIT LAL AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 304 Part II and 201 — Conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and concealment of evidence — Appeal against — Circumstantial evidence — Admissibility of recovery under Section 27 of Evidence Act, 1872 — Requirements for — Held, conviction based on circumstantial evidence requires each circumstance to be firmly proved, consistent only with guilt, and forming a complete chain with no reasonable ground for innocence. Recovery India Law Library Docid # 2434693
(297) NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. BABLU @ CHANDVEER AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 173 — Appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal — Territorial jurisdiction — Claim petition can be filed where accident occurred, claimant resides, or defendant (including insurance company) carries on business — Filing claim where insurance company has branch office is permissible and such Tribunal rightly exercises jurisdiction. India Law Library Docid # 2434694
(298) MANALI CHAUDHARY AND THREE OTHERS Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Service Law — Recruitment — Determination of Educational Qualification — Recruiting agency is bound by the employer's decision on the validity and equivalence of educational qualifications. India Law Library Docid # 2434695
(299) STATE OF KERALA Vs. ANIL KUMAR @ KOLUSU BINU[KERALA HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Circumstantial Evidence — Court's reliance on a chain of circumstances, including motive, opportunity, recoveries, and medical evidence, to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. India Law Library Docid # 2434862
(300) PATTAYAN SREEKANTH Vs. STATE OF KERALA[KERALA HIGH COURT] 15-10-2025 Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 120B — Criminal Conspiracy — Essential ingredients — Agreement between two or more persons to do an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means — Mere suspicion or circumstantial evidence not sufficient to prove conspiracy beyond reasonable doubt, especially when the accused is the son of India Law Library Docid # 2434863