ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(261) BHAIKAR RAJMETRAJI ANANDA KUMAR Vs. SRI ADLA UMA MAHESWARA RAO AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 20-11-2024
Since all these three Revision Petitions raised out of the Order dated 13.03. 2024 in l.A. Nos.588, 589, 590 of 2023 in O.S. No.341 of 2015 passed by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate First Class Mobile-Cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, these Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of by way of this Common Order.
India Law Library Docid # 2420915

(262) RAJASTHAN VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. SOMI CONVEYORS BELTINGS LIMITED AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 19-11-2024
Work Order — Restraint of — The main issue is whether the ex-parte interim order, which was passed without hearing the appellants, should be vacated to allow the procurement of conveyor belts essential for thermal power plants — RVVNL argued that the interim order was passed without hearing them, causing delays in essential procurement — They emphasized the urgency due to the impact on electricity production — The respondents argued that the appeal against the interim order is not maintainable a
India Law Library Docid # 2419837

(263) SHRI SURINDER SINGH YADAV Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED[DELHI HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Service Law — Promotion — Non-compliance of court order — The petitioner sought initiation of contempt proceedings against respondent for non-compliance with a previous court order regarding his promotion — The main issue was whether the respondent complied with the court's directions to reconsider the petitioner's promotion to Scale-III and subsequent scales — The petitioner argued that the respondent failed to grant him notional promotions to Scales IV and V, which would have allowed him to be
India Law Library Docid # 2419973

(264) SIDDHARTH KUMAR Vs. ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE[DELHI HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 — Sections 3 and 4 — Financial irregularities and money laundering, causing a loss of Rs. 3269.42 crores to a consortium of banks — The main issue is whether petitioner should be granted bail — The petitioner argues that he has been in custody for over 26 months, denies involvement in the alleged fraud, and claims his role is less significant than that of co-accused, whose bail was denied — The Enforcement Directorate opposes the bail, highlighting petiti
India Law Library Docid # 2419974

(265) M/S INDRA SINGH AND SONS. PVT. LTD. Vs. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL[DELHI HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
NDMC (Determination of Annual Rent) Bye-laws, 2009 — Unit Area Method — The petitioner challenged a property tax demand of Rs. 2,22,12,090 by the NDMC for property — The main issue was the validity of the property tax assessment orders dated 01.02.2016 and 16.10.2019, which were based on the NDMC (Determination of Annual Rent) Bye-laws, 2009, declared ultra vires by the court — The petitioner argued that the assessment orders were invalid as they were based on the 2009 Bye-laws, which had been s
India Law Library Docid # 2419975

(266) SOM DUTT Vs. THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Service Law — Compassionate appointment — The petitioner applied for compassionate employment after his father's death in 2000 — His application was rejected in 2013 due to not meeting financial criteria — Whether the petitioner is entitled to compassionate employment despite the previous rejection — The petitioner argued that the respondents' reconsideration of his application should result in his appointment — The respondents maintained that the initial rejection in 2013 was final and the peti
India Law Library Docid # 2420067

(267) SHAHEED ASHWANI KUMAR CHANDEL FILLING STATION, BERTHI (DHAROTI) Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Allotment of Petrol Pump — War widow — The petitioner, a war widow, was allotted a petrol pump dealership by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) in 2003 — She is challenging the No Objection Certificate (NOC) issued to Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) for setting up a new petrol pump nearby — Whether the NOC issued to BPCL violates guidelines regarding the distance between petrol pumps and other facilities, and whether it undermines the purpose of providing employment to the petitio
India Law Library Docid # 2420068

(268) ASHOK KUMAR Vs. DAULAT RAM[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Sections 118, 138 and 139 — Dishonour of Cheque — The complainant lent Rs. 2,50,000 to the accused, who issued a cheque that was dishonored due to insufficient funds — Despite a legal notice, no payment was made, leading to a complaint under Section 138 — Whether the cheque was issued for the discharge of a legally enforceable debt and whether the trial court erred in acquitting the accused — Petitioner argues that the trial court wrongly dismissed the complai
India Law Library Docid # 2420069

(269) VISHAL BORA Vs. STATE OF U.P.[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (LUCKNOW BENCH)] 19-11-2024
Bhartiya Nyay Sahhita, 2023 — Sections 191(2),191(3), 190,61(2),109,115(2) & 351(2) — The main issue is whether accused should be granted bail — The petitioner claims innocence, stating he is not named in the FIR and is not seen in CCTV footage — He argues for bail on the grounds of parity with co-accused, who has been granted bail — The State opposes bail, citing credible evidence against accused but acknowledges the co-accused's bail — The court considers the applicant's jail time, lack of cri
India Law Library Docid # 2420020

(270) SHAHIN NOBLE PILLI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 420 — Fraud and cheating related to cryptocurrency investments — The applicant filed an application under Sections 438 against an order dismissing his discharge application in a case involving alleged fraud and cheating related to cryptocurrency investments — Whether the applicant should be discharged from the case based on the evidence and whether the order dismissing the discharge application is interlocutory
India Law Library Docid # 2420193

(271) RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs. AMDARAM HIRARAM (DELETED) AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Motor Accident Claims — The case involves a motor accident where the deceased, driving Truck, collided with a stationary truck without parking signals, resulting in his death — The main issues were the negligence attributed to the deceased and the calculation of compensation — Insurance Company argued that the deceased was not negligent and that the stationary truck driver was fully responsible for the accident — The respondents supported the Tribunal's decision, arguing that the deceased was pa
India Law Library Docid # 2420194

(272) GUJARAT ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs. HEMLATA SHITALBHAI SALAT AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Motor Accident Claims — The case involves a road accident where a motorcycle, with the deceased as a pillion rider, collided with a GSRTC bus — The accident resulted in the death of the motorcycle rider and the pillion rider — The main issue was whether the GSRTC bus driver was solely negligent or if there was contributory negligence by the motorcycle rider — GSRTC argued that the motorcycle rider was also negligent and that the compensation should be reduced accordingly — The respondents argued
India Law Library Docid # 2420196

(273) STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS Vs. ASHIKIBAHEN VIRENDRAKUMAR PATEL AND ANOTHER[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Gujarat Teachers of Government Secondary and Higher Secondary Schools (Procedure for Selection) Rules, 2012 — Rule 11 — The respondent holds a B.Sc. in Botany, an M.Sc. in Microbiology, and a B.Ed — She cleared the Teachers’ Aptitude Test (TAT) for Higher Secondary Teacher in Biology but was not issued an appointment order — The main issue was whether the respondent's post-graduation in Microbiology, a specialized subject of Botany, qualified her for the appointment despite the appellant's claim
India Law Library Docid # 2420198

(274) LH OF LATE JASHVANTBHAI ABHESINGBHAI VASAVA AND OTHERS Vs. JESINGBHAI ABHESINGBHAI VASAVA AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Bombay Land Revenue Code — Section 73AA — The case involves a dispute over land and house properties — The plaintiffs claim ownership based on a will executed by their deceased father — The main issues include whether the will constitutes a valid transfer under the law, the applicability of Section 73AA of the Land Revenue Code, and whether the suit was filed within the limitation period — The plaintiffs argue that the will is valid and that they should be declared the owners of the property — T
India Law Library Docid # 2420200

(275) GOPINATH APARTMENT CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 — Sections 264 and 268 — The Gopinath Apartment Co-operative Housing Society sought redevelopment of their dilapidated building — Despite majority consent, some members opposed the redevelopment — Whether the redevelopment process followed legal requirements and if the objections by minority members were valid — The society argued that the building was unsafe, and redevelopment was approved by over 75% of members, meeting legal requirements — Th
India Law Library Docid # 2420205

(276) ARVINDBHAI @ ANIL @ TIKU AMBABHAI GAJERA PATEL Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 — Section 2(c) — “dangerous person” — Detention — The petitioner was preventively detained as a "dangerous person" under the Act — The legality and validity of the detention order were challenged, questioning whether the petitioner's actions affected public order or merely law and order — The petitioner's counsel argued that the alleged offenses did not impact public order but were related to law and order, thus not justifying preventive det
India Law Library Docid # 2420206

(277) DR. BHOOP SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Correction of Date of Birth — The appellant joined as a Lecturer in Government College, Bhiwani, with his date of birth recorded as 08.05.1946 — In 1999, he discovered his actual date of birth was 11.08.1948 and sought correction in official records, which was denied — Whether the appellant's request for correction of his date of birth after a long period is permissible — The trial and appellate courts did not consider the evidence properly while dismissing his suit and appeal — The appellant's
India Law Library Docid # 2420261

(278) MOHINDER SINGH MALIK Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Correction of Date of Birth — The appellant an employee of the Haryana State, sought correction of his date of birth from 10.11.1946 to 14.09.1949 — His application was based on discrepancies in records maintained by the Chief Medical Officer, Rohtak — Whether the appellant's date of birth should be corrected in official records despite the delay in filing the suit — The appellant argued that both the trial court and the first appellate court dismissed his suit without properly appreciating the
India Law Library Docid # 2420262

(279) DHANPAT SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Correction of Date of Birth — The appellant sought to correct his date of birth from 15.05.1947 to 15.08.1949, as recorded in his matriculation certificate issued by Punjab University — Whether the appellant's request to change his date of birth after 25 years of service is permissible — The appellant argued that the First Appellate Court failed to appreciate the evidence and wrongly set aside the trial court's judgment — The respondents contended that the appellant's request was rightly dismiss
India Law Library Docid # 2420263

(280) RAM AVTAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 19-11-2024
Service Law — Retirement date — Date of birth — The appellant was appointed as a teacher in 1973 — His date of birth was recorded as 06.06.1945 in his service record, but he claimed it was 06.06.1948, which would extend his retirement date — The main issue was whether the appellant's date of birth should be corrected from 06.06.1945 to 06.06.1948 in his service records — Petitioner argued that his date of birth was incorrectly recorded due to a clerical error and should be corrected to reflect 0
India Law Library Docid # 2420264