(244) HASANBHAI MAHAMADBHAI ISHAAT Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 18-09-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B), 34 and 212 — The applicant is seeking regular bail after being charged with multiple offenses, including forgery and conspiracy, related to a fraudulent land transaction — Whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the nature of the accusations, the evidence, and the applicant's role in the alleged crime — The applicant's lawyer argues that the applicant is a bona fide purchaser, has been in custody for over 11 mont
India Law Library Docid # 2418697
(245) MUKESHBHAI NARPATLAL SHAH Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 18-09-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 465, 467, 468, 406, 420 and 114 — The petitioner sought to quash an FIR related to a land sale agreement where he and another accused allegedly took Rs. 41 lakh from the complainant without the possibility of executing a sale deed —Whether the petitioner committed forgery, criminal breach of trust, and cheating under Sections 465, 467, 468, 406, 420, and 114 — The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, did not forge any documents, and acted only as a midd
India Law Library Docid # 2418698
(258) MANISH KUMAR @ BABA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 17-09-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 307, 427, 212 and 120B — Explosive Substance Act, 1908 — Sections 6, 7 and 8 —Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — Sections 13, 16, 17, 18, 18B and 20 — The appellant was not named in the FIR but was implicated based on the statement of a co-accused — He has been in custody for over 2 years without any incriminating material found against him — Whether the appellant should be granted bail despite the stringent conditions under UAPA, given his long period
India Law Library Docid # 2417980