ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(221) ARVIND GUPTA @ ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA AND ANOTHER Vs. SHRI SATYA NARAIN BHAGWAN TRUST, REWARI AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 29-09-2025
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 — Section 13 — Eviction petition — Order of Rent Controller — Challenge to order refusing to recall previous order wherein tenant's counsel stated no further evidence to be led except proving a document by secondary evidence — High Court found it unacceptable that parties or counsel were unaware of the recorded statement for a long period — Tenants barred from
India Law Library Docid # 2433881

(222) SARABJIT KAUR AND OTHERS Vs. BALJIT KAUR AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 29-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 1 Rule 10 — Impleading parties — Trial court allowed application to implead a subsequent purchaser as a party in a suit challenging a sale deed — Court held that the purchaser was a transferee pendente lite and bound by the doctrine of lis pendens, therefore, not a necessary or proper party.
India Law Library Docid # 2433882

(223) BIKRAMJIT SINGH Vs. VARUN KUMAR AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 29-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 6 Rule 17 — Amendment of pleadings — Proviso — Trial commenced — Amendment after commencement of trial — Not allowed unless due diligence shown — Issues framed and case set for recording evidence signifies commencement of trial — Amendment application filed after issues framed, without showing due diligence, is hit by proviso and cannot be allowed.
India Law Library Docid # 2433883

(224) M/S. OBEROI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Vs. M/S. NITASHA CONSTRUCTION[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 29-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 151 — Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Condonation of delay — Court can condone delay in filing appeals for valid reasons and a period of 177 days was condoned.
India Law Library Docid # 2433930

(225) SURJIT KAUR (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HER LRS Vs. PAWAN KUMAR AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 29-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section relatable to appeal (implied) — Regular Second Appeal — Scope limited, especially in Punjab and Haryana High Court — Appeals treated under Section 41 of Punjab Courts Act, 1918, not Section 100 CPC — No question of law strictly required to be framed, but court examines for
India Law Library Docid # 2433931

(226) JAWAHAR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS Vs. LAL SINGH[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 29-09-2025
Civil Procedure — Regular Second Appeal — Scope — In Punjab and Haryana, second appeals are treated as appeals under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918, not under Section 100 CPC. No question of law is required to be framed for such appeals.
India Law Library Docid # 2433932

(227) NATUBHAI DHIRUBHAI NAIK AND ANOTHER Vs. ALKESHBHAI KASHIRAM PATEL AND ANOTHER[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 29-09-2025
Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Section 16(c) — Readiness and Willingness — Agreement to sell — Unregistered document — Admissibility for evidence vs. basis for decree — Trial court erred in granting specific performance based on unregistered agreements because they are inadmissible as a basis for a decree, can only be used for evidentiary purposes, and do not confer title or rights.
India Law Library Docid # 2434155

(228) ANILKUMAR MORALILAL DUBE Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 29-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 365, 367, 342, 377, 384, 323, 325, 506(1), 392 read with Sections 34 and 114 — Conviction and Sentence — Appeal against — Held, prosecution successfully proved charges beyond reasonable doubt — Evidence of injured witnesses was consistent and reliable, corroborated by medical evidence — Common intention and pre-arranged plan established — Conviction under Sections 325 and 328 IPC set aside as not sustainable.
India Law Library Docid # 2434156

(229) STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. ANAND MAHENDRABHAI PATEL (NOMINEE OF THE MANUFACTURING FIRM) AND ANOTHER[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 29-09-2025
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 — Sections 2(i-a)(m), 7(i), 7(v), 16 — Adulteration of Food — Appeal against Acquittal — Scope of Appellate Court’s Power — Appellate court has full power to review and re-appreciate evidence in appeals against acquittal, similar to appeals against convictions. While there is a double presumption of innocence in favour of an accused who has been acquitted, the appellate court can interfere if it finds manifest illegality or perversity in the trial court'
India Law Library Docid # 2434157

(230) LT. JASUBHAI/JASWANTRAI HARILAL SARVIYA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 29-09-2025
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Grant of Agriculturist Certificate — Validity and Extension — When agricultural land is acquired, an agriculturist is issued a certificate allowing a period to purchase new land. The validity of this certificate and its extension are governed by specific government resolutions.
India Law Library Docid # 2434158

(231) AMEY REALTY & CONSTRUCTION LLP AND OTHERS Vs. BAGWE HOUSING PRIVATE LTD. AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 29-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11(d) — Rejection of Plaint — Grounds — Barred by limitation — Court considers only averments in plaint and annexed documents — Plaintiff aware of Deeds of Surrender by December 21, 2009 — Suit filed August 20, 2016 — Clearly barred by limitation.
India Law Library Docid # 2434362

(232) MASJID AND MADARSA GAUSIYA AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 29-09-2025
Abuse of Process of Court — Petitioners attempted to mislead the Court by suppressing material facts and misrepresenting the timeline of events, leading to an urgent listing of their application. This conduct constitutes an abuse of the court's process.
India Law Library Docid # 2434493

(233) RAM VISHAL PATERIYA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 27-09-2025
M.P. Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees Pension Rules, 1979 — Definition of Permanent Employee & Commencement of Qualifying Service — Employees paid on monthly basis, even if described as daily rated, are considered temporary contingency paid employees and can be considered permanent contingency paid employees for pension purposes upon completing 15 years of service.
India Law Library Docid # 2433276

(234) M/S HI-TECH HERITAGE LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. KRISHNA SINGH AND OTHERS[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 — Suit for Declaration — Maintainability — A suit for declaration that a sale deed is void ab initio is maintainable even without a prayer for cancellation of the deed, as the plaintiff, not being an executant of the deed, is not obligated to sue for its cancellation, and can treat it as non-existent if it does not bind them.
India Law Library Docid # 2433312

(235) CHANDRAKANT OJHA Vs. CHANCHALA KUMARI[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Family Courts Act, 1984 — Section 19(1) — Appeal against Family Court judgment — Appeal filed after delay of 207 days — Condonation of delay sought on grounds of father's illness, financial crunch, and time taken to obtain certified copy — Court emphasized that condonation is an exception and requires sufficient cause and bona fide — Held that father's illness and financial crunch not sufficient explanation
India Law Library Docid # 2433313

(236) NIKITA AND OTHERS Vs. BALRAM AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 26-09-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227 — Revisionary jurisdiction of High Court — Power to supervise subordinate courts — High Court can interfere if lower appellate court order is contrary to settled legal principles, passed without proper appreciation of evidence or causes irreparable prejudice.
India Law Library Docid # 2433284

(237) MD. MUKTAR MOMIN Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004 — Rule 54(6) — Interpretation of — Power to impose penalty — District Mining Officer's authority to impose penalty under Rule 54(6) is derived from Section 21(5) of the MMDR Act, 1957, read with relevant notifications empowering State functionaries.
India Law Library Docid # 2433310

(238) JHARKHAND URJA VIKAS NIGAM LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. M/S DEW CONCRETE PRIVATE TILES LIMITED AND OTHERS[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Electricity Act, 2003 — Section 126 and 127 — Assessment and Appeal — Proceedings under Section 126 for unauthorized use of electricity, culminating in a final assessment order, are subject to an appeal under Section 127. This statutory scheme provides a complete code for addressing such grievances.
India Law Library Docid # 2433311

(239) NAVEEN YADAV Vs. STATE NCT OF DELHI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Bail Application — offence under Section 69 of BNS — Applicant incarcerated for over 1 month — Seeks regular bail — FIR alleges false promise of marriage, sexual exploitation, and dowry demand — Applicant claims innocence, falsely implicated, and highlights contradiction from complainant’s WhatsApp message — Reliance on Supreme Court judgments stating consensual relationship with genuine
India Law Library Docid # 2433701

(240) ADVANCE INDIA PROJECTS LTD. Vs. POONAM GUPTA[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 36(2) — Stay of arbitral award — Deposit of amount — Principles of Order 41 Rule 5 of CPC are to be considered, but not strictly applicable — Court has discretion to pass a reasonable order for deposit of undisputed amount — Deposit is to secure the award amount, not to reflect
India Law Library Docid # 2433920