ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(21) M/S AMD ESTATES AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. Vs. M/S VSR INFRATECH PVT LTD[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 9 — Interim relief — Principles for grant — Prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury — Court's role is to preserve subject matter of dispute and ensure award is not infructuous, not to
India Law Library Docid # 2433779

(22) KOMAL GARG (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HER LRS. Vs. MOHIT ARORA AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e) — Eviction petition — Bona fide need of landlord — Requirement for storing business equipment/tools due to space crunch — Landlord’s need is genuine and sincere, not whimsical or fanciful.
India Law Library Docid # 2433781

(23) HARISH Vs. STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 483, 528 (Corresponding to CrPC Sections 439, 482) — Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 376AB — POCSO Act, 2012 — Sections 6, 21 — Bail Application — Grant of bail is not solely based on gravity of accusation but on necessity of continued detention — Court must consider reasonable grounds for belief of guilt, nature of accusation, severity of punishment, likelihood of absconding, and possibility of repetition of offence.
India Law Library Docid # 2433783

(24) STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. AEHSAN[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20 — Recovery of Charas — Discrepancies in witness testimonies — Place of apprehension, steps taken after apprehension, and proceedings on the spot — Material contradictions leading to doubt — Case property preparation in CIA office and not on spot — Independent witnesses not supporting prosecution — Accused falsely implicated —
India Law Library Docid # 2434032

(25) HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED Vs. HCL INFOTECH LIMITED[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 34(3) — Condonation of delay — Application for setting aside an arbitral award must be filed within three months from the date of receipt of the award, with an additional grace period of thirty days if sufficient cause is shown.
India Law Library Docid # 2434033

(26) STATE OF H.P. Vs. HARNAM SINGH[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Sections 7 and 13(2) — Appeal against acquittal — Appellate court’s power to interfere with acquittal — High Court can interfere if acquittal is perverse, based on misreading or omission of material evidence, and no reasonable view other than guilt is possible — Double presumption of innocence favours accused in acquittal cases.
India Law Library Docid # 2434081

(27) KASHMIR CHAND SHADYAL Vs. STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Hindu Public Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1984 — Sections 22, 23 and 17 — Writ petition seeking directions for strict compliance of the Act — Court emphasized the historical and multifaceted role of temples in Indian society, including education, social welfare, arts, and even the freedom struggle — Highlighted the constitutional mandate under Article 25 for social reform and
India Law Library Docid # 2434090

(28) EX. HAV (CLK) SURJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Service Law — Ex-servicemen — Appointment Procedure — Government Instructions — Nomination by Ex-servicemen Cell — Requirement for Issuing Appointment Letters within 15 Days of Nomination — Departmental Violation of Instructions — Impact on Accrued Rights of Appointment — Denial of Regular Appointment Contrary to Statutory Rules and Requisition Conditions — Arbirtrary
India Law Library Docid # 2434091

(29) LAKSHMAN SINGH THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS Vs. MANOJ AND ANOTHER[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 09-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Substantial Question of Law — The High Court can interfere in a second appeal only when a substantial question of law arises.
India Law Library Docid # 2433839

(30) HARCHARAN (DIED) THR. LRS (A) NARENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (GWALIOR BENCH)] 09-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Substantial Question of Law — A Second Appeal lies only if a substantial question of law is involved. In this case, the High Court found no substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
India Law Library Docid # 2433840

(31) LAKHAN MAHARAJ AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 09-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302/34 — Murder — Common intention — Appeal against conviction for murder — Collision between truck and scooter causing death of deceased — Appellants argued innocence, unreliable eye-witnesses, lack of mens rea or motive as they were acquitted of conspiracy, and that the driver attempted to avert the collision — Evidence of skid marks suggested attempts to avoid impact
India Law Library Docid # 2433841

(32) PARVESH KUMAR @ MINTOO (MINOR) AND OTHERS Vs. RAJBIR[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 09-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — High Court’s jurisdiction is limited to substantial questions of law and not a third court of facts unless findings are perverse or based on no evidence.
India Law Library Docid # 2433889

(33) HARCHARAN SINGH Vs. PUNJAB STATE COOP. BANK LIMITED AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 09-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Second Appeal — Scope — Plaintiff filed suit for damages for malicious prosecution after acquittal in a criminal case — Trial court and lower appellate court dismissed the suit — High Court can only interfere if findings of lower courts are perverse or based on misreading of evidence — Plaintiff failed to prove malice and lack of reasonable cause — Second appeal upheld the dismissal of the suit
India Law Library Docid # 2433890

(34) RAMESH KUMAR Vs. JAGBIR SINGH AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 09-10-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Sections 166 and 140 — Motor Vehicular Accident — Compensation — Appeal for enhancement — Appeal filed against award passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for enhancement of compensation — Sole issue for determination is quantum of compensation awarded.
India Law Library Docid # 2433896

(35) HARDEV SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 09-10-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 226/227 — Writ Petition for regularization — Petitioner sought regularization based on Supreme Court judgments and State policy claiming continuous service for over a decade — Petitioner was recruited as Home Guard/Volunteer and served for three decades as Driver/Gunman — State argued that petitioner was a volunteer under relevant Act and Rules and Home Guards
India Law Library Docid # 2433897

(36) KULWANT SINGH Vs. JASWINDER KAUR AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 09-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 151 and Order XVIII Rule 4 — Examination of witnesses through video conferencing — Application allowed despite respondents being declared proclaimed offenders — Held, this does not bar criminal proceedings and is permissible in civil cases if necessary facilities exist — No
India Law Library Docid # 2433939

(37) DELHI CLOTH AND GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. Vs. ASHA RANI AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 09-10-2025
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 — Section 13(3)(a)(ii) — Eviction for landlord's own use or occupation — "Own use" to be interpreted broadly — Includes requirement for family members or dependents — Landlord is the best judge of their needs — Tenant cannot dictate alternative arrangements.
India Law Library Docid # 2433940

(38) SAMPAT BAI @HAHS STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 09-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 read with Section 34 — Murder and common intention — appeals against conviction and sentence of life imprisonment — Prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients for death by poisoning — Lack of clear motive, proof of administering poison, possession of poison, and opportunity to administer poison — Post-mortem report inconclusive, cause of death uncertain —
India Law Library Docid # 2433998

(39) BHIMA AND OTHER Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 09-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302 and 201 — Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence — Circumstantial Evidence — Burden of Proof — Prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt — No eyewitness — Circumstances did not form a complete chain — Lack of motive — Unreliable hearsay evidence — Doubtful extra-judicial confession — Infirmities in medical and recovery evidence — Benefit of doubt must go to the accused.
India Law Library Docid # 2433999

(40) VACHNA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 09-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Proof beyond reasonable doubt — Ocular and medical evidence — Discrepancy between FIR and charge-sheet — Interested witness — Absence of external injuries despite alleged fatal blow — Possibility of death due to fall — Uncertainty regarding cause of death, favoring the accused.
India Law Library Docid # 2434000