(181) WASIM ALI Vs. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 03-10-2026 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — Section 43D(5) and (6) — National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 — Section 21(4) — Bail — Scope of judicial scrutiny — Prima facie true test — Threshold inquiry at bail stage requires examining whether prosecution material, taken at face value without rebuttal, discloses essential statutory ingredients of alleged offences — Court is not required to evaluate probative value, weigh evidence, or conduct a mini-trial — Standard is statutory plausibility, India Law Library Docid # 2455043
(182) STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. PINTU DAGAR[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 03-10-2026 Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 302 and 301 — Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 114 — Double murder of wife and infant — Transfer of malice — Circumstantial evidence — Accused was seen dragging his blood-drenched wife carrying an axe — Deceased six-month-old infant was found fatally injured with incised wounds inflicted during the same occurrence — Held, under Section 114 of Evidence Act, it is safely presumed the infant was in his mother's lap when attacked — Applying the doctrine of transfer of malice India Law Library Docid # 2455044
(183) RAJASTHAN RAJYA SAHAKARI AVASAN KARMCHARI SANGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 03-10-2026 Service Law — Revised Pay Scales Rules, 2008 — Selection Scale — Entitlement of cooperative society employees — Financial loss of society as ground for denial — Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 14 and 21 — Petitioner-Union sought benefit of 6th Pay Commission revised pay scales and selection scale on completion of 9, 18, and 27 years of service for its members employed with respondent No.4 Federation — Registrar rejected claim citing alleged financial losses — Held, employees cannot be hel India Law Library Docid # 2455045
(184) SANJAY KUMAR MEENA Vs. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOREST, GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 03-10-2026 Service Law — Transfer — Non-application of mind — Incorrect mention of present place of posting — Petitioner was actively posted at Range Kailadevi pursuant to an earlier order of the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal — Employer issued a fresh transfer order erroneously recording petitioner's current posting as Karauli — Subsequent rectification order designated him as "under transfer" — Held, an employer must be fully cognizant of an employee's actual place of posting while issuing t India Law Library Docid # 2455046
(185) H. K. MEENA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANOTHER[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 03-10-2026 Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1996 — Rule 50 — Voluntary Retirement — Prospective resignation or retirement — Right to withdraw before effective date — Government servant applied for voluntary retirement and subsequently sought extension of the effective date before it arrived — State rejected extension and retired employee — Held, in absence of any legal bar, prospective voluntary retirement does not terminate service until the intended date and can be withdrawn prior thereto — Abse India Law Library Docid # 2455085
(186) SHAKUNTLA DEVI SHARMA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 03-10-2026 Service Law — Service Records — Correction of Clerical Error — Scope and Duty of Department — Petitioner's middle name was omitted in her appointment order and service book despite correct disclosure in her application and documents — Representation submitted for rectification remained unaddressed for years — Department rectified the error only after High Court issued notice — Held, service record is a sacrosanct document — When an employee seeks correction of an inadvertent clerical error verif India Law Library Docid # 2455086
(187) POONAM PATWAL Vs. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-10-2026 Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 — Rule 43 — Age Relaxation — Directorate of Education Notification dated 01.11.1980 — Applicability to Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) — MCD is an autonomous body under Part IX-A of the Constitution governed by distinct statutory Recruitment Rules — MCD Recruitment Rules prescribed upper age limit of 30 years for Teacher (Primary) without adopting the 10-year age relaxation for women provided under the 1980 Notification — Held, an executive notification is India Law Library Docid # 2454425
(188) MADHU DEVI Vs. UNION OF INDIA[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-10-2026 Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 — Section 23 — Condonation of delay — Delay of 257 days in filing appeal — Appellant was poor, illiterate, and suffered from paucity of funds, hindering timely legal advice — Beneficial nature of the legislation warrants a liberal approach — Attending circumstances established sufficient cause — Delay condoned. India Law Library Docid # 2454426
(189) BRITISH MARINE PLC Vs. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-10-2026 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sections 34, 36 and 37 — Execution of arbitral award — Discharge of bank guarantee — Decree Holder furnished a bank guarantee to secure the release of a portion of the deposited decretal amount — Judgment Debtor's challenge to the award under Section 34 and appeal under Section 37 were dismissed — No stay granted by the Supreme Court — Held, as the challenges to the arbitral award failed and no stay order operates, retaining the security serves no purpose India Law Library Docid # 2454427
(190) MS DEVI ELECTRONICS PVT LTD Vs. COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI SOUTH AND ORS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-10-2026 Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — Section 54(11) — Withholding of refund — Statutory requirements — Section 54(11) is founded on two distinct, cumulative ingredients: first, the order giving rise to refund must be the subject matter of an appeal, further proceedings, or any other pending proceedings under the Act; second, the Commissioner must independently form an opinion, after granting a hearing, that the grant of refund is likely to adversely affect revenue due to malfeasance or fra India Law Library Docid # 2454428
(191) MS. ASHI AGARWAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-10-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 11 — Res Judicata — Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ petition disposed of with direction to decide representation — Subsequent challenge — Earlier writ petition was disposed of directing the authority to consider the petition as a representation without any adjudication on merits — Impugned rejection order passed pursuant thereto gave rise to a fresh cause of action — Principle of res judicata applies only where an issue has been heard a India Law Library Docid # 2454429
(192) SMT. RANI Vs. SH. RAM SARUP (SINCE DECEASED) AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-10-2026 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 111 — Active confidence — Burden of proving good faith of transaction — Suit for cancellation of Sale Deed executed by elderly, illiterate father in favour of daughter — Daughter resided with father and was in a position of active confidence to exercise influence — Sale Deed was drafted in English while the executant only signed in Hindi and was not conversant with English — Held, the burden lay squarely on the daughter to prove that the deceased father unders India Law Library Docid # 2454430
(193) POONAM TANWAR Vs. STATE[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-10-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — - Framing of charge — Supervisory jurisdiction of High Court — Scope — Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is correctional and cannot be converted into an appeal on facts — High Court does not re-weigh material or substitute its conclusions merely because another view is possible — Detailed evaluation of evidence or roving inquiry into merits is impermissible at the stage of charge — Interference is warranted only to correct patent illegality, perver India Law Library Docid # 2454431
(194) MANSI BRAR Vs. MOHIT SINGH[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-10-2026 Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — Section 2(b) — Civil Contempt — False statement and suppression of material facts — Coordinate Bench directed status quo regarding title and possession of properties forming subject matter of MoUs based on the respondent's undertaking — Subsequent disclosures revealed that the properties had already been alienated prior to giving such undertaking — Respondent deliberately suppressed this reality from the Court — Held, tendering false statements or undertakings to d India Law Library Docid # 2454432
(195) M/S METAL CANS COMPANY Vs. BHUVAN MOHAN[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-10-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 12 Rule 6 — Indian Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 116 — Suit for possession — Judgment on admissions — Landlord-tenant relationship — Estoppel — Appellant claimed perpetual tenancy under Defendant No. 2 — Appellant admitted making direct payments to Plaintiff, corroborated by Defendant No. 2 confirming Appellant became a direct tenant — Direct tenancy established by conduct and admissions — Held, tenant who has attorned and paid rent directly is estopped un India Law Library Docid # 2454433
(196) ZOOM INSURANCE BROKERS PVT LTD Vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 25 1 AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-10-2026 Income Tax Act, 1961 — Sections 147, 148, and 148A — Reassessment — Scope of writ jurisdiction — Factual enquiry — Challenge to reassessment order under Section 148A(3) and notice under Section 148 regarding alleged bogus transactions involving middle layer business entities in the insurance sector — Assessee claimed that the receipts were genuine brokerage already accounted for in audited books and tax returns — Held, whether the transaction was spurious resulting in income escaping assessment India Law Library Docid # 2454434
(197) MOHD SHAHZAD KAMAL Vs. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-10-2026 National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 — Section 21(4) — Scope of appellate jurisdiction in bail appeals — Admissibility of subsequent events and evidence — Prosecution objected to appellate court considering witness testimonies recorded before the Trial Court after the impugned bail rejection order — Held, the High Court as an appellate forum possesses the jurisdiction to examine subsequent developments, including newly recorded evidence — Where the appeal remained pending for over two years t India Law Library Docid # 2454294
(198) M/S A.G. ENTERPRISES Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-10-2026 Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — Section 6(2)(b) — Bar on parallel proceedings — "Same subject matter" — Scope and applicability — Mere commonality of a supplier or an assessee in proceedings initiated by State and Central GST authorities does not attract the statutory bar under Section 6(2)(b) — Identity of subject matter requires factual verification of specific tax periods, transactions, invoices, precise Input Tax Credit amounts, and allegations in the respective show-cause notices India Law Library Docid # 2454301
(199) THE PRESIDENT MATCH COMPANY AND OTHERS Vs. MS. SRI BALAMURUGAN MATCH WORKS AND ANOTHER[MADRAS HIGH COURT (MADURAI BENCH)] 01-10-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 6 Rule 17 — Amendment of plaint — Trademark infringement suit — Explaining origin and continuity of business — Plaintiff sought to amend plaint to plead details of partnership, commencement of business by father, trademark licence, and subsequent transfer — Defendants contended it altered nature of suit and introduced new cause of action — Held, amendment merely explained genesis of business and basis of plaintiff's claim over registered mark — Foundation India Law Library Docid # 2454563
(200) R. UMMUSAFIA Vs. A. SOUNDARAJAN AND OTHERS[MADRAS HIGH COURT (MADURAI BENCH)] 01-10-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 6 Rule 17 — Limitation Act, 1963 — Articles 56, 58 and 59 — Amendment of plaint at appellate stage — Suit for permanent injunction dismissed — In appeal, plaintiff sought amendment to declare Power of Attorney forged and Sale Deed null and void — Defendant had disputed title in written statement based on registered documents — Limitation for declaration of title or forgery/cancellation of instrument is three years from accrual of right or knowledge — Plaintiff India Law Library Docid # 2454565