India Law Library

User not Logged..

Law Books shopping cart Launched! - Big Offers & Huge Discounts - All Law Books at One Place — Limited Time Deals!!

Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer

Latest Cases

First
«
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
»
Last

(121) PRIYANKA PANDEY Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 29-01-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ Petition — Compassionate Appointment — Rejection of claim — Impugned communication quashed — Competent authority directed to consider application in accordance with policy and Court’s observations.
India Law Library Docid # 2439059

(122) SMT. KAMLA AND ANOTHER Vs. BANWARI LAL (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 29-01-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 9 Rule 13 — Setting aside ex parte decree — Service of Summons — Defendant residing outside territorial jurisdiction — Summons must be transmitted through the court that has jurisdiction where the defendant resides — Direct issuance of summons by registered post without following
India Law Library Docid # 2439235

(123) SAT NARAIN AND OTHERS Vs. K.V. MULTI HEALTHPLEX PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 29-01-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 23 Rule 3 — Compromise Decree — Withdrawal of appeal does not amount to a compromise decree unless a written agreement signed by parties is produced and found lawful by the Court. Statements made by parties in an appeal only bind those who made them and do not prejudice the rights of others.
India Law Library Docid # 2439236

(124) HARVINDER SINGH Vs. BALWINDER SINGH @ KAKA AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 29-01-2026
Suit for Recovery — Allegations of fraudulent visa facilitation — Plaintiff sued for recovery of ₹5,00,000/- paid for facilitation of a permanent visa to Austria, alleging defendants failed to fulfill the promise and agreed to refund a part amount which they later failed to pay.
India Law Library Docid # 2439237

(125) OMBIR SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 29-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 148, 323, 342, 447, 506, 427, 324, 325, 326 & 149 — Conviction upheld — Revision petition filed challenging quantum of sentence — Conviction findings were not challenged by the petitioners — Evidence was consistent, reliable and sufficient to prove guilt — Trial and appellate courts’ findings were well-reasoned — No scope for interference in conviction.
India Law Library Docid # 2439238

(126) SATBIR SINGH Vs. HDFC BANK LTD. AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 29-01-2026
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Compounding of offence — Settlement between parties — Offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be compounded at any stage of litigation, even after conviction by the Magistrate and dismissal of appeal by the Sessions Court, if a
India Law Library Docid # 2439319

(127) HIRALAL SAHU @ HEERALAL Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 29-01-2026
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of cheque — Compounding of offence — Section 147 of the Act permits compounding of offences — Parties have compromised the matter and dispute between them has been resolved through payment and deposit of amounts — Conviction and sentence set aside based on compromise.
India Law Library Docid # 2439342

(128) RAKESH KUMAR @ KARMALI @ KAMLI Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 29-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 406 and 420 — Criminal Breach of Trust and Cheating — For criminal breach of trust, dishonest misappropriation of entrusted property is essential; mere breach of contract is insufficient.
India Law Library Docid # 2439406

(129) JITENDRA PANDEY Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 29-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 420 — Cheating — Essential ingredients — Deception at the very inception of transaction — Breach of contract does not amount to cheating unless deception is played from the beginning — Subsequent intention to cheat is not sufficient.
India Law Library Docid # 2439407

(130) BISHWANATH PRASAD Vs. DWARIKA PRASAD BHAGAT @ DWARKA PRASAD BHAGAT[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 29-01-2026
Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 – Sections 11, 12, 16 – Adoption – Validity of registered deed – Not challenged in proceedings – Adopted child acquires status in adopted family – Registered adoption deed is valid unless proven otherwise.
India Law Library Docid # 2439408

(131) KUTHU ORAON Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 29-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Conviction — Appeal — Trial court conviction for murder based on testimony of a 12-year-old eyewitness and alleged motive of rejected marriage proposal — Court found eyewitness testimony to be unreliable due to contradictions and lack of clear identification in the dark — No evidence from victim's daughter or her family was presented to substantiate motive.
India Law Library Docid # 2439409

(132) TEJO DAS Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 29-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302/34 — Murder — Conviction of appellant solely on the testimony of an eyewitness — Other co-accused acquitted based on same evidence — Court held that conviction of one accused based on same evidence on which others were acquitted is unsustainable unless there is clinching evidence against him — Reliance on potentially unreliable witness without corroboration is an error of law.
India Law Library Docid # 2439410

(133) SHRI. SKING RYMBAI Vs. STATE OF MEGHALAYAq[MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT] 28-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 376 and 506 (Part II) — Rape and Criminal Intimidation — Appeal against conviction and sentence — Delay in FIR lodging — Explained by the fact that the informant mother was away for 9 days attending to another daughter in hospital — Court noted that in rape cases, delay in FIR, if natural, doesn't benefit the accused.
India Law Library Docid # 2438836

(134) NARJINA @ NARZINA KHATUN Vs. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANOTHER[GAUHATI HIGH COURT] 28-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 202 — Postponement of issue of process — Mandatory inquiry for accused outside jurisdiction — Where the accused resides outside the Magistrate's territorial jurisdiction, it is mandatory to postpone the issue of process and inquire into the case or direct an investigation to
India Law Library Docid # 2438841

(135) SHRI MAHESH AND OTHERS Vs. ANUP[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)] 28-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 197 — Sanction for prosecution of public servant — Requirement of sanction for acts done in discharge of official duty or purported to be done in such discharge or in excess thereof — Protection available if alleged act is reasonably connected with official duty, even if in excess of duty, provided there is a nexus to official functions — Act entirely outside scope of duty does not require sanction — Sanction is a sine qua non if there is a reasonab
India Law Library Docid # 2438953

(136) SMT SHAREN NITIN NAIK Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (GOA BENCH)] 28-01-2026
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 5A — Apportionment of income between spouses governed by Portuguese Civil Code — When a married couple in Goa is governed by Section 5A, their income is treated as a single community income and assessed mechanically. If the assessment itself is challenged and settled for one spouse, the dispute cannot be treated as separate for the other spouse. The tax department cannot split a
India Law Library Docid # 2438954

(137) SHANTABAI AND OTHERS Vs. BHIKAN DAULAT CHOUDHARI AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (AURANGABAD BENCH)] 28-01-2026
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 — Section 84 — Recovery of possession — Maintainability of application — Application for recovery of possession under Section 84 filed after 36 years is not maintainable if the legal heirs of the original tenant were not in possession of the suit property during the lifetime of the original protected tenant and failed to initiate proceedings for recovery of possession even after
India Law Library Docid # 2438955

(138) SHWETA ADITYA MALHOTRA Vs. COLLECTOR OF STAMPS, ANDHERI DIVISION[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 28-01-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 226 and 227 — Writ Petition — Maintainability — Alternative Remedy — Availability of statutory remedy of appeal does not operate as an absolute bar to the maintainability of a writ petition. The rule requiring a party to pursue an alternative remedy is a rule of policy, convenience and discretion, not a rule of law. The High Court can entertain a writ petition even if an
India Law Library Docid # 2438956

(139) MR. VIJAYKANT MOTILAL KOTHARI Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 28-01-2026
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of cheque — Cheque issued towards hand loan taken by a third party — Complainant unable to prove that the accused took over the liability of the third party or had any financial relation with the accused prior to the cheque issuance — No documentary evidence of liability assumption
India Law Library Docid # 2438957

(140) SHIVAJI GOPAL KURHADE Vs. RAMCHANDRA GOPAL KURHADE AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 28-01-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rule 23A — Remand — Appellate Court's power to remand the entire suit — Remand is an exceptional power and should not be exercised mechanically or without proper justification — Wholesale remand is only warranted when the trial court's judgment is wholly unsustainable or the suit lacked
India Law Library Docid # 2438958

First
«
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
»
Last