India Law Library

User not Logged..

Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer

Latest Cases

First
«
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
»
Last

(121) VASANTHI SURESH AND OTHERS Vs. JAYACHITRA SAHAYA JOSEPHINE AND OTHERS[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 28-11-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sections 34 and 37 — Challenge to Arbitral Award — Scope of Appellate Court (Section 37) and Setting Aside Court (Section 34) — Findings of Fact — An Appellate Court exercising power under Section 37 or a Court deciding petition under Section 34 should not substitute its view by re-appreciating evidence unless there is perversity, patent illegality, or violation of public policy —
India Law Library Docid # 2436645

(122) A. ARAVINDHAN Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 28-11-2025
Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968 — Rule 14(ii) — Special Procedure dispensing with enquiry — Dismissal from service — Misconduct of assaulting superior officer — Petitioner, a Junior Clerk appointed under Sports Quota, assaulted and injured an Assistant Divisional Engineer with a wooden reeper inside the office premises — Disciplinary Authority, invoking Rule 14(ii), dispensed with inquiry,
India Law Library Docid # 2436646

(123) HARPAT (DECEASED THROUGH LRS) Vs. BOOTA SINGH AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 28-11-2025
Punjab Security of Land Tenure Rules, 1956 — Rule 6(6) — Surplus Area Declaration — Mandatory Notice to Tenants — The law mandates that notice must be served upon tenants in cultivating possession before land can be declared surplus by the Collector — An order declaring land surplus without issuing mandatory notice to the recorded tenants in possession is void ab initio (a nullity) and wholly without jurisdiction — Such a void order cannot divest the tenants of their rights.
India Law Library Docid # 2436919

(124) KANWAR MANJIT SINGH Vs. CHARANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 28-11-2025
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of cheque — Revision against conviction and sentence — Petitioner convicted by Trial Court (JMIC) and Appellate Court for dishonour of cheque of Rs. 1,00,000/- and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment plus fine — Petitioner confines prayer to modification of sentence, accepting conviction on merits — Repayment of Cheque Amount: Petitioner
India Law Library Docid # 2436920

(125) STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. Vs. RAVINDER SINGH INDERSINGH SEHGAL AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 28-11-2025
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Lease Deed — Interpretation of Clauses — Mesne Profits vis-à-vis Contractual Compensation/Penalty — Clause in lease deed stipulating payment of Rs. 12/- per sq. ft. per month (p.sq.ft.p.m.) for unauthorized use after 20 years, "without prejudice to his other rights and remedies, and charges, damages and/or compensation from the Lessee" — This "without prejudice" clause
India Law Library Docid # 2436992

(126) NAINESH SANGHVI AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 28-11-2025
Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Section 88 — Enquiry by Authorized Officer — Substitution of Authorized Officer — Legality of Report — Doctrine of Functus Officio — Once an Authorized Officer (Respondent No. 6) is replaced by the Registrar, his authority ceases (functus officio) to act or submit a report under Section 88, even if the proceedings were closed for reporting and the
India Law Library Docid # 2436993

(127) MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD Vs. SUPREME METAL INDUSTRIES AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 28-11-2025
Electricity Act, 2003 — Sections 2(15), 126, 127 — Consumer Status — Unauthorized Use of Electricity — Appellate Authority’s Jurisdiction — The definition of "consumer" in Section 2(15) requires either the electricity connection to stand in the person’s name, or authorization from the licensee to use the connection for the person's own use — A mere lessee or occupant (Respondent No. 2) who failed to apply for change of name, disclose his occupation/activity (under Regulations 10
India Law Library Docid # 2436994

(128) AMOL SUBASHRAO DESHPANDE Vs. SURESH INDAL CHAVAN[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)] 28-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 21 Rule 10 — Execution of Decree for Possession — Requirement to file execution proceedings — A decree holder, even with a decree for possession and in the absence of a stay order, is not entitled to unilaterally take possession of the suit property, even with police aid — CPC mandates that a decree holder must apply to the Court which passed the decree (or the executing court) by filing
India Law Library Docid # 2437001

(129) SURESH Vs. RANJANA ASHOK POLKAR[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)] 28-11-2025
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) — Sections 2(a), 2(f), 12, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23 — Maintainability of Application — "Domestic Relationship in the nature of marriage" — Quashing of Proceedings — The respondent filed an application under the DV Act, claiming domestic relationship with the petitioner (alleged husband) based on marriage and an agreement to live as spouses — Petitioner challenged maintainability citing lack of legal marriage, domestic relationship, or relat
India Law Library Docid # 2437107

(130) SHASHI OBEROI Vs. YASHPAL CHAWLA[DELHI HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e) — Eviction on ground of bona fide requirement — Burden of proof and essentials — Landlady must demonstrate that the requirement is real, genuine, honest, and sincere, devoid of deceit and falsehood, and not merely a wish or fanciful desire
India Law Library Docid # 2435949

(131) SHRI SURENDER BASOYA Vs. SHRI SANJEEV JOON[DELHI HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — Section 2(1)(c) — Commercial Dispute — Suit for cancellation of Sale Deed and Agreement to Sell — Determination of commercial suit nature — A suit qualifies as a 'commercial suit' if it falls under the definition of
India Law Library Docid # 2435950

(132) M/S FIRE IMMUNE SYSTEMS Vs. M/S ELESCO TRADERS PVT. LTD[DELHI HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 29 Rule 1 — Suits by or against corporation — Authorization to institute suit — Requirements — Order 29 Rule 1 permits a Director or principal officer of a corporation to sign and verify pleadings, as the holding of such office is prima facie sufficient to permit institution of proceedings — Where a Director (PW-1) deposed on oath and produced a Board Resolution
India Law Library Docid # 2435951

(133) CHEVURI RADHA KRISHNA AND ANOTHER Vs. THE ASST COMMISSIONER GUNTUR, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 — Section 88, 87(1)(c), 6(c)(ii), 2(23), 2(27), 2(25), 43, 44, 65 — Nature of Institution — Public vs. Private Ashramam/Religious Institution — Determining whether an Ashramam (which includes a Jeeva Samadhi) is a 'Religious Institution' or 'Temple' under the Act depends on whether it is of public or private concern,
India Law Library Docid # 2436115

(134) PADAVALA GANGA RAJU AND OTHER Vs. RUDRA TECHNO FEEDS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 6 Rule 8 read with Section 151 — Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — Application for filing Additional Written Statement (AWS) — Applicability of Commercial Courts Act — Where a suit relates to commercial transactions and is transferred to a Commercial Court, the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, including the amendments to CPC, apply. (Paras 9,
India Law Library Docid # 2436116

(135) M/S. NEW GEE ENN & SONS AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT SRINAGAR] 27-11-2025
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — Jammu and Kashmir Goods and Services Act, 2017 (J&K GST Act, 2017) — Cross-LoC Trade — Nature of Trade — The cross-Line of Control (LoC) trade, established as a Confidence Building Measure between India and Pakistan and regulated by the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) of 2008, constituted trade between the then State of Jammu and Kashmir (now Union
India Law Library Docid # 2436238

(136) DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs. INSHA ASHRAF BHAT AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT SRINAGAR] 27-11-2025
Special Scholarship Scheme (SSS) 2014-15 — Eligibility and Admission — Students from erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir sought admission under SSS — Revised guidelines mandated admission only through centralized counseling and college allotment by All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) — Private respondents admitted themselves to BDS course without sponsorship or allotment by
India Law Library Docid # 2436239

(137) STATE OF J AND K Vs. MUZAFFAR AHMAD MALIK AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT SRINAGAR] 27-11-2025
Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) — Section 378 (Appeal in case of acquittal) — Standard of Appellate Review — An appellate court should be slow to interfere with a judgment of acquittal unless it is contrary to evidence, palpably erroneous, or reflects a view that could not reasonably have been taken by the trial court — If two views are possible on the evidence, the one favouring the accused must be adopted — Interference
India Law Library Docid # 2436240

(138) SHER MOHD AND OTHERS Vs. THE UT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT JAMMU] 27-11-2025
Jammu & Kashmir Land Revenue/Acquisition — Writ Petition (Article 226) — Delay and Laches — Land Acquisition Matters — Appellants claimed entitlement to ownership rights and compensation for acquired state land based on Government Orders from 1958 and 1966, where acquisition process concluded in 1993, and writ petition was filed much later — Right to Property (Article 300A) considered a
India Law Library Docid # 2436260

(139) RADHELAL RAWAT AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (GWALIOR BENCH)] 27-11-2025
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 — Section 528 — Quashing of First Information Report (FIR) — Based on Compromise — Offences under Sections 308(2), 308(5), 308(7), and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) — Allegations involving "honey trap" conspiracy, blackmail, extortion, and threat of false implication in a rape case — High Court declined to quash the FIR despite
India Law Library Docid # 2436381

(140) IN RE SUO MOTU Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 27-11-2025
Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 — Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(4) — Termination of Pregnancy — Consent of Pregnant Person — Rape Victim — Pregnancy exceeding 24 weeks — SOP Guidelines issued by High Court Division Bench — The SOP procedures for reference to Medical Board and High Court for termination of pregnancy exceeding 24 weeks cannot be enforced and are not required to be carried out if the prosecutrix/victim, or her guardian (in case of a minor), refuses
India Law Library Docid # 2436382

First
«
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
»
Last