(1) DIPTI MADHUKAR SHETH Vs. BORIVALI EDUCATION SOCIETY AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 — Shikshan Sevak — Status and Statutory Protection under MEPS Act, 1977 — Following the amendment by Maharashtra Act 14 of 2007, the appointment and service conditions of a Shikshan Sevak cease to be a matter of mere contract and are statutorily converted into a status — The definition of "employee" under the Act India Law Library Docid # 2448321
(2) CHHAYA KASHINATH SHINDE Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 — Section 3E — Restriction on transfer of rehabilitation tenements — Scope of expression "or otherwise" — Held, words "sale, gift, exchange, lease or otherwise" are not confined to registered conveyances — Expression "or otherwise" is a word of extension, not limitation, intended to cover indirect arrangements through which an India Law Library Docid # 2448325
(3) M/S SHAKUN & COMPANY (SERVICES) PRIVATE LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. SH. ASHOK DUGGAL[DELHI HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Surrender of tenancy — Handing over possession to one of several co-owner landlords — Tenant Company claimed to have validly vacated premises by handing over keys to Defendant No. 2, who was simultaneously a Director of the tenant Company and a co-owner landlord — Held, such handing over, in the peculiar facts, did not constitute valid surrender to both co India Law Library Docid # 2448358
(4) RAJINDER KUMAR Vs. SEWA RAM (SINCE DECEASED) THR HIS LRS AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 Evidence Act, 1872 — Proof of disputed documents — Mere exhibiting insufficient — Marking of a document as an exhibit during trial does not dispense with the requirement of proving its execution in accordance with law — A disputed Ikrarnama/MoU containing signatures of attesting witnesses, none of whom were examined, and whose executant could not recall attestation, registration, or stamp India Law Library Docid # 2448359
(5) PAYAL AGARWAL AND ANOTHER Vs. SAWARMAL AGARWAL AND OTHERS[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 Hindu Succession — Partition Suit — Preliminary Decree — Grant of, where uncontested — Petitioners (widow and daughter of deceased) sought preliminary decree for partition of immoveable properties and shares in family companies as per their entitlement upon intestate death of the propositus. Defendant Nos. 1 to 4 neither contested the suit nor filed any written statement denying petitioners' rights. Held, in absence of any denial by principal contesting parties, and petitioners having India Law Library Docid # 2448360
(6) POULAMI TARAFDAR (SAHA) Vs. DIBESH SAHA[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 125 — Maintenance to child — Direction to keep amount in fixed deposit instead of monthly maintenance — Impermissibility of — Trial Magistrate, instead of granting monthly maintenance to the minor child, directed the husband to keep Rs.11,00,000 as fixed deposit in the child's name with the wife as nominee — Held, a fixed deposit securing future interest India Law Library Docid # 2448361
(7) EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED Vs. SHIULY BAURI AND OTHERS[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 National Coal Wage Agreement — Clause 9.5.0(ii) — Compassionate appointment to female dependent — Determination of age — Unchallenged entry in nomination form to prevail over subsequent Medical Board assessment — Age of the deceased employee's daughter as recorded in the Service Record/nomination form (9 years as on 01.04.1987), never disputed by the management, showed she had attained 18 years 8 months on the date of her father's death, contrary to the Medical Board's India Law Library Docid # 2448362
(8) VISHNU ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. Vs. STATE OF ODISHA AND OTHERS[ORISSA HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Alternative remedy — Maintainability of writ despite availability of statutory appeal under S. 44, Orissa Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2017 — Existence of appellate remedy before the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal under Sections 43-44 of the Act does not India Law Library Docid # 2448363
(9) AKSHYA KUMAR NAIK Vs. PAWAN KUMAR AGRAWAL AND OTHERS[ORISSA HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 Transfer of Property — Proof of title — Non-production of primary document of sale — Effect — Private opposite party claimed title through an unregistered stamp paper sale deed of 1946 for Rs. 100/-, but the deed itself was never produced before any authority or the Court — Held, in the absence of the document, neither the nature of transaction nor its terms could be ascertained, and the claimed sale, being the very foundation of subsequent claims, remained unproved. India Law Library Docid # 2448364
(10) PRANJIT SARMA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS[GAUHATI HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 UGC Regulations — Prescribed Qualification for Lecturers — Requirement of NET/SLET/PhD — Applicability to lecturers appointed in deficit colleges — Held, Government of Assam had adopted UGC norms prescribing NET/SLET/PhD as essential qualification for lecturers prior to appellants' appointment — Communication dated 01.06.2000 issued before appellants' appointment specifically required lecturers appointed in non-government deficit colleges after implementation of policy to clear India Law Library Docid # 2448345
(11) STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. PARBAT MERAMBHAI AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 372 — Appeal against Acquittal — Scope of Appellate Power — Held, Appellate Court has full power to review, re-appreciate and reconsider evidence upon which order of acquittal is founded, without limitation under the Code — However, Court must bear in mind double presumption of innocence favouring accused, first under fundamental criminal jurisprudence and second India Law Library Docid # 2448346
(12) CHAUDHARI NANJIBHAI SHAMJIBHAI (LEGAL HEIR OF LATE SHAMJIBHAI DALSANGBHAI CHAUDHARI) Vs. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ANOTHER[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Condonation of delay — Land acquisition appeal — Applicant seeking condonation of 6472 days' delay in filing First Appeal against reference court award — Held, "sufficient cause" cannot be established by mere invocation of liberal or justice-oriented approach — Delay must be attributable to India Law Library Docid # 2448347
(13) M/S. GOLD CREST EXPORTS Vs. M/S. SWASTIK OVERSEAS CORPORATION[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 Contract Act, 1872 — Section 73 — Contract — Sale of goods — Breach — Buyer's failure to take delivery — Suit for recovery of loss on account of fall in market price — Contract for sale of 6,400 MT castor seeds, delivery to be taken by buyer between 1st to 15th October 2004 against advance payment — Buyer failed to take delivery within stipulated period despite repeated communications by seller — Seller sold goods to third India Law Library Docid # 2448348
(14) MOHANAGAR COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. AND ANOTHER Vs. LALURAM MANGLIPRASAD MATRUBHA-VANI VAV AND ANOTHER[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 Civil Manual — Rule 429 — Non-deposit of paper-book charges — Dismissal for want of prosecution — Appellant failed to deposit estimated cost for preparing paper-book despite notice, and could not be traced/served by Bailiff even at address of the society and chawl — Held, in absence of compliance with Rule 429 and non-availability of records/evidence, no alternative but to dismiss appeal for want of prosecution — India Law Library Docid # 2448349
(15) SAIN MIRAN BABA DARVESH GHULAM Vs. STATE OF J&K AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT JAMMU] 31-07-2026 Jammu and Kashmir Wakaf Act, 2001 — Section 3(l) — "Wakaf by user" — Ziarat/Shrine — No formal deed necessary — Shrine of a deceased spiritual personage becoming a place of pilgrimage over a considerable period through continuous and uninterrupted public congregation acquires the character of a Wakaf by user — Neither the original saint nor his spiritual successor executed any deed dedicating the shrine, yet India Law Library Docid # 2448350
(16) STATE OF J&K Vs. MOHAMMAD RAMZAN MIR STATE OF J&K AND ANOTHER[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT SRINAGAR] 31-07-2026 Ranbir Penal Code, 1989 — Section 375 — Age of consent — Law applicable at time of occurrence — Alleged offence occurred in June 2007, when age of consent under RPC was 16 years, prior to enhancement to 18 years by J&K Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2013 (effective 22.03.2014) — School registration card, cross-examination of prosecutrix's mother, and medical opinion all established prosecutrix had crossed 16 India Law Library Docid # 2448351
(17) NARGIS BEGUM Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT SRINAGAR] 31-07-2026 Service Law — Termination during probation — Temporary Government servant — Notice period — Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955, R.16 and Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, R.5(1) — Petitioner appointed as Constable (GD) in CRPF while on probation — Services liable to be terminated at any time on one month's notice without assigning reason during probation — Conjoint reading of R.16 of India Law Library Docid # 2448352
(18) NISAR AHMAD JOO Vs. UT OF J&K AND ANOTHER[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT SRINAGAR] 31-07-2026 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483 — Bail — Successive bail application — Maintainability before superior court after rejection by trial court — Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 BNSS — Rejection of bail application by Sessions/Special Court does not bar High Court from entertaining successive application under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 BNSS on same facts and offence — Superior court can always entertain India Law Library Docid # 2448353
(19) MUZAFFAR AHMAD BHAT Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU & KASHMIR[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT SRINAGAR] 31-07-2026 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483 — Bail — Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) — Sections 8, 21, 22 and 29 — Bail — Confessional/disclosure statement of co-accused — Admissibility and evidentiary value — Corroborative material — Confessional statement of co-accused inadmissible against accused and cannot solely form basis for continued incarceration — However, where India Law Library Docid # 2448354
(20) SURYA WORLD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vs. STATE OF BIHAR[PATNA HIGH COURT] 31-07-2026 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI) — Sections 138 and 142 — Condonation of delay in filing complaint — Requirement of reasoned order — Cognizance under S. 138 taken after condoning 118 days' delay in filing complaint without any reasoned order — Held, mere endorsement of "Allowed" with initials and date in margin of petition, without drawing any order-sheet, cannot be treated as a valid order of condonation — India Law Library Docid # 2448355