India Law Library

ive

User not Logged..

Quick Judgments/News

Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting

Latest Cases

1
2
3
4
5
»
Last

(1) TENNETI MEENAKSHI RAJASEKHAR Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 01-12-2025
Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 — Sections 452(1) and 461(1) — Unauthorized Construction — Complaint by neighbor — Deviations from Sanctioned Plan — Compounding and Regularization — Where construction deviations are claimed to be minor (less than 10% of constructed area) and within permissible limits for compounding under GOMs.No.119, the authorities must first determine the extent of deviation before ordering demolition — Petitioners (builders)
India Law Library Docid # 2436118

(2) MOTOR AND GENERAL FINANCE LIMITED Vs. DIRECTOR GENERAL AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 28-11-2025
Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) — Section 82(2) — Appeal to High Court — Scope — An appeal under Section 82(2) is confined strictly to substantial questions of law — Findings of fact recorded by the Employees Insurance Court (EIC) regarding the nature of the establishment, wage records, admissibility of documents, and credibility of witnesses are outside the scope of interference unless
India Law Library Docid # 2435948

(3) PALLA CHENCHU HARIKALA Vs. BYSANI SATISH AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 28-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 47 Rule 1 — Review Jurisdiction — Scope — A judgment is open to review if there is a mistake or an error apparent on the face of the record or for any sufficient reason analogous to the grounds specified in the Rule — Review is not an appeal in disguise; it cannot be used to re-agitate or re-argue questions already decided or to correct mere erroneous decisions — The
India Law Library Docid # 2436119

(4) A.V.SRIDHAR REDDY AND OTHERS Vs. CH RAMANAIAH AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 28-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 96, Order 21 Rule 34 — Appeal against decrees — Scope of appeal against findings — Suit for Permanent Injunction — Specific Performance Decree and Execution — In a suit for permanent injunction, when title is seriously disputed (especially for vacant site), the court must examine title incidentally although the suit is not for declaration; possession follows title (de
India Law Library Docid # 2436120

(5) SMT. BODA SUBBALASKHMI Vs. CHODISETTI SATYANARAYANA AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 28-11-2025
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 8 — Operation of transfer — Property sold (Upstair building/First floor) — Balcony (Covered Varanda Portion) — Whether balcony is implicitly included in the transfer of the main building — Section 8 mandates that unless a different intention is expressed or necessarily implied, a transfer of property passes all interests the transferor is capable of passing in the
India Law Library Docid # 2436121

(6) STATE OF A.P.DIST.COLLECTOR EG DIST AND OTHERS Vs. B NARASIMHA MURTHY[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 28-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Interference with Land Acquisition Proceedings — Maintainability of Suit — Substantial Question of Law — Civil Court Jurisdiction — When evidence indicates that the land in dispute was not acquired by the Government, the apprehension that the Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a suit against land acquisition
India Law Library Docid # 2436122

(7) SHASHI OBEROI Vs. YASHPAL CHAWLA[DELHI HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e) — Eviction on ground of bona fide requirement — Burden of proof and essentials — Landlady must demonstrate that the requirement is real, genuine, honest, and sincere, devoid of deceit and falsehood, and not merely a wish or fanciful desire
India Law Library Docid # 2435949

(8) SHRI SURENDER BASOYA Vs. SHRI SANJEEV JOON[DELHI HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — Section 2(1)(c) — Commercial Dispute — Suit for cancellation of Sale Deed and Agreement to Sell — Determination of commercial suit nature — A suit qualifies as a 'commercial suit' if it falls under the definition of
India Law Library Docid # 2435950

(9) M/S FIRE IMMUNE SYSTEMS Vs. M/S ELESCO TRADERS PVT. LTD[DELHI HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 29 Rule 1 — Suits by or against corporation — Authorization to institute suit — Requirements — Order 29 Rule 1 permits a Director or principal officer of a corporation to sign and verify pleadings, as the holding of such office is prima facie sufficient to permit institution of proceedings — Where a Director (PW-1) deposed on oath and produced a Board Resolution
India Law Library Docid # 2435951

(10) CHEVURI RADHA KRISHNA AND ANOTHER Vs. THE ASST COMMISSIONER GUNTUR, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 — Section 88, 87(1)(c), 6(c)(ii), 2(23), 2(27), 2(25), 43, 44, 65 — Nature of Institution — Public vs. Private Ashramam/Religious Institution — Determining whether an Ashramam (which includes a Jeeva Samadhi) is a 'Religious Institution' or 'Temple' under the Act depends on whether it is of public or private concern,
India Law Library Docid # 2436115

(11) PADAVALA GANGA RAJU AND OTHER Vs. RUDRA TECHNO FEEDS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 6 Rule 8 read with Section 151 — Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — Application for filing Additional Written Statement (AWS) — Applicability of Commercial Courts Act — Where a suit relates to commercial transactions and is transferred to a Commercial Court, the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, including the amendments to CPC, apply. (Paras 9,
India Law Library Docid # 2436116

(12) KANHAIYA LAL THROUGH SPA HOLDER Vs. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 26-11-2025
Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) — Scope of Interference — Dismissal of Writ Petition — Maintainability — Appeal filed against the dismissal of a writ petition claiming proprietary and easementary rights over an adjacent plot of land and challenging the Delhi Development Authority's (DDA) actions; the appellate court found that the Single Judge had meticulously dealt with all contentions and dismissed
India Law Library Docid # 2435952

(13) SHANKAR Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 26-11-2025
Criminal Law — Appeal against Conviction — Gang Rape (Sections 376D/34 IPC) and POCSO Act (Sections 4/6/10) — Conviction upheld — Child victim’s testimony found consistent, natural, and trustworthy regarding involvement of appellant (one of three perpetrators) in gang rape — Consistency maintained across initial statements (Section 161 CrPC, though initially naming appellant as 'third
India Law Library Docid # 2435953

(14) JHANKAR BANQUETS THROUGH ITS PARTNER MR. MAHESH KAPOOR Vs. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY[DELHI HIGH COURT] 26-11-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 11(5), 11(6), 11(6A), and Section 7 — Appointment of Arbitrator — Existence of Arbitration Agreement — Lease Deed Clause 21 and Licence Deed Clause 19 — Clauses providing for disputes to be decided by Vice Chairman (VC), DDA, whose decision shall be final and binding — These clauses fulfil the requirements of Section 7 as they are in writing,
India Law Library Docid # 2435954

(15) SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN Vs. KIRAN CHADHA[DELHI HIGH COURT] 26-11-2025
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e) — Eviction Petition — Bona Fide Requirement — Revision Petition — Scope of Interference — Unchallenged findings by the Rent Controller regarding the landlady's bona fide requirement and lack of alternative accommodation are deemed admitted during the revision proceedings, thus narrowing the scope of the challenge.
India Law Library Docid # 2435955

(16) ANKEM VENKATA SWAMY Vs. IMMANNI SRIRAMACHANDRA MURTHY AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 26-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 47 — Execution Application (E.A.) determining rights of Defendant 2 — Scope of C.R.P. — Where the Hon’ble Supreme Court modified a decree, stating that the plaintiff could not proceed against the rights of Defendant 2 (Petitioner), but granted Defendant 2 the liberty to approach the executing court to determine his right, the Defendant 2’s objection application under
India Law Library Docid # 2436117

(17) SRI ADRUSHYA KADESHWARA SWAMIJI Vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 25-11-2025
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) — Section 163 (Corresponding to Section 144 of the erstwhile Code of Criminal Procedure) — Power to Issue Prohibitory Order — Scope and Limitations — The power under Section 163 BNSS (Section 144 CrPC) is an extraordinary, executive power intended to address urgent cases of nuisance or apprehended danger for the immediate
India Law Library Docid # 2435895

(18) VINOD KUMAR BHATIA Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 24-11-2025
Companies Act, 1956 — Section 630 — Wrongful withholding of company property by employee/ex-employee — Conviction for failure to vacate company quarter post-retirement — Scope of High Court's revisional jurisdiction — High Court, while exercising revisional jurisdiction, must assess correctness, legality, and propriety of findings below (concurrent findings of ASJ and ACMM) and should not re-appreciate evidence or interfere unless orders are wholly unreasonable or lead to
India Law Library Docid # 2435956

(19) ENVITECH CONSULTANTS INDIA PVT LTD Vs. RUDRABHISHEK ENTERPRISES LIMITED AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 24-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11 (a) and (d) — Rejection of Plaint — Applicable principles — Power to reject a plaint is a drastic one and conditions must be strictly adhered to — Court must look only at the averments in the plaint and documents annexed; defendant’s defense or arguments in the application are irrelevant — Allegations in the plaint must be taken as correct for deciding the
India Law Library Docid # 2435957

(20) SH. GAURAV KHATTAR Vs. SH. VIRENDER AGGARWAL[DELHI HIGH COURT] 24-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 — Review Petition — Grounds for Review — Alleged error apparent on the face of the record and discovery of new and important evidence — Standard for 'new and important evidence' (Aadhar Card and Bank Passbook showing different address) — Where documents (proof of address) claimed to be new evidence were at all times
India Law Library Docid # 2435958

1
2
3
4
5
»
Last