ive
India Law Library (Website) is free for India Law Library Offline customers only, Please Don't Pay for this website.

User not Logged..
IP Address :18.205.66.93
Latest Cases

(981) M/S.KARAIKAL PORT PRIVATE LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR Vs. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (REVENUE) CUM SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 13.05.2014, granting No Objection Certificate to the Fourth Respondent for setting up of a Petrol/Diesel retail outlet at R.S.No.132/1 and 132/2 of No.37 Vanjore Revenue Village, T.R.Pattinam Coommune Panchayat in Karaikal District by installing 4 underground storage tanks and 6 dispensing pumps to store Petroleum Products and to forbear the third respondent herein from granting licence to the fourth/fifth respondents under the Petrol
India Law Library Docid # 1854078

(982) SURENDRAN Vs. G.SELLADURAI AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT (MADURAI BENCH)] 28-10-2022
This appeal suit has been filed by the 2nd defendant/appellant against the judgment and decree passed by the II Additional District Judge, Tiruchirappalli in O.S.No.111 of 2007, dated 06.08.2012, decreeing the relief of specific performance sought for by the plaintiff/1st respondent.
India Law Library Docid # 1854085

(983) UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs. M/S.UNIK TRADERS, 140, OLD THARAGUPET, BANGALORE- 560053 AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT (BENCH MADURAI)] 28-10-2022
These Writ Appeals have been filed by the Union of India, Director General of Foreign Trade and the Commissioner ofCustoms, against the Common Order passed by the learned Single Judge allowing the Writ Petitions filed by the respondents and thereby declaring the Notification dated 04.06.2008 issued by the Director General of Foreign Trade as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.
India Law Library Docid # 1854350

(984) LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA Vs. THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTE REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR, SHASTRI BHAVAN, STATE OFFICE, CHENNAI - 600 006. AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
The minutes of hearing held on 26.07.2018 before the National Commission for Scheduled Castes at Chennai, which was communicated through letter dated 3rd September 2018 is under challenge in the present writ petition.
India Law Library Docid # 1854364

(985) RAMAN BAKSHI Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
Prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 7.7.2022 (Annexure P-7) passed by respondent no.1 - State of Punjab, whereby the proceedings of the meeting dated 21.3.2022 (Annexure P-6) vide which 52 Councillors are stated to have passed a unanimous resolution expressing no-confidence against respondent no.4-Mayor of the Respondent no.3- Municipal Corporation, Amritsar (hereinafter referred to as the 'respondent Corporation'),
India Law Library Docid # 1854774

(986) LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA Vs. THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTE REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
The minutes of hearing held on 26.07.2018 before the National Commission for Scheduled Castes at Chennai, which was communicated through letter dated 3rd September 2018 is under challenge in the present writ petition.
India Law Library Docid # 1854958

(987) KANAJAM DHANA LAKSHMI Vs. PERNI MANIKUMAR [ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
The plaintiff before the learned trial Court filed this second appeal under Sec. 100 C.P.C. The respondent herein was the 1st defendant before the learned trial Court. O.S.No.85 of 2003 was a suit on promissory note seeking for recovery of money. That was filed by the plaintiff as against three defendants arraying them as defendant Nos.1 to 3. After due trial, the learned Senior Civil Judge at Avanigadda decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff directing defendant No.1 to pay the suit debt al
India Law Library Docid # 1855066

(988) YAMPALA PADMA Vs. G.SRI SATYA TRINATHA [ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
This appeal under Sec. 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act ") has been filed by the Appellants/Claimants challenging the Award dtd. 22/3/2006 delivered by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-Cum District Judge, Nellore in M.V.O.P.No.297 of 2004 granting compensation of Rs.1, 75, 000.00 along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum to the petitioners /claimants i.e., wife and two children of the deceased-Nagaraju, from the date of petition till date of realiz
India Law Library Docid # 1855057

(989) BAYANNA Vs. B.PURUSHOTAM REDDY [ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
This appeal under Sec. 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short "the Act ") has been filed by the appellant/petitioner challenging the judgment and award dt.26/10/2005 delivered by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunalcum-I Additional District Court, Kurnool in M.V.O.P.No.23 of 2004 granting compensation of a sum of Rs.2, 23, 300.00 along with 7.5% interest thereon from the date of the claim petition till the date of realization of the amount to the petitioner on account of injuries susta
India Law Library Docid # 1855019

(990) BHASI V.K. Vs. STATE OF KERALA [KERALA HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
A latest study on the major causes of road accidents shows that out of the total cases of 4, 03, 116 road accidents during the year 2020-21, 59.7% of the road accidents has occurred in rural areas (2, 40, 660) and 40.3% has occurred in urban areas (1, 62, 456). Among this, there are several hit and run accidents. 'Hit and run motor accident' means an accident arising out of the use of a motor vehicle or motor vehicles the identity whereof cannot be ascertained in spite of reasonable efforts for
India Law Library Docid # 1855545

(991) RUCHIKA PUGLANI Vs. AASNA DIGIN AND ANOTHER [DELHI HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
The impugned order dated 15th February 2022, passed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge (the learned ASCJ), invokes Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to stay the trial in CS SCJ 1421/2021 (Ruchika Puglani v. Aasna Digin) pending the outcome of CS ADJ DJ 482/2021 (Aasna Digin v. Pawan Hans Taheem ). Ruchika Puglani, the petitioner before me, is the plaintiff in CS SCJ 1421/2021 (the trial in which has been stayed) and Defendant 2 in CS ADJ DJ 482/2021.
India Law Library Docid # 1856104

(992) AJAY GUPTA Vs. STATE THR CBI [DELHI HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
The appellant, vide the present appeal assails the impugned judgment dated 5.7.2003 and the impugned order on sentence dated 7.7.2003 of the then Special Judge, Delhi in RC No.80(A)/96/CBI/ACB/New Delhi whereby Ajay Gupta, the appellant herein, then posted as Sub-Inspector was convicted qua the commission of offences punishable under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988,
India Law Library Docid # 1856105

(993) TARLOK MASIH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH: L.R. SMT. KANTA DEVI Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [DELHI HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
The petitioner is the widow of one Mr. Tarlok Masih1, who, after joining the Sashastra Seema Bal2 [Special Service Bureau as it then was] on 19.01.1976, completed more than 25 years of service, before taking voluntary retirement as Naik/GD w.e.f. from 01.05.2001. After the death of her husband on 19.08.2011, the petitioner came to know in the year 2017 about introduction of the Assured Career Progression3 Scheme of 09.08.1999 from a batchmate of her late husband. As per her, as her late husband
India Law Library Docid # 1848265

(994) SORIN GROUP ITALIA S.R.L Vs. NEERAJ GARG [DELHI HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as 'Sorin') under provisions of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil 2022/DHC/004476 Procedure, 1908 (CPC) as a summary suit seeking recovery of USD 3,08,203.45/- along with pendent lite and future interest. Sorin and the defendant entered into a Sole Distribution Agreement dated 1st July, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'Agreement'),
India Law Library Docid # 1848266

(995) BHAWAR SINGH GURJAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [DELHI HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
The brief background of the case, as mentioned in the petition, is that for filling up the post of Constables (GD) in various forces i.e. BSF, CRPF, CISF, ITBP, SSB, NIA & SSF and Rifleman in Assam Rifles, respondents had notified an advertisement for conducting Constables (GD) in CAPFs, NIA & SSF and Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles Examination 2015 , to which petitioner also applied by filling online form. According to petitioner, he had filled his first preference as "Assam Rifles" in the online
India Law Library Docid # 1848267

(996) ARRENA OVERSEAS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. M/S BATRA ART PRESS [DELHI HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
By way of the present judgment, I shall dispose of the application filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Order XII R-6 read with Order XIIIA of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking relief of possession. Notice in this application was issued on 19th January, 2018 and reply has been filed on behalf of the defendant. Both sides have also filed written submissions along with judgments in support.
India Law Library Docid # 1848289

(997) RADICAL ARC VENTURES PVT. LTD. Vs. STATE NCT OF DELHI [DELHI HIGH COURT] 28-10-2022
This is a petition filed seeking setting aside of the orders dated 26.07.2021, 15.09.2021 and 18.10.2021 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Mahila Court-02, South East, Saket District Court, Delhi in CT No. 910/2021 titled "Shikha Kanwar v. Rajat Kanwar" qua car bearing registration No. HP12M 1248 make Audi Q7.
India Law Library Docid # 1848290

(998) STATE OF J & K Vs. MUZAFFAR AHMAD HURRA AND ANOTHER [JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (SRINAGAR BENCH)] 28-10-2022
This appeal has been directed against judgment dated 07.09.2012 passed by learned Principal Sessions Judge Bandipora, in a case FIR No. 156/2008 of Police Station Sambal for offences under Sections 366/511/109 of the RPC, 1989 (for short RPC) vide which respondents were acquitted of the charges.
India Law Library Docid # 1848509

(999) PARVAT S/O HARU BHIL AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 28-10-2022
The appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(2 of 1974) [in short Cr.P.C.] against the judgment dated 03.09.2013, passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge Sardarpur, Distt. Dhar (M.P.) in S.T. No.159/2012, whereby the appellants have been convicted under Section 449 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC) and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years with fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default of payment of fine, additional S.I.
India Law Library Docid # 1848672

(1000) DIVYA MALPANI Vs. SAURABH MALPANI [MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 28-10-2022
This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner/plaintiff/wife against the order dated 04.08.2022 passed in HMA Case No.1335 of 2022 by First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Indore whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order 39 Rule 1 & 3 read with Section 151 of C.P.C. and Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has been dismissed.
India Law Library Docid # 1848673

IP Address :18.205.66.93