ive

Latest Cases

(81) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. SHARAD RAMDAS SHELAR [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The Appellant, State of Maharashtra, has preferred present Appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1973 (for short, 'the Cr.P.C.'), impugning the Judgment and Order dated 7th May, 2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-2, Niphad, District Nashik in Sessions Case No.24 of 2010, acquitting the Respondents from the offence punishable under Section 498-A, 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, 'the IPC').Heard Mr. Hulke, learned APP for the

(82) SURESH ANGLOSWAMI NAIDU Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The Appellant (Original Accused No.1), has impugned Judgment and Order dated 20th January, 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge under the POCSO Act, Ichalkaranji, convicting him under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, "the IPC") and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further suffer simple imprisonment for 3 months; under Section 366 of the IPC and is sentenced t

(83) MOHANDAN RUPAJI CHARAN Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 14, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India to release the muddamal vehicle - Tata Truck, bearing RTO registration No. RJ-27-GA-4174, in connection with the FIR being III-C.R. No. 40 of 2019, registered before the Himatnagar Rural Police Station, Dist.: Sabarkantha for the offence punishable under Sections 65(A)(E), 116B, 81, 83 and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act.Heard learned advoca

(84) FARHANBHAI ABDULVAHAB TIMIWALA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India to release the muddamal vehicle - Maruti Suzuki Eeco Car, bearing RTO registration No. GJ-16-CN-0695, in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11821033200544 of 2020, registered before the Limdi Police Station, Dist.: Dahod for the offence punishable under Sections 65(E) and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act.Heard learned advoca

(85) MERUBHAI RANMALBHAI ODEDARA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 14, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India to release the muddamal vehicle - Maruti Suzuki SX4 ZDI (Black Colour) Car, bearing RTO registration No. GJ-10-AP-6191, in connection with the FIR being III-C.R. No. 94 of 2017, registered before the Mahuva Police Station, Dist.: Surat (Rural) for the offence punishable under Section 65(E) of the Prohibition Act.Heard learned advocate Mr.

(86) NAYANABEN NITINKUMAR PATEL Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 14, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India to release the muddamal vehicle - Tata Tigor Car, bearing RTO registration No. GJ-02-CP-1372, in connection with the FIR being III-C.R. No. 308 of 2019, registered before the Shamlaji Police Station, Dist.: Arvalli for the offence punishable under Sections 65(A)(E), 116B, 81, 83 and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act.Heard learned advocate Mr.

(87) PRAKASHPURI SHANKARBHAI GAUSWAMI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 19, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and inherent powers under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Code) seeking to quash and set side the order dated 19.09.2020, passed by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Deesa in Criminal Revision Application No. 83 of 2020 whereby, the learned Sessions Judge was pleased to confirm the order dated 05.09.2020, pas

(88) SANDEEP MADANMOHAN GULATI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 19, 21 and 226 of the Constitution of India to release the muddamal vehicle - Tata Truck, bearing RTO registration No. HR-55-Q-5973, in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11192002201026, registered before the Aslali Police Station, Ahmedabad (Rural), Dist.: Ahmedabad for the offence punishable under Sections 65(E), 116B, 81 and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act.Heard learned advocate

(89) SANDIP ACHHUTANAND RAUT Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to release the muddamal vehicle - Tata Truck, bearing RTO registration No. GJ-02-Z-7004 in connection with the FIR being Prohibition C. R. No. 124 of 2018, registered before the Unava Police Station, Dist. Mehsana for the offence punishable under Sections 65(A)(E), 116B, 81, 83 and 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The petitioner h

(90) MAHIPATSINH LAKHMANBHAI SISODIYA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction to release the muddamal vehicle- Honda Amaze 1.5 SMT (IDTEC) bearing RTO registration No. DL-4C-AW-0886 in connection with the FIR being CR No. 11188008200738 of 2020 registered with Modasa Rural Police Station, District - Arvalli for the offence punishable under Sections 65(A)(E), 116-B and 98(2) of the Gujarat Proh

(91) SAGAR AMARSHIBHAI PARMAR Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction to release the muddamal vehicle- Skoda Fabia Ambiente 1.2 MPI of maker Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd bearing RTO registration No. GJ-06-DB-3053 in connection with the FIR being CR No. 11213023200682 of 2020 registered with Jetpur Taluka Police Station, District - Rajkot Rural for the offence punishable under Sections 65(

(92) HANIFBHAI NUMAHAMMAD SONI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction to release the muddamal vehicle- Mahindra and Mahindra Limited Bolero Pick Up bearing RTO registration No. GJ-34-T-0254 in connection with the FIR being III- CR No. 590 of 2019 registered with Chhotaudepur Police Station, District - Chhotaudepur for the offence punishable under Sections 65(E), 116-B, 81, 83 and 98(2)

(93) SAJJANSING GULABSING CHAUHAN Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction so also inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash and set aside the order dated 10.10.2019 in Muddamal Misc. Application No. 209 of 2019 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class Court at Savli and to release the muddamal vehicle- Mahindra -Xylo four wheeler Car bearing RT

(94) JAYANTIBHAI RAMJIBHAI CHAVDA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & OTHERS [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction to release the muddamal vehicle- Mahindra Bolero bearing RTO registration No. GJ-13-AT-7059 in connection with the FIR being CR NO. III- 116 of 2019 registered with Thangadh Police Station, District - Surendranagar for the offence punishable under Sections 65(A)(E), 116-B, 81 and 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act.

(95) RANJITBHAI SHANIYABHAI RATHWA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction to this Court under Articles 226 and 227of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction to release the muddamal vehicle- Motor Cycle- HF Delux (I3S-SELF-DRUM-CAST) (Make- Hero Motocorp Ltd) bearing RTO registration No. GJ-34-E-3188 in connection with the FIR being CR NO. III- 175 of 2018 registered with Panvad Police Station, District - Chhotaudepur for the offence punishable under Sections 65(E

(96) RATANBHAI NAGJIBHAI KALOTARA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & OTHERS [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction to release the muddamal vehicle- Maruti Ertiga VXI- Car bearing RTO registration No. GJ-07-BN-1267 in connection with the FIR being CR No. 11208002200104 of 2020 registered with Ajidam Police Station, District - Rajkot City for the offence punishable under Sections 65(E), 116-B, 81 and 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibitio

(97) JAYESHKUMAR RANCHHODBHAI RATHOD Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 14, 19, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and inherent powers under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Code) seeking to release the muddamal vehicle - Maruti Suzuki Wagon R Car, bearing RTO registration No. GJ-05-CS-6306 in connection with the FIR being CR. No. 11214021200681 of 2020, registered before the Kosamba Police Station, Dist. Surat (Rural) for the

(98) KAMLESHBHAI ARVINDBHAI NAYKA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and inherent powers under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Code) seeking to quash and set aside the order dated 03.09.2020 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ghoghamba in Muddamal Application No. 50 of 2020 and to release the muddamal vehicle - Maruti Suzuki Eeco Car, bearing RTO registration No. GJ-07-BB-2

(99) GIGAN DHANABHAI MUCHHAL Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction to release the muddamal vehicle- Car being Honda City EXI MT of Honda Cars India Pvt Ltd bearing RTO registration No. GJ-05-CF-4488 in connection with the FIR being CR No. 11203039200482 of 2020 registered with Mendarda Police Station, District - Junagadh for the offence punishable under Sections 65(E), 81 and 98(2)

(100) SUNIL RAJBONGSHI Vs. STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS [GAUHATI HIGH COURT] 25-11-2020
Heard Ms. R. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. Mazumder, learned counsel for the Secondary Education Department.The petitioner was appointed as a Grade-IV staff on an honorary basis as per the resolution N.3 of the managing committee of Sankardev Balika Vidyapith High School on 15.11.1993. The petitioner states that when teaching and non-teaching staff of Sankardev Balika Vidyapith High School were provincialised under the Assam Venture Education Institutions (Provinc