ive
India Law Library (Website) is free for India Law Library Offline customers only, Please Don't Pay for this website.

User not Logged..
IP Address :18.205.66.93
Latest Cases

(81) GORDON KYNSAI NONGKYNRIH Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT] 01-12-2022
The brief facts of the case are that the National Institute of Electronic and Information Technology (NIELIT) formerly known as Department of Electronics and Accreditation of Computer Course (DOEACC) till 10.10.2011, issued an advertisement on 25.02.2010, inviting applications for recruitment to various vacant sanctioned post including 3 sanctioned posts of Scientist/Engineer 'C' on regular basis. The writ petitioner who was having the qualification of MSc Computer Science, and was then holding
India Law Library Docid # 1848771

(82) PINAKI DAS Vs. NORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. AND OTHERS [MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT] 01-12-2022
The writ petitioner being aggrieved with the appointment of an Inquiry Officer from outside the respondent Corporation, to inquire into the charges framed against the petitioner, on the ground that, the Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules (CDA Rules) does not provide for the same, seeks a mandamus to set aside the said appointment, as also the pending disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner.
India Law Library Docid # 1848772

(83) NORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. (NEEPCO) WORKERS UNION AND OTHERS Vs. NORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. AND OTHERS [MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT] 01-12-2022
The brief facts of the case are that the respondent Corporation NEEPCO by an office order dated 22.04.2021 in the Conduct Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1980 governing all employees, had inserted Sub-Rule (iii) in Rule 8 of the said Rules which stipulated that no employees to whom the said Rules apply shall seek membership of any registered trade union or indulge in trade union activities. The petitioners 1, 2 and 3 being the Employees Workers Union in the NEEPCO and its office bearers petitioners
India Law Library Docid # 1848773

(84) AATMA RAM SHARMA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 01-12-2022
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for the same recruitment, similarly situated petitioners had approached Jaipur Bench of this Court in Om Prakash & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21214/2017, which writ petition has been decided on 21.11.2017 granting relief to the petitioner in light of judgment in the case of Hemlata Shrimali & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3247/2015, decided on 1.4.2015 and relying upo
India Law Library Docid # 1848788

(85) KISHAN LAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 01-12-2022
By way of filing present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed validity and correctness of the order dated 10.07.2019 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in Original Application (OA) No.290/000299/2013, by which the Tribunal dismissed the OA preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 30.11.2012 passed by disciplinary authority imposing punishment of 'removal of service' upon the petitioner as affirmed by appellate authori
India Law Library Docid # 1848918

(86) MANJU DHUNDAWAT Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANOTHER [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 01-12-2022
In response to the petition it has been indicated that the petitioner has not produced the mark-sheet of first year graduation where she had studied the computer application subject and only the final year mark-sheet was produced and, therefore, for lack of requisite computer qualification, she was held ineligible.
India Law Library Docid # 1848919

(87) ARAPPOR IYAKKAM AND OTHERS Vs. THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF VIGILANCE & ANTI CORRUPTION NO.293, MKN ROAD ALANDUR, CHENNAI 600 016 AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 30-11-2022
In view of the commonality of the facts, the decision in the four cases at hand, viz., W.P. No.34845 of 2018 and Crl.O.P. Nos.23428 of 2018 and 21564 and 21565 of 2022, will be governed by this common order.
India Law Library Docid # 1854931

(88) LAKHAN @ LAXMAN Vs. ANKITA LAXMAN KALE [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 30-11-2022
By this petition, the petitioner assails order dtd. 18/6/2020 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Shrigonda awarding interim maintenance of Rs.1, 500.00 per month to the respondent-wife under Sec. 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act in H. M. P. No. 125 of 2018.
India Law Library Docid # 1855199

(89) RAHUL P.U. Vs. GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY [KERALA HIGH COURT] 30-11-2022
The question posed for consideration in these writ petitions is whether any mineral, tool, equipment, vehicle or any other thing can be seized under Sec. 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and whether seized articles are liable to be confiscated under Sec. 21(4A), when no Special Court is constituted as contemplated under Sec. 30B of the Act, 1957. The petitioners would urge that seizure cannot be effected when no Special Court is notified under Sec. 30B.
India Law Library Docid # 1855535

(90) RAJBIR AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF HARYANA [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 30-11-2022
Since all the appeals respectively bearing number CRA-D- 1104-DB-2015, number CRA-S-2762-SB-2015, and, number CRA-S- 2763-SB-2015 arise from a common verdict, made by the learned trial Judge concerned, hence all the appeals (supra) are amenable for a common verdict being made thereons.
India Law Library Docid # 1856254

(91) RAJESH KUMAR Vs. SHASHI BALA [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 30-11-2022
Petitioner/tenant is impugning the concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below, i.e. the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority, vide which he was ordered to be evicted from the demised premises. The parties to the lis hereinafter shall be referred to by their original position in the eviction petition.
India Law Library Docid # 1856309

(92) SALAHUDDIN Vs. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRIN.SECY. HOME LUCKNOW AND OTHERS [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (LUCKNOW BENCH)] 30-11-2022
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is aged about 60 years and is suffering from various diseases, who is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to enmity and village party bandi. No such incident as alleged by the prosecution took place. The entire prosecution has been lodged with intention to defame the image of the applicant and is entire family members in the society.
India Law Library Docid # 1848004

(93) SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT DEPTT OF POST AND OTHERS Vs. BUNDU AND ANOTHER [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 30-11-2022
By the present writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the award/order dated 30.09.2014, passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, Moradabad awarding compensation to the extent of Rs. 4,500/- each to the applicants in Application No. 153 of 2013 on account of loss of the articles sent by speed-post by the complainants which contained their passports and demand drafts.
India Law Library Docid # 1848084

(94) SECURITIES & TIME SHARE OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION Vs. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA AND OTHERS [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 30-11-2022
This petition has been filed as a public interest litigation by the petitioner-society purportedly established to protect the interest of investors in Time Share Companies seeking direction to the Respondents to regulate the Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Scheme (CIS) under Securities & Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (as amended in 2014) (the "SEBI Act") and the Collective Investment Schemes Regulations, 1999 (the "CIS Regulations").
India Law Library Docid # 1848098

(95) DEVCHARAN Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 30-11-2022
This criminal revision is directed against the judgment dated 21.10.2014 passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti, District-Janjgir Champa, in Criminal Appeal No.92/2014, whereby conviction under Section 414 of the IPC awarded by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jaijaipur in Criminal Case No.218/2014 vide judgment dated 29.9.2014 has been altered under Section 403 of the IPC
India Law Library Docid # 1848170

(96) D.P. VIPRA COLLEGE THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL AND ANOTHER Vs. ATAL VIHARI BAJPAYEE UNIVERSITY AND ANOTHER [CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 30-11-2022
The petitioner No.1 is a college which has filed the present petition through its principal assailing the order dated 03.10.2019 (Annexure P/16) whereby respondent No.1 Executive Council, University stayed the suspension. Thereafter, a corrigendum dated 18.11.2019 (Annexure P/19) has been issued by the University, by which it has been observed that due to typographical error suspension has been typed whereas it should be termination from service which will not effective till the approval granted
India Law Library Docid # 1848228

(97) NANDAKUMAR T.P Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND OTHERS [KERALA HIGH COURT] 30-11-2022
Two different orders were passed in C.P.No.4/2014 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam i.e. on 24/12/2014 and 6/7/2015. It is against the order dated 06/7/2015 in C.M.P.No.2637/2015, the brother of deceased V.Saseendran, the defacto complainant came up in Crl.R.P.No.1502/2015 and against the order in Crl.M.P.No.4364/2014 dated 24/12/2014, the petitioner therein one Nandakumar, a journalist and a public activist came up in Crl.M.C.No.929/2015. The application- Crl.M.P.2637/2015 is against
India Law Library Docid # 1848651

(98) SHINE P. JACOB AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS [KERALA HIGH COURT] 30-11-2022
This Crl.Revision Petition has been directed against the judgment in Crl.Appeal No.121/2021 dated 21st December, 2021 on the file of Principal Sessions Court, Kollam (for short, 'the appellate court') confirming the order in CMP No. 2348/2019 in MC No.21/2019 dated 27th February, 2021 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Pathanapuram (for short, the trial court).
India Law Library Docid # 1848652

(99) RAJENDRA SINGH @ RAJU SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 30-11-2022
Brief facts of the case, as the pleaded facts and a perusal of the record would reveal, are that on 22.08.2022, the police officer-Om Prakash, in the course of his official duty, received some information, from an informant, about the location of Virendra Sharma @ Ladu, a henchman (gurga) of the present petitioner Rajendra Singh @ Raju Singh, a convict imprisoned in Bikaner Central Jail, and that he was at 80 Feet Road and has in his possession an illegal (avaidh) pistol, which he was carrying w
India Law Library Docid # 1848789

(100) SUMAN GURUNG Vs. STATE OF SIKKIM [SIKKIM HIGH COURT] 30-11-2022
The Appellant was convicted of the offences under Section 376(2)(n) and Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter, the "IPC"), with Section 5(j)(ii) and Section 5(l), punishable under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter the "POCSO" Act), vide the Judgment dated 15-07-2021, in Sessions Trial (POCSO) Case No.07 of 2020, by the Court of Learned Special Judge (POCSO), West Sikkim, at Gyalshing.
India Law Library Docid # 1848921

IP Address :18.205.66.93