ive

Latest Cases

(81) SATISH MEENA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 17-09-2020
Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outsets ubmits that identically situated person namely Mr. Vinod Kumar Chobisa, has been accorded notional benefits from 28th January, 2008, whereas the petitioners, have been declined the same treatment and thus, the action of the State - respondents is discriminatory and in violation to the mandate of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Learned counsel further submits that for the present, the petitioners would be satisfied, if the State-re

(82) AJAY KUMAR MEHRA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 17-09-2020
Mr. Jangid, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for the same recruitment, Jaipur Bench of this Court in the case of Om Prakash & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21214/2017, vide its order dated 21.11.2017 granted relief to the petitioners following the judgment in the case of Hemlata Shrimali & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3247/2015, decided on 1.4.2015, which was based upon adjudication made in the case of Suman Bai

(83) BRIJMOHAN LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 17-09-2020
Mr. Jangid, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for the same recruitment, Jaipur Bench of this Court in the case of Om Prakash & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21214/2017, vide its order dated 21.11.2017 granted relief to the petitioners following the judgment in the case of Hemlata Shrimali & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3247/2015, decided on 1.4.2015, which was based upon adjudication made in the case of Suman Bai

(84) DEVRAJ Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 17-09-2020
Taking into consideration the rise in COVID-19 cases, specifically at Jodhpur and Jaipur, the functioning of Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur from 14.09.2020 to 01.10.2020 shall be only through video conferencing. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellants, who are in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 0140/2020, Police Station Banar, District Jodhpur, registered for the offenc

(85) JITENDRA DANGI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 17-09-2020
Mr. Jangid, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for the same recruitment, Jaipur Bench of this Court in the case of Om Prakash & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21214/2017, vide its order dated 21.11.2017 granted relief to the petitioners following the judgment in the case of Hemlata Shrimali & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3247/2015, decided on 1.4.2015, which was based upon adjudication made in the case of Suman Bai

(86) SUKHJINDRA KAUR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 17-09-2020
The present writ petition has been preferred for the following reliefs: "1. By any writ order or direction, the respondents may be directed to grant all the death benefits including Pension, GPF claim, gratuity, Insurance claim, leave encashment claims etc. of the service of the deceased to the petitioner. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. The writ p

(87) RAM NIWAS DHAKAD Vs. DIRECTOR, ELEMENTARY EDU, RAJ, BIKANER [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 17-09-2020
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the case of the petitioners is similar to that of petitioners in Suman Jhanwar & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5405/2012), decided on 12.02.2015, whereby this Court directed the petitioners to file appropriate representation before the appointing authority and on filing of such representation, the petitioners therein have been granted the requisite relief by the respondents and, therefore, the present pe

(88) RAMJANAM YADAV Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 17-09-2020
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent, he has not committed the alleged offence, but he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that only one case have been shown against the applicant in the Gang Chart? and in the said case, the applicant has been granted bail copy of the bail order has been annexed to the affidavit filed in support of bail

(89) MANARAM NAVARAM GAMAR Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 16-09-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction to this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction so also inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to release the muddamal vehicle- MARUTI EECO bearing RTO registration No. RJ-24-UA-0934 in connection with the FIR being CR. No.III - 183/2019 before the Amirgarh Police Station, at Banaskantha for the offence punishable under Sectio

(90) CHAUHAN VAJUSING DALPATSINH Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 16-09-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction so also inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to release the muddamal vehicle- Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., bearing RTO registration No. GJ-18-BA-6431 in connection with the FIR being CR. No.11195035200264 before the Palanpur Taluka Police Station, for the offences punishable under

(91) VINOD CHANDUBHAI BHALIYA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 16-09-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction so also inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to release the muddamal vehicle- Pulsar 200 DTS. I.F. Motor Cycle bearing RTO registration No. GJ-06-MB-9019 in connection with the FIR being CR. No. III - 431 of 2019 before the Bapod Police Station, District-Vadodara City for the o

(92) DHANJIBHAI ARJANBHAI MAKWANA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 16-09-2020
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to invoke inherent jurisdiction vested under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to release the muddamal vehicle-Tractor bearing RTO registration No. GJ-14-AK-4366 in connection with the FIR being CR. No. - 11193004200623 of 2020 before the Amreli (Rural) Police Station, District- Amreli for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indiand Penal Code and under Section

(93) LALITBHAI JERAMBHAI KANBHI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 16-09-2020
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to invoke inherent jurisdiction vested under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to release the muddamal vehicle-Tractor bearing RTO registration No. GJ-14-AK-2273 in connection with the FIR being CR. No. - 11193004200623 of 2020 before the Amreli (Rural) Police Station, District- Amreli for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 2

(94) PIYUSHBHAI PRAVINBHAI JARIWALA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 16-09-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction so also inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to release the muddamal vehicle- Chevrolet Cruize, White Colour Car bearing RTO registration No. GJ-21-AA-9611 in connection with the FIR being CR. No. III - 1150 of 2019 before the Udhna Police Station, District- Surat for the offen

(95) UMESHBHAI AKSHAYBHAI GOSAI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 16-09-2020
This application is filed by the applicant - accused under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with I-C.R. No. 80/2019, registered with Kalol Police Station, District: Panchmahals for the offences punishable under sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) and 506(2) of IPC and sections 4, 6 and 12 of the POCSO Act as well as section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. Heard learned advocate Mr. S. K. Trivedi for the applicant and learned APP Mr.

(96) JALARAM DHIMARAM BISHNOI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 16-09-2020
This Application is filed by the Applicant - Accused under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with C.R. No. 11191048201408/2020 registered with Sarkej Police Station, District Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 66(2), 65(a), 65(e), 81 and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Tejas M. Barot for the Applicant and learned APP Mr. H.K.Patel for the Respondent State through Video Conference. Rul

(97) RAMESH SHANKAR TABIYAD Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 16-09-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction so also inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to release the muddamal vehicle- Renault-Motor car bearing RTO registration No. GJ-01-RB-5382 in connection with the FIR being CR. No. 11209020200735 of 2020 before the Idar Police Station, at Sabarkantha for the offence punishable u

(98) RAJUBHAI MOHANBHAI GOHIL Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 16-09-2020
This Application is filed by the Applicant - Accused under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with I-C.R. No.79/2020 registered with Dakor Police Station, District Kheda for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(1) (N) of IPC and Sections 3(a), 4, 5(1), 6, 17 and 18 of POCSO. Heard learned Advocate Mr.P.B.Khambholja for the Applicant and learned APP Ms. Moxa Thakkar for the Respondent State through Video Confe

(99) AMMIREDDY VENKATA LAKSHMI GALI RAMANAMMA Vs. STATE [ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 16-09-2020
This petition is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is A-1 in Crime No.354 of 2020 of Gannavaram Police Station, Krishna District. The offences registered against her are under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short "N.D.P.S. Act"). It is the case of the prosecution that on 08.06.2020, the petitioner along with other accused was found to be illegally tran

(100) MEDIDI PEDAVEERRAJU Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 16-09-2020
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief: "....to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the Respondent No.4 in demanding the Petitioner to vacate and hand over the lease hold agricultural land and trying to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over the said land of an extent of Ac.1-92 cents in Sy.No.11 of P.Vemavaram Village, Samarlakota Mandal, East Godavari District,