ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(81) NANDYALA VENKATESWARA REDDY Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA [TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 16-11-2023
Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923
India Law Library Docid # 2400699

(82) SHRI. IBRINGSTAR MAWLONG Vs. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND OTHERS [MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT] 16-11-2023
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 302 and 334
India Law Library Docid # 2400711

(83) TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD DEVASWOM HEAD QUARTERS Vs. DEPUTY EXAMINER FOR LOCAL FUND AUDIT KERALA STATE AUDIT DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS [KERALA HIGH COURT] 15-11-2023
Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 - Section 1, 1(3), 3, 4 and 15
India Law Library Docid # 2400683

(84) V. BHASKARAN SREEKRISHNA BHAVAN AND OTHERS Vs. GREESHMA PRASAD AND OTHERS [KERALA HIGH COURT] 15-11-2023
Transfer of matrimonial Case - A mere apprehension that justice will not be done in a given case is not sufficient for transfer of a case from one particular court to another.
India Law Library Docid # 2400685

(85) THE APSRTC., Vs. VADDE SUJATHA ANOTHER [ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 15-11-2023
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140 and 166 - Motor Accident - Deceased sustained multiple grievous injuries and died on the spot is due to shock and haemorrhage - Appellant/APSRTC did not elicit any material fact to probable its plea that deceased was equally responsible for the accident - Appellant did not examine its driver to speak about the way in which the accident occurred - There are no grounds to interfere with the finding of the learned Tribunal, as the evidence placed before the l
India Law Library Docid # 2400674

(86) SANAPALA VIDYASAGAR VINAY Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 15-11-2023
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Sections 437 and 439 - Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 341, 384, 304(ii) and 338 - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 185, 134(a), 180 and 181 - Bail - Accusation made against the accused is that the petitioner/A1 drove the car in a rash and negligent manner and dashed one tree on the divider and one motorcycle on the other road, resulting the rider and pillion rider of the motorcycle died on the spot - Case under Section 304(ii) IPC is registered against
India Law Library Docid # 2400675

(87) JAGAR SINGH Vs. UT OF J&K THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND OTHERS [JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT] 15-11-2023
Jammu and Kashmir Police Rules 1960 - Rule 698 - Deletion of name in Surveillance Register - Continuation of the entry of the name of the petitioner in the Surveillance Register seemingly is being continued by the respondents without drawing any subjective satisfaction in this regard mechanically being a person reasonably believed to be habitual offender - No reasons muchless cogent and credible have been recorded in the Surveillance Register for continuing the name of the petitioner therein on
India Law Library Docid # 2400681

(88) HAMSA.A.P. AND OTHERS Vs. SECRETARY KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. AND OTHERS [KERALA HIGH COURT] 15-11-2023
Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 17(2), 3(4) and 3(1-AA) - Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 146 - District Magistrate has the power to consider a requisition for removal of telegraph line or post other than that of a local authority - However, in order to exercise the said power, acting on the requisition of the person aggrieved, the dispute must be in relation to electric/telegraph lines and electric/telegraph posts - Definitions of 'telegraph line' and 'post' provided under Sections 3(4) and 3(
India Law Library Docid # 2400682

(89) BASTIN BABU Vs. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM AND OTHERS [KERALA HIGH COURT] 15-11-2023
Kerala Municipality Standing Committee Rules, 2000 - Rule 11 - Casting of a valid vote - Whether a candidate has cast his vote for himself in the elections to the Chairman of a Standing Committee to a local authority - Held, a voter's intention is not what is expressed subsequent to the casting of the ballot - Intention has to be manifested through the ballot, in the manner provided, that too, at the time when he exercised his right of franchise. Subsequent assertions or expressions of the voter
India Law Library Docid # 2400684

(90) GURUDWARA GURDARSHAN PARKASH AND ANOTHER Vs. RASHPAL SINGH AND OTHERS [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 15-11-2023
Appointment of Receiver - A Receiver cannot be appointed to deprive a party of a de facto possession - Appointment of Receiver is considered to be very harsh remedy and such jurisdiction should be exercised only in extreme case with utmost care and caution - A Receiver can only be appointed if it appears to the Court to be just and convenient.
India Law Library Docid # 2400713

(91) TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD DEVASWOM HEAD QUARTERS Vs. DEPUTY EXAMINER FOR LOCAL FUND AUDIT KERALA STATE AUDIT DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS [KERALA HIGH COURT] 15-11-2023
Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 - Section 1, 1(3), 3, 4 and 15
India Law Library Docid # 2400683

(92) JAJATI KESHARI MOHANTY Vs. STATE OF ODISHA AND OTHERS [ORISSA HIGH COURT] 14-11-2023
Indian Registration Act, 1908 (Orissa Amendment) - Section 52(1), Section 61(2) and Section 80A — Orissa Registration Rules, 1988 - Rule 100 (1) & Rule 100 (2)
India Law Library Docid # 2400687

(93) CHINMAYA SAHU AND ANOTHER Vs. AMIT KUMAR SAHU [ORISSA HIGH COURT] 14-11-2023
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) - Order 9 Rule 13 - Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 123 - Setting aside of ex parte decree - Petition under Order IX Rule 13 CPC was filed beyond the statutory period of thirty days, as provided under Article 123 of the Limitation Act, the petition should have accompanied with the petition for condonation of delay - In absence of any application for condonation of delay, learned Courts have committed no error in rejecting the petition under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, a
India Law Library Docid # 2400688

(94) RAM NARAYAN RAJBHOR Vs. GEETA GHOSH @ GEETA KALITA AND OTHERS [GAUHATI HIGH COURT] 14-11-2023
Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 67 - Production and exhibition of a registered Sale Deed - There is a presumption that a registered document is validly executed and a registered document therefore prima face would be valid in law and the onus to prove against such registered document would be on a person who leads evidence to rebut the presumption - In the event the respondents defendants intend to take a stand that the contents of the registered Sale Deed do not prove the right, title and interest
India Law Library Docid # 2400676

(95) TINU PHILIP Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS [KERALA HIGH COURT] 13-11-2023
The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1924 of 2023 of Palarivattom Police Station, Ernakulam District, alleging the commission of offence under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner while working as a cleaning staff in a hotel in Kochi, had gone to the room of the de-facto complainant, who was staying in the hotel and committed rape on her.
India Law Library Docid # 2400615

(96) VISHNU Vs. STATE OF KERALA [KERALA HIGH COURT] 13-11-2023
The petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No. 947 of 2023 of Kunnamkulam Police station, Thrissur, for having committed offences punishable under Sections 22(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.
India Law Library Docid # 2400617

(97) MURALEEDHARAN UNNI K.N, @ MURALEEDHARAN UNNI KAKOOTH NAIR Vs. SUPERINTENDENT OF CUSTOMS AND OTHERS [KERALA HIGH COURT] 13-11-2023
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) - Sections 21, 23, 28, 29, 30 and 37 - Regular Bail - Quantity of Heroin is 18 kg, the rigour under Sec.37 would apply and therefore, without satisfying the twin conditions provided therein, bail cannot be considered - It is relevant to note that the petitioner, who has been nabbed and detained in custody on the allegation that he was found in possession of commercial quantity of contraband, seeks regular bail and the same is subject to
India Law Library Docid # 2400614

(98) SAHEER Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS [KERALA HIGH COURT] 13-11-2023
Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 - Section 3 read with Section 4 - Triple talaq - Quashing of FIR - Talaq that has been made punishable under the Act means talaq-e-biddat or any other similar form of talaq having the effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce pronounced by a Muslim husband [See Section 2(c) of the Act] - The pronouncement of talaq-e-sunnat either by Ahsan form or Hasan form has not been made penal in the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriag
India Law Library Docid # 2400616

(99) PRADEEPTHAI @ AKASHTHAI Vs. STATE OF KERALA [KERALA HIGH COURT] 13-11-2023
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 302 - Murder - Circumstancial evidence - Only circumstances proved are that the accused and the deceased were found together a few hours prior to the occurrence and that the accused absconded after the occurrence - These circumstances might be sufficient in some cases to hold the accused guilty of the offence alleged, but not in all cases - In the case on hand, inasmuch as there is no material other than the oral evidence tendered by PW28 and PW29 that the accus
India Law Library Docid # 2400618

(100) BISHNU MAJHI; AND NILAKANTHA MAJHI Vs. RAIDHAR MAJHI AND OTHERS [ORISSA HIGH COURT] 13-11-2023
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 100 — Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 63 — Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 68
India Law Library Docid # 2400690