(41) ABEEB C.S. Vs. CHELLANAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH [KERALA HIGH COURT] 05-12-2022 An order was passed by Munsiff Court, Kochi (for short 'the court below') in I.A. No.5/2021 in O.S. No.166 of 2020 and that is sought to be reversed in the Original Petition. I.A. No.5 of 2021 is also sought to be dismissed consequentially. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff in O.S. No.166 of 2020 on the files of Munsiff Court, Kochi. The suit was instituted there for a mandatory injunction "to effect transfer of registry in the digital registers of the Panchayat" with respect to a building India Law Library Docid # 1855502
(42) SUBASH KUNDRA @ KATTY Vs. KIRAN BHALLA AND OTHERS [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 05-12-2022 The petitioner filed a suit for grant of decree of declaration that members of the Ram Lila Committee (registered) Society have not been registered as per the amended rules and regulations of the Committee with a consequential relief of permanent injunction. The plaintiff impleaded his own brother Sh. Sanjeev Kundra as the President of the Society. India Law Library Docid # 1856295
(43) RAJ MANGAL GOND Vs. STATE OF U P AND OTHERS [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 05-12-2022 The petitioner who claimed himself to be a Gond with a permanent domicile of Village Kasamriya, District Maharajganj had a Caste Certificate of being a Scheduled Caste which was dated 6.6.1996. However, when the parliament in the exercise of its power under Article 342(2) of the Constitution of India brought the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Orders (Amendment) Act, 2002 and had considered Gond Caste residing in the District Maharajganj to be of the Scheduled Tribe, the petitioner again app India Law Library Docid # 1848000
(44) MUMTAZIM AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U.P. [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (LUCKNOW BENCH)] 05-12-2022 This appeal under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C has been preferred by the convicted appellants Muntazim, Mustaqim, Rhimuddin and Idris against the judgment and order dated 19.09.1984 passed by Shri H.L. Kurel III-Additional Sessions Judge, Barabanki in Sessions Trial No. 241 of 1982 convicting and sentencing the appellants under Section 147 IPC to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment, and to further undergo 11/2 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 148 IPC and to undergo life imprisonment under India Law Library Docid # 1848001
(45) SUPER SEAL FLEXIBLE HOSE LIMITED THRU ITS AUTH. SIGNATORY Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 05-12-2022 The notice which was served upon the petitioner was a notice under sections 17, 27, 33, 40, 47-A and 64 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 read with Rules 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the Uttar Pradesh Stamp (Valuation of Property) Rules, 1997. The notice was to the effect that the document i.e. the lease deed which was executed by the U.P. State Industrial Development Corporation-respondent no.4 (hereinafter referred to as the "UPSIDC") on 17.12.2007 had not stated about certain properties which were leased ou India Law Library Docid # 1848088
(46) R.CHANDRASEKAR Vs. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME (TRANSPORT) DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT (MADURAI BENCH)] 02-12-2022 The prayer made in this writ petition is for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take action against the vehicle owners, who are violating Rules 50 and 51 of the Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, based on the proceedings of the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.E4/22847/2021-2, dated 30.05.2022. India Law Library Docid # 1854365
(47) M/S. RAYMOND PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. UNION OF INDIA ND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 This writ petition has been filed challenging the order of the second respondent dated 17.07.2012, passed under Section 22 of the Companies Act, 1956 directing the petitioner to change the name of its registered company within a period of three months from the date of the said order. India Law Library Docid # 1854373
(48) MO. HASAN MEHNDI HASAN SHEIKH Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 The petitioner has been convicted for various offences including the one under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (for short "TADA "). The petitioner is now seeking his release on regular parole for the purpose of seeing his ailing wife. An application was also filed by the petitioner seeking his release on regular parole but it was rejected by respondent No.2 on the ground that the petitioner is not eligible for grant of regular parole in terms of rule 4(13) read wit India Law Library Docid # 1855180
(49) RAVIRAJ RAJENDRA PATIL Vs. GRAM PANCHAYAT BACHNI [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 Respondent No.2 - Iqbal was elected as a Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Bachani, Taluka : Kagal, District : Kolhapur on 25/3/2019. He was elected for the seat reserved for backward class. As mandated, as per the provisions of Sec. 30(1A) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, he could not produce the caste validity certificate within a period of twelve months. Though applied before the Caste Verification Committee, in time, he could get it belatedly on 27/10/2020. Learned Collector - District Ko India Law Library Docid # 1855150
(50) PARUL BHARAT SHAH Vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges assessment order dtd. 2/9/2022 passed under Sec. 143(3) read with Sec. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( "the Act "), notice of demand dtd. 2/9/2022 issued under Sec. 156 of the Act and show-cause notice dtd. 2/9/2022 for initiating penalty proceedings under Sec. 274 read with Sec. 270A of the said Act.
(51) RAJENDRA Vs. ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dtd. 11/1/2021 passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Parbhani provisionally accepting change reported by the rival group of respondents under the provisions of sub-sec. (2) of Sec. 22 of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1950 '). Petitioners in Writ Petition No.3788 of 2021 filed their objections to the order dtd. 11/1/2021, which has been repelled India Law Library Docid # 1855214
(52) ARUNKUMAR Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 In the year 1973 the Firm namely M/s Akot Wine Mart was constituted and licence for wine shop (Country and foreign liquor) was obtained in the name of M/s Akot Wine Mart. On 1/11/1978, the firm was reconstituted and three persons namely Vijaykumar Dwarkalal Jaiswal, Arunkumar Dwarkalal Jaiswal (Appellant) and Dinkarrao Pundlikrao Gawande were the partners of the firm. On 1/9/1992 a fresh deed of partnership was executed and as per Clause 10, on the death of a partner the firm was not to be disso India Law Library Docid # 1855097
(53) POOJA Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 By this petition, the petitioner is seeking issuance of mandamus for transferring of Crime No.166/2022 registered by Police Station Wadi, Nagpur for an offence punishable under Sec. 306 of the Indian Penal Code against boyfriend of deceased daughter of the petitioner. According to learned counsel for the petitioner there is enough material for this Court to come to the conclusion that the investigation carried out by Wadi Police Station is done in a pathetic, indifferent and even negligent manne India Law Library Docid # 1855105
(54) ANNU INFRA CONSTRUCT (I) PVT. LTD Vs. RAMESH NAIK [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 The appellant challenges the judgment and award dtd. 30/8/2019 in Claim Petition No. 101/2015, awarding the claimants compensation of Rs.9, 85, 000.00 inclusive of no-fault liability amount with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till effective payment. This compensation is awarded by the Tribunal on account of the death of the claimant's 36-year-old son in an accident arising from the use of a motor vehicle on 20/2/2014 India Law Library Docid # 1855109
(55) STATE Vs. AMBRARAI PIRAPPA VATEVATI [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 This is an appeal filed by the State through Ponda Police Station thereby challenging the acquittal of the respondent dtd. 25/2/2011 in Criminal Case No. 61/S/2009/B for the offences punishable under Sec. 279, 304- A of Indian Penal Code (I.P.C., for short) and Sec. 134(a) and (b) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (M.V. Act, for short).
(56) PRADIP Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 By way of instant proceedings, applicants herein are seeking exercise of powers u/s 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing and nullifying crime vide FIR No. 270 of 2021 registered at Amalner Police Station, District Jalgaon for the offences punishable under Sec. 498-A, 323, 504, 506 of IPC and the consequential charge sheet vide R.C.C. No. 25 of 2022 pending on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Amalner. India Law Library Docid # 1855082
(57) M/S. MEHRA & CO. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 This application is filed for appointment of arbitrator under sub sec. 6 of sec. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act of 1996" for the sake of brevity).
(58) LAVINO KAPUR COTTON PVT. LTD. Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CGST [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 Whether the order passed by Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, holding that the appellate company is entitled to interest u/s. 11BB of the Act only after three months of the fling of refund applications after the Tribunal Order granting refund is contrary to the decision of the Supreme court in the case of Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. UoI 2011-TIOL-105-SC-CX wherein the Supreme Court held that the interest is to be granted from the expiry of three months from the date of fling of the initial refund cl India Law Library Docid # 1855143
(59) CHUNNI LAL SON OF SHRI RIZUMAL Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 The present appeal under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the judgment and order dated 29.08.1990, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Barmer in Sessions Case No.51/1989, whereby the appellant was convicted under sections 8 and 18 of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act) and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years with a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default of payment of India Law Library Docid # 1856368
(60) SRI GANGA CHARAN ARYAWARDHAN HOSPITAL Vs. STATE OF U P AND OTHERS [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 02-12-2022 In the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge an order dated 17.10.2022 passed by the Vice-Chairman of Bareilly Development Authority1 rejecting the proposal for compounding of the nursing home of the petitioner. Further under challenge are the orders/letters both dated 22.10.2022 informing the petitioner, respectively, that as per the approved layout, on a residential plot, a nursing home cannot be sanctioned, therefore, the proposal for compounding of the nursing home has bee India Law Library Docid # 1848002