India Law Library

User not Logged..

Law Books shopping cart Launched! - Big Offers & Huge Discounts - All Law Books at One Place — Limited Time Deals!!

Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer

Latest Cases

First
«
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
»
Last

(321) XYZ Vs. STATE OF H.P.[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 — Section 102, Section 12, Section 3 — Bail for Child in Conflict with Law (CCL) — Mandatory nature of bail requirement — Denial of bail under Section 12(1) proviso requires objective 'reasonable grounds' — Bail to a CCL, even in case of heinous offence (Sections 302, 201, 120B, 34 of IPC), is the rule, irrespective of the nature or gravity of the offence, unless exceptional circumstances defined in the proviso exist — Exceptional circ
India Law Library Docid # 2438003

(322) PAWAN KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 — Rule 10(6) and 10(7) — Suspension — Review Period — Mandatory nature of 90-day review — An order of suspension must be reviewed by the competent authority before the expiry of 90 days from the effective date of suspension — Subsequent extension of suspension must also be done before the expiry of the extended period— If review and extension are not carried out within 90 days, the suspension order ceases to be valid as per
India Law Library Docid # 2438004

(323) KHEM RAJ (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Sections 4, 18, 23 — Determination of Market Value — Acid Test — Market value is the price a willing vendor might reasonably expect from a willing purchaser, prevailing on the date of the Section 4 notification — Factors under Section 23, including existing advantages and potential possibilities, must be considered, disregarding the vendor's disinclination or the purchaser's necessity
India Law Library Docid # 2438019

(324) DINU @ DINESH Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Criminal Revision — Sections 279 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) — Conviction affirmed but sentence modified — Release on Probation — Convict sentenced to simple imprisonment for four months each for offences under Section 279 IPC (rash driving) and 337 IPC (causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others) — Convict not pressing challenge to conviction but seeking release on probation
India Law Library Docid # 2438020

(325) SOUMYA GOPAL Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS[KERALA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 413 — Appeal by victim — A victim has the right to appeal against an order of acquittal, a conviction for a lesser offense, or inadequate compensation, and such appeal lies to the court where an appeal would ordinarily be filed against the conviction order of the trial court.
India Law Library Docid # 2438262

(326) MR. V. NARAYANA REDDY Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA[KERALA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of proceedings — Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonor of cheque — Competency of complainant's representative — Whether Assistant Manager (Law) is competent to file complaint — Disputed question of fact to be decided by trial court.
India Law Library Docid # 2438264

(327) APSRTC, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF CIVIL ENGINEER-II MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER Vs. R. VENKAT REDDY[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Arbitration Act, 1940 — Section 20 — Reference to arbitration — Powers of the "Court" — Under the 1940 Act, the Court does not become functus officio after appointing an arbitrator, and retains control over the arbitral proceedings until a judgment and decree are passed — The Court can entertain subsequent applications arising out of the reference.
India Law Library Docid # 2438265

(328) ABUZAR AHMED AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 498A, 504 — Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Sections 3, 4 — Quashing of FIR — Allegations primarily relate to marital discord and perceived household issues, not the grave cruelty or unlawful demands required by law — Vague and omnibus allegations without specific instances or evidence do not meet statutory thresholds — Tendency to misuse Section 498A IPC in
India Law Library Docid # 2438333

(329) MUKESH GAUR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 528 — Quashing of Bank Account Freeze — Inherent Jurisdiction — Application for quashing of bank account debit freeze order and de-freezing of accounts — Maintainable invoking inherent jurisdiction of High Court — Continuous debit freeze after investigation and charge-sheet submission, without a subsisting judicial order, is arbitrary, illegal and without authority
India Law Library Docid # 2438343

(330) KOMMIREDDINAGU @ GANESH, HINDU Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 106 — Burden of proving fact to be proved to make evidence admissible — When prosecution establishes incriminatory circumstances, accused has a duty to explain them.
India Law Library Docid # 2438436

(331) GADDE VENKATA SUSEELA AND OTHERS Vs. GADDE SEETHAMAHA LAKSHMI AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order VI Rule 17 — Amendment of pleadings — Amendments should be allowed if necessary for determining the real question in controversy, provided they do not cause injustice or prejudice to the other side — Amendments should be disallowed if they seek to withdraw clear admissions, raise time-barred claims, fundamentally change the nature of the suit, are malafide, or
India Law Library Docid # 2438437

(332) GUNDLA GOVINDA RAJULU AND OTHERS Vs. PEDDISETTY SRINIVASA KUMAR AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 6 Rule 17 — Amendment of Pleadings — Generally allowed to determine real questions in controversy and avoid multiplicity of proceedings, pro6ded it does not cause injustice or prejudice — However, amendments are to be disallowed if they withdraw admissions, raise time-barred claims, substantially change the nature of the suit, are mala fide, or cause loss
India Law Library Docid # 2438438

(333) THE APSRTC Vs. MEDA BHANU MANOJ AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 168, 169 — Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal — Summary procedure — A.P. Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, Rule 476(7) — FIR, Post-mortem report, etc., can be basis for claim, but not exhaustive — Tribunal can consider other oral or documentary evidence — "Shall" in Rule 476(7) is directory, not mandatory.
India Law Library Docid # 2438439

(334) KELLER GROUND ENGINEERING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ of Mandamus — Withholding payment for completed work — Petitioner, a subcontractor, completed works at Polavaram Irrigation Project. State sanctioned imprest amount for direct payment to subcontractors due to main contractor's financial distress. Petitioner received direct instructions from respondent authorities and had work progress acknowledged in
India Law Library Docid # 2438440

(335) S.B.G. SARMA Vs. BANK OF BARODA MUMBAI AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Banking service regulations — Disciplinary proceedings against retired employee — Charge memo issued after retirement — Held to be without jurisdiction — No disciplinary action can be initiated after an employee retires, unless specifically provided by rules.
India Law Library Docid # 2438441

(336) SMT SARBANI MAZUMDAR @ SARKAR ALIAS SARBANI SARKAR MAZUMDAR Vs. SRI PRABHAT MAJUMDAR ALIAS PRAVAT MAZUMDAR[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 13(1)(ib) — Desertion — Wife admitted living separately since 2007 — No evidence of cruelty by husband or justification for separation — Wife failed to prove any animus revertendi or intention to return to conjugal life — Husband's previous divorce suits withdrawn to sustain marriage — Wife's allegations of cruelty and ulterior motive by husband disproved — Wife found
India Law Library Docid # 2438782

(337) DR. SOMA MANDAL DEBNATH Vs. SRI TANMOY DEBNATH[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Special Marriage Act, 1954 — Section 27(1)(d) — Cruelty — Irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a component of cruelty — Supreme Court decision in Rakesh Raman v. Kavita (2023) 17 SCC 433 establishes that an irretrievably broken-down marriage constitutes cruelty, even if not a standalone ground for divorce under the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
India Law Library Docid # 2438783

(338) FULMONI BARIK AND OTHERS Vs. SISIR KUMAR MONDAL AND OTHERS[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Second Appeal — Interference by High Court — High Court should be slow to interfere with judgments decided on facts in a second appeal, but not when the Trial Court fails to appreciate evidence properly and apply the correct principal of law.
India Law Library Docid # 2438784

(339) SRI ZONUNFELA RAWIHTE AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND OTHERS[TRIPURA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 14 and 16 — Equality before Law and Equality of Opportunity in Public Employment — Fixed Pay Policy — Arbitrary and Discriminatory — Held, a policy of fixed pay for employees appointed to regular posts after a selection process is arbitrary, irrational, and unreasonable, violating
India Law Library Docid # 2438833

(340) PINKI SAHA ROY AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF TRIPURA[TRIPURA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 439 — Bail — Applicant sought bail for husband accused of murder and conspiracy — Husband in custody for over 496 days — Prima facie materials indicated husband's involvement as mastermind, coordinating crime, extorting money, and attempting to destroy evidence
India Law Library Docid # 2438834

First
«
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
»
Last