ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(201) AJAY KUMAR GUPTA Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND ANOTHER [DELHI HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023
To issue a writ of mandamus order direction thereby directing the respondent to release the goods i.e. Hublot Big Bang watch marking 142651 and Bvlgari Serpenti watch for the purpose of re-export of same in terms of order in appeal no. CC (A) CUS /D-I/Airport/ 300-302/2022-2023 dated 28.6.2022 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), New Customs House, New Delhi.
India Law Library Docid # 1873773

(202) MANOHAR LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN, THROUGH PP AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 01-05-2023
The revisional court while setting aside the said order, directed the trial court to take cognizance against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 341 and 323 of the IPC and to initiate the trial. This order has been challenged by the petitioner-accused in the instant criminal petition.
India Law Library Docid # 1873257

(203) BANWARI LAL GURJAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN, THROUGH P.P. AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 01-05-2023
Present appeal is preferred under Section 14A(1) of SC/ST (POA) Act aggrieved from order dated 11.05.2022 passed by learned Special Judge (SC/ST (POA) Act Cases), Sawaimadhopur whereby learned trial Court had proceeded to take cognizance against the appellants under Sections 379 and 447 IPC and Sections 3(1)(f), 3(1)(g) and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (POA) Act.
India Law Library Docid # 1873423

(204) THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. SMT. SAMYA AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 01-05-2023
This appeal arises out of judgment dated 16.07.2001 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gulabpura, Camp at Shahpura, District Bhilwara (for short "the tribunal") in Civil Misc. Case No. 123/2000 (C.M.38) by which the tribunal has held only the insurance company liable to make the payment of the compensation amount to the claimants. Being aggrieved by the judgment of the tribunal, the appellant insurance company has preferred the instant appeal.
India Law Library Docid # 1873513

(205) HOUZZ INC Vs. MAHENDRA SINGH RATHORE AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 01-05-2023
By way of instant revision petition, filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, challenge has been made to an order dated 03.06.2019 passed by the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge No.15, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur, dismissing the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed by petitioner.
India Law Library Docid # 1873533

(206) SUBHASH Vs. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 01-05-2023

India Law Library Docid # 1873541

(207) ALEMLA JAMIR Vs. NIA [DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-05-2023
The appeal under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 read with Section 167(2) and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) has been filed by appellant/Alemla Jamir, who is facing trial in case R.C. No. 26/2019 under Section 10,13,17,18, 20 and 21 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UA(P) Act), registered at Police Station NIA (National Investigation Agency), Delhi.
India Law Library Docid # 1873771

(208) ASHUTOSH RAZDAN Vs. NETCOM SOFTECH PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS [DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-05-2023
Petitioner challenges the order dated 03.03.2021 whereby the learned Trial Court after considering the material on record of the suit, concluded that the dispute arising in the said suit is not a commercial dispute within the meaning of Section 2(1) (c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter as "Act") and simultaneously placed the matter before the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge (South-West), Dwarka Courts, for appropriate orders on the same.
India Law Library Docid # 1873780

(209) JIA LAL VERMA AND OTHERS Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 31-04-2023
Ranbir Penal Code, 1989 - Sections 120-B, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477A - Jammu and Kashmir Prevention of Corruption Act, 2006 - Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(d) - Preparation of fake bills, forged receipts by Central Government Employees causing huge loss to the State exchequer - Whether CBI could have continued with the investigation and filed the charge sheet against the petitioners or not, when once the complicity of the Central Government employees in the commission of alleged offe
India Law Library Docid # 1603295

(210) NAVEEN KUMAR DALAL Vs. NEELAM KADYAN [DELHI HIGH COURT] 28-04-2023
In the present petition, the Petitioner - Naveen Kumar Dalal (hereinafter, "husband") has challenged the impugned order dated 29th March, 2023 passed by the ld. Judge, Family Court, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter, "Family Court") by which the right of the husband to cross examine the Respondent - Smt. Neelam Kadyan (hereinafter, "wife") has been closed. The husband's evidence has also been closed and the matter has been fixed for final arguments for tomorrow i.e. on 29th April, 202
India Law Library Docid # 1869479

(211) NARAYAN MANDAL Vs. SANJIB ROY [GAUHATI HIGH COURT] 28-04-2023
The facts relevant for adjudication of this Civil Revision Petition, in brief, are as follows: The Respondent No.1, Sri Sanjib Roy, as Plaintiff, had instituted a Title Suit against the present Revisionist and 12 others for declaration of right, title and interest over the suit land and fishery measuring about 4 bighas which falls in Govt Dag No. 32 situated at village No. 2 Dungabori Kissam under Mouza-Gova in the district of Morigaon Assam. The said suit has been registered as Title Suit No. 3
India Law Library Docid # 1870104

(212) BUDDHESHWAR Vs. MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DESTRIBUTION COMPANY [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 28-04-2023
Condition 12 of the appointment order dtd. 6/10/2018 stipulates that the character and antecedents verification form included with the appointment order shall be filled in by the employee while reporting on duty and that if the verification reveals adverse character or antecedent, the employee shall be terminated. Column 11 of the attestation form reads thus : 11.(a) Have you ever been arrested/prosecuted/kept under detention, or bound down/fined/convicted by a court of law for any offence or de
India Law Library Docid # 1870123

(213) SURAJ Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 28-04-2023
The petitioner through his father is questioning the legality or otherwise of the impugned order dtd. 20/10/2022 passed by respondent No.2 / District Magistrate, Amravati under Sec. 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers and Persons Engaged in Black Marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981 (MPDA Act), along with order passed by respondent No.1 dtd. 24/11/2022 confirming the detenti
India Law Library Docid # 1870218

(214) PRAKASH G. PATEL Vs. LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 28-04-2023
This Petition was initially filed for challenging the illegal action of partial demolition and damage caused to hotel premises, viz. M/s. Hotel Grand Heritage at the hands of Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. The Petitioners had prayed for directing Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to forthwith restore and repair the demolished part of the building. In the alternative, the Petitioners had prayed for allowing the Petitioners to restore and repair the building as it existed prior to illegal partial demolition and rec
India Law Library Docid # 1870219

(215) HARIKISAN VITHALDASJI CHANDAK Vs. SYED MAZARUDDIN SYED SHABUDDIN [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 28-04-2023
In this criminal application, filed under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenge is to the order dtd. 20/4/2013 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Darwha, whereby learned Magistrate allowed the application (Exh.65) in Cri. Complaint Case No. 517 of 2008, made by the complainants seeking amendment to the complaint filed under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the N.I. Act for short).
India Law Library Docid # 1870223

(216) KUTTUB K.Z. AND OTHERS Vs. A. SELVARAJ AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 28-04-2023
The plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.825 of 2007 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore, is the appellant in A.S.No.266 of 2013 and the defendants 1 to 3 in the same suit in O.S.No.825 of 2007 are the appellants in A.S.No.9 of 2014. Since both the appeals arise out of the common judgment and decree of learned IV Additional District Judge, Coimbatore, in the suit in O.S.No.825 of 2007, these two appeals are disposed of by this common judgment.
India Law Library Docid # 1871295

(217) D. HARISH AND OTHERS Vs. CHAMPALATHA AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 28-04-2023
The dispute is a duel between the petitioners and the respondents over succession to the estate of certain Chakrapani. Neither side are his direct legal descendants, as Chakrapani and his wife Mythili died issueless. And, what is the source or basis of their claim? While the revision petitioners, who are nephews of Chakrapani (they being the children of his brother Dayalan) stake a claim to his estate based on his alleged Will dated 24.08.1979, their opponents, who are the children of Chakrapani
India Law Library Docid # 1871315

(218) THE COIMBATORE CRICKET CLUB TRUST Vs. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 28-04-2023
The present Writ Petition has been filed claiming benefits under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Re-habitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 [hereinafter referred to as "New Act"]. Heard Mr.R.N.Amarnath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.Sathish, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1, 3 & 4 as well as Mr.A.M.Ravindranath Jeyapal, learned counsel for the third respondent.
India Law Library Docid # 1871331

(219) SHRI. A. SHAFIQ AHMED Vs. THE STATE [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 28-04-2023
The petitioner herein, who has been arrayed as A25 in C.C.No.16 of 2022 pending on the fie of IX Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai, has filed the present petition seeking to set aside one of the conditions imposed on him by the IX Additional Special Judge for CBI Case, Chennai while granting him bail by order dated 7.3.2023 in Crl.M.P.No.1306 of 2023.
India Law Library Docid # 1872074

(220) ROYAL YANAM RECREATION SOCIETY Vs. THE COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 28-04-2023
The writ petitioner seeks for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in its proceedings in No.3077 / B2 / YM / 2022 / 3, dated 15.04.2022, of the 2nd respondent in his order in No.14869 / SDMY / D3 / Gamble / 2021-2022, dated 15.04.2022 and of the 4th respondent by his order in No. 469 / SPY / DR / 2022, dated 16.04.2022, quash the same and consequently directing the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner Societys functioning in any
India Law Library Docid # 1872113