ive

Latest Cases

(21) JAGMOHAN PUNIA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 27-11-2020
All the cases were taken up for hearing through video conferencing.Vide this common order, CRM-M No.15574 of 2020 (O&M), CRM-M Nos.21640 of 2019 (O&M) and CRM-M No.3242 of 2019 (O&M) are being decided.In CRM-M Nos.15574 of 2020 and CRM-M No.21640 of 2019 petitioners have prayed for grant of regular bail, whereas in CRM-M No.3242 of 2019 prayer for grant of anticipatory bail has been made by the petitioner. Since all the three petitions have arisen out of one FIR, therefore, for brevity common fa

(22) DIMPLE KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 27-11-2020
The case was taken up for hearing through video conferencing.Petitioner seeks grant of regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No.13 dated 29.01.2019, registered under Section 22 of the NDPS Act at Police Station Lalru, District SAS Nagar (Mohali).As per prosecution, petitioner was apprehended with a black bag, when he stepped out from an Auto. On seeing the police party, he started running. Petitioner was apprehended on suspicion. Search of the bag resulted in recovery of SPAS

(23) ARSHAD Vs. STATE OF HARYANA [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 27-11-2020
The case was taken up for hearing through video conferencing.Petitioner seeks grant of regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No.396 dated 14.05.2019, registered under Sections 148/149/323/364/285/452 IPC and Sections 25- 54-59 of the Arms Act (Section 302 IPC added later on) at Police Station Nuh, District Mewat.The FIR was registered on the statement of Saikul with the allegations that in the night of occurrence at about 12/12.30 A.M., the complainant and others head cries o

(24) SAIKUL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 27-11-2020
The case was taken up for hearing through video conferencing.Petitioner seeks grant of regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No.397 dated 14.05.2019, registered under Sections 148, 149, 302, 307, 365 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act (Sections 54 and 59 of the Arms Act added later on) at Police Station Nuh, District Nuh, Haryana.The present FIR was registered in respect of murder of Sapat. Present case has some connectivity with FIR No.396 dated 14.05.2019, under Sections 14

(25) M/S PARADOR DEVELOPERS (AMRITSAR) PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, PUNJAB AND ANOTHER [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 27-11-2020
Vide request dated 13.10.2017, the appellant sought permission for change of land use of an area measuring 93.265 acres for development of a residential colony. The Department of Town and Country Planning, Punjab, granted permission for change of land use vide its memo dated 17.10.2017. Consequently, an application for grant of licence was made to the Amritsar Development Authority, who, granted the licence vide its memo dated 13.06.2019. Licence period was 5 years ending on 12.06.2024. Thus, ap

(26) RB HEALTH (US) LLC AND ANR Vs. DABUR INDIA LTD [DELHI HIGH COURT] 27-11-2020
I.A. No. 6865/2020 Preface: - The plaintiffs before me are seeking an injunction against the defendant from manufacturing, importing, marketing, advertising, promoting, selling and/or using plaintiff no. 1/RB Health (US) LLC's registered design i.e. design no. 271671, falling in class 28-02, in relation to a soap bar [hereafter referred to as the "subject design registration"]. There is the usual extrapolation of this prayer, which is, that an injunction is sought against the defendant in making

(27) MAHENDRASINH NATWARSINH PADHIYAR Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & OTHERS [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 27-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction to release the muddamal vehicle- XYLO D2 BS 4 7STR Car, Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd bearing RTO registration No. GJ-05-CP-1855 in connection with the FIR being CR No. 11197025200183 of 2020 registered with Karjan Police Station, District - Vadodara (Rural) for the offence punishable under Sections 65(A)(E), 81, 83 and

(28) MOHANLAL DHULCHAND KALAL Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 27-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction to release the muddamal vehicle- Maruti Swift Dzire ZDI bearing RTO registration No. RJ-27-CE-2858 in connection with the FIR being III- CR No. 274 of 2016 registered with Bakor Police Station, District - Mahisagar for the offence punishable under Sections 66(1), 65(A)(E), 116-B and 81 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act.

(29) AKABAR ISMAIL MATHDA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 27-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction so also inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash and set aside the order dated 05.09.2020 passed by the 2nd Additional Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gandhidham, Dist- Kachchh and to release the muddamal vehicle- Hero Splendor Motor Bike bearing RTO registration No.

(30) BODDU RAMESH Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI] 27-11-2020
These petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "Cr.P.C."), are filed seeking return of the property that was seized by the respective police at the time of registering the respective crimes against the petitioners.Heard learned counsel for petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.The record reveals that a case in Crime No.60 of 2019 of Duvvada Police Station, Visakhapatnam District, for the offences punishable under Sections 188, 272, 273, 32

(31) TADIVALASA SATISH Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI] 27-11-2020
This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "Cr.P.C.") is filed seeking quash of the F.I.R. in Crime No.153 of 2020 of Bathili Police Station, Srikakulam District.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.The petitioner is A-1 in Crime No.153 of 2020 of Bathili Police Station, Srikakulam District. A case in the above crime was registered against the petitioner under Sections 270 and 273 of the Indian Pena

(32) BOMMADEVARA SRI DURGA PADMAJA Vs. BOMMADEVARA RAMA CHANDRA RAO [ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI] 27-11-2020
When The matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by Sri Yellabandi Ramatirtha, learned counsel for the appellant, that, after filing the present appeal, parties have filed an application vide G.L.No.3207 of 2020 on 08.10.2020 seeking divorce by mutual consent before the learned Judge, Family Court, Vijayawada and the present appeal can be closed as withdrawn.Recording the above submission, this Family Court Appeal is closed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.As a sequel th

(33) VISHWANATH GUPTA Vs. STATE OF U P [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 26-11-2020
The above two criminal appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order dated 22.2.2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Kushi Nagar Padrauna in S.T. No. 168 of 2001 under section 498-A, 304-B, 302, 201 I.P.C. convicting and sentencing the appellants under section 498-A I.P.C. for two years imprisonment, under section 304-B I.P.C., for ten years imprisonment, under section 302 I.P.C. for life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine further imprisonme

(34) VIKRAM SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER [DELHI HIGH COURT] 26-11-2020
Crl. M.A. 16353/2020 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.2313/2020 Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No.344/2016 dated 06.08.2016 registered at Police Station Kalyan Puri and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.Notice issued.Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 present in person with her counsel and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final dis

(35) SABHAJEET MAURYA Vs. STATE NCT OF DELHI [DELHI HIGH COURT] 26-11-2020
Introduction The appellant impugns a judgment dated 27.08.2012 delivered by the learned ASJ-02, North West Rohini Courts, Delhi (hereinafter 'The Trial Court'), whereby the appellant was convicted under Sections 376/313/307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter 'IPC'). The appellant also impugns an order on sentence dated 14.09.2012, whereby the appellant was sentenced to undergo (i) rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years with a fine of Rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine,

(36) JASKARAN SINGH ARORA Vs. STATE, NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER [DELHI HIGH COURT] 26-11-2020
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing. Crl. M.A. 15794/2020 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL. M.C. 2218/2020 & CRL. M.A. 15795/2020 (Stay) Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No. 459/2020 dated 08.10.2020, for the offence punishable under Sections 376 IPC registered at Police Station - Rani Bagh, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom. Notice issued.Notice is accepted

(37) ZAS TELE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD AND ANOTHER Vs. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUNDS COMMISSIONER [DELHI HIGH COURT] 26-11-2020
This judgment has been pronounced through video conferencing.In the present petition, the relief prayed for by the Petitioners is that the review application before the Assistant Provident Funds Commissioner (hereinafter 'APFC') under Section 7B of the Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter, 'EPF Act') ought to be decided as the same has not been decided till date.The submission of ld. counsel for the Petitioners is that the APFC had determined the liability o

(38) M/S VENUS RECRUITERS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [DELHI HIGH COURT] 26-11-2020
This judgment has been pronounced through video conferencing.The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking issuance of a writ declaring the proceedings pending before the National Company Law Tribunal (Principal Bench) New Delhi (hereinafter, 'NCLT') in C.A.No.284(PB)/2018 in C.P.No. IB(201)PB/2017 as void and non-est.The question that has arisen is whether under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter, 'IBC'), an application filed under Section 43 for avoidanc

(39) BELLEZZA APARTMENTS OWNERS AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS [TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 26-11-2020
This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the complaint in Crime No.601 of 2020 pending on the file of KPHB Colony Police Station, Cyberabad district. The petitioners are accused in the said crime. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 406, 418 and 420 of IPC.Heard Sri B.Adi Narayana Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Srinivasa Rao Bodduluri, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Pattabhi Vemulapati, learned counsel representing Sri Rambabu

(40) HIRENBHAI SABBIRBHAI VASAVA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 26-11-2020
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to invoke extra ordinary jurisdiction to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, mainly supervisory jurisdiction to release the muddamal vehicle- Maruti Eco Car bearing RTO registration No. GJ-16-CN-7582 in connection with the FIR being CR No. 11199050200331 of 2020 registered with Valiya Police Station, District - Bharuch for the offence punishable under Sections 65(A)(E), 81 and 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act.Heard lear