ive
India Law Library (Website) is free for India Law Library Offline customers only, Please Don't Pay for this website.

User not Logged..
IP Address :44.201.96.43
Latest Cases

(21) SANGEETA Vs. KALPANA SOOD [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 01-04-2022
Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the defendant), by way of instant petition, has assailed order dated 25.11.2020, passed by learned Additional District Judge-III, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3-D/XIV2020, whereby order dated 23.11.2019 passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Palampur, Distt. Kangra in CMA No. 598 of 2019 has been set aside and an order directing the parties to maintain status quo qua the nature and possession of

(22) KALPANA SOOD Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 01-04-2022
By way of instant petition, exception has been taken to the proceedings u/s 145 Cr.P.C., initiated by learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. and the order dated 26.06.2020 passed therein. The impugned order reads as under:-

(23) GURNAM SINGH Vs. SACRED HEART SEN. SEC. SCHOOL [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 01-04-2022
This is an application filed under Section 11 read with Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short), praying for appointment of an independent Arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the petitioner and the respondents.

(24) ASHISH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 31-03-2022
By way of instant petition filed under Section 482 Cr.PC, prayer has been made by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 215 of 2019, dated 18.7.2019, registered at PS Nalagarh, under Section 306 read with Section 34 of IPC, as well as consequent proceedings, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P.

(25) SANDEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 30-03-2022
The appellants by way of instant appeals have assailed judgment and sentence dated 20.12.2016 passed by learned Additional Sessions (Special) Judge, Kullu in Sessions trial No. 32 of 2015, , whereby, appellants have been convicted for commission of offences punishable under Sections 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (for short "the Act") and each of them has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay fine of Rs. one lakh and in default o

(26) LAL CHAND Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 30-03-2022
Appellant, is in appeal against the judgment dated 09.10.2017, passed by learned Special Judge-II, Kullu, H.P. in Sessions Trial No. 18/2016, whereby the appellant has been convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'ND&PS' Act) and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further simple imprisonment fo

(27) CHAIRMAN, ARMY PUBLIC SCHOOL AND OTHERS Vs. URMILA CHAUHAN AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 30-03-2022
Learned Single Judge vide judgment dated 04.05.2021, directed the Army Public School, Dagshai, District Solan, H.P., to regularize the services of the writ petitioner as Trained Graduate Teacher (Music) [in short 'TGT (Music)'] after completion of five years of service on contract basis by taking her appointment on contract basis w.e.f. 19.09.2011, with all consequential benefits.

(28) BHUSHAN LAL SHARMA Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 29-03-2022
Two separate writ petitions bearing CWP(T) Nos. 6340 & 11665 of 2008 were filed by S/Sh. Bhushan Lal Sharma & Ajay Sharma respectively, questioning the selection/appointment of S/Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Rakesh Rana and Sumit Sood as Assistant Engineers (Civil) [hereinafter referred as AE(C)] in the respondent Irrigation & Public Health Department. These writ petitions were partly allowed by the learned Single Judge on 03.10.2012. It was noticed in the judgment that Sh. Rajesh Kumar had not joined the

(29) OM PRABHA NEGI Vs. H.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 29-03-2022
Petitioner, serving as Section Officer in office of respondent No.1 H.P. Public Service Commission (hereinafter to be referred as Commission), has filed the instant petition for quashing Office Memorandum dated 24.9.2019 whereby Tentative Seniority List of Section Officers, as it stood on 1.9.2019, depicting private respondents No. 5 to 7 senior to petitioner has been circulated, and also for quashing of proceedings of Department Promotion Committee (DPC) dated 1.1.2010 (Annexure P-6), 16.11.201

(30) RAJESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 29-03-2022
Instant appeal has been preferred by convict Rajesh Kumar (hereinafter referred to as the appellant) against judgment/order dated 26.06.2019/29.06.2019, passed by learned Special Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala, H.P., in Sessions Case R.B.T. No.20-P/VII/19/14, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Rajesh Kumar, in case FIR No. 248 of 2013, dated 13.12.2013, registered in Police Station Palampur, District Kangra, H.P., under Sections 354-A, 506, 509 of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC') and Se

(31) KALLU DEVI Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 28-03-2022
Bail petitioner namely Kallu Devi, who is behind bars since 29.9.2021, has approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Section 439 of Cr.PC, for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 82, dated 10.8.2021, registered at Police Station Banjar, District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh under Sections 20, 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter, 'Act'). Respondent-State has filed the status report in terms of order dated 14.3.2022. ASI Shesh Raj, PS. Banja

(32) JASPREET Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-03-2022
The present bail application has been maintained by the petitioner under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking his release in case FIR No. 242 of 2021, dated 31.10.2021, under Sections 363, 376 of IPC & Section 4 of POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Sadar, District Shimla, H.P.

(33) RAJ KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 24-03-2022
The present petition is maintained by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as "the Code") for quashing of F.I.R No.40 of 2018 dated 16.5.2018, under Sections 354-A, 354-D and 509 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Sujanpur, District Hamirpur, H.P. alongwith all consequential proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R., pending before the learned trial Court.

(34) NISHANT MENON Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 24-03-2022
The present petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as "the Code"), has been maintained by the petitioner for quashing of F.I.R No. 0493, dated 15.10.2018, under Sections 341 and 143 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter to be called as "IPC"), registered in Police Station Una Sadar, District Una, H.P.

(35) SUSHIL KUMAR SHARMA Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 24-03-2022
The petitioner seeks direction to the respondents (i) to treat him as notionally appointed Junior Basic Teacher (in short 'JBT') on contract basis in District Kinnaur, H.P. at par with the other candidates, who were appointed in District Kinnaur in February/March 2014 on the basis of counselling held on 14.02.2014 and (ii) consequently to consider him for regularization at par with other candidates so appointed on contract basis and regularized vide order dated 26.05.20117.

(36) CHANDER PRAKASH Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 24-03-2022
By way of instant appeal, appellant has assailed his conviction and sentence recorded by the learned Special Judge-II, Kinnaur at Rampur Bushahr, H.P., vide judgment dated 06.06.2016 in Sessions Trial No. 28-R/3 of 2016, whereby the appellant has been convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985( for short 'ND& PS' Act) and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,0

(37) RAVI SHARMA Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 23-03-2022
The case of the petitioner is that his father Shri Hans Raj, who was serving as a Constable in the Police Department, died in harness on 20.01.1993. At the relevant time, the petitioner was a minor and his elder sister Ms. Mangla Devi is otherwise suffering from disability to the extent of 90% and therefore, she was not in a position to apply for compassionate appointment. After the petitioner attained the age of majority he applied for compassionate appointment on account of death of his father

(38) SUDHA DEVI Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 23-03-2022
Petitioner claims that despite having been appointed as a part time employee, she continued to discharge the duties of a whole time worker for many years. She accordingly filed a petition praying for regularization of her services either as Class-III or Class- IV employee and equivalent wages for the duties discharged by her for the period on the analogy of equal pay for equal work. Learned erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal ('Tribunal' for short) did not find favour in her claim

(39) POOJA COTSPIN LIMITED Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-03-2022
Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a registered dealer under the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005, (in short 'VAT Act'). The Assessing Authority, Baddi, District Solan, H.P. assessed the petitioner for the year 2010-11 under the VAT Act and also the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The assessment order was issued on 29.09.2011. A total sum of Rs. 1,31,43,515/- was assessed as excess Input Tax Credit (for short 'ITC'), out of which a sum of Rs. 49,27,694/- was applied toward

(40) STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS Vs. SURI DASS NEGI AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-03-2022
The facts of the case are that the respondents Suri Dass Negi and Ajit Kumar Bhardwaj alongwith twelve others were recommended/selected for the appointment of Block Development Officers through Himachal Pradesh Administrative Services by the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission on 01.09.1997. The pay scale of all fourteen Block Development Officers was fixed on the revised pay scale of Rs. 7800-11660/- from the date of their joining vide order dated 06.05.1998 passed by Director-cum-Addl.

IP Address :44.201.96.43