(21) SMT MAMTA SHARMA Vs. S S G PAREEK WOMEN UNIVERSITY AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 09-12-2022 This Civil Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 08.09.2015 passed by learned Sessions Judge No.20, Headquarter Chomu, Jaipur Metropolitan whereby Civil Misc. Appeal Nos.14/2013, 15/2013 were allowed & Civil Misc. Appeal No.28/2013 was dismissed and against the order dated 10.10.2013 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Division) & Metropolitan Magistrate No.25, Jaipur Metropolitan in application for tempor India Law Library Docid # 1856473
(22) SHRICHAND Vs. AHAMED ISMAYIL [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 08-12-2022 The issue involved in the present petition is somewhat unique. Whether defendant in a suit for eviction filed under the provisions of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, who compromises it before National Lok Adalat by inviting a decree can subsequently question executability of that decree? India Law Library Docid # 1855220
(23) CHIRAYIL SUGATHAN Vs. ASEES [KERALA HIGH COURT] 08-12-2022 Can a person claiming as a co-owner obstruct the delivery of a building, pursuant to an order of eviction obtained by another co-owner, is the question to be decided in this original petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution.
(24) VINOD BINDAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 08-12-2022 The petitioner in the aforesaid anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. is alleged to have committed offences punishable under Section 3 (1) (r) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as SC/ST Act) and Section 384 of the IPC in case FIR No.948 dated 19.10.2022 registered at Police Station Assandh, District Karnal. India Law Library Docid # 1856284
(25) SUNDAR RAJAN Vs. JASBIR KAUR AND ANOTHER [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 08-12-2022 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 read with Section 444 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short the Cr.P.C.) for quashing of impugned order dated 25.07.2022 (Annexure P-12) passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ludhiana, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 444 of the Cr.P.C. for discharging him as a surety of accused/respondent No.2 in Criminal Complaint No.COMA/4800+ 4801 of 2014 titled as Jasbir Kaur Vs. Mrs. Kalai India Law Library Docid # 1856285
(26) RUPINDER KAUR AND OTHERS Vs. M/S RAJSHREE STEEL PVT. LTD. CO. AND OTHERS [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 08-12-2022 The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 31.05.2018 whereby on an application filed by the defendant-petitioner Nos.4 to 6 for deexhibiting the documents (Ex.P43 and Ex.P44), the Trial Court has passed an order holding that the objections regarding the admissibility would be decided at the final stage of the suit after leading of evidence by both the parties. India Law Library Docid # 1856286
(27) KUNTESH SHARMA Vs. MANISHA SHARMA [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 08-12-2022 The present misc. appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 is directed against the order dated 01.03.2017 passed by the Family Court No.1, Bikaner (hereinafter referred to as Family Court) whereby the application preferred by appellanthusband under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC praying to set aside ex parte decree dated 06.05.2016 was rejected. India Law Library Docid # 1856374
(28) DINANATH SUPDU JOSHI Vs. SHRIRAM [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 07-12-2022 By this petition, petitioner challenges order dtd. 12/8/2022 passed by the 02nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Nandurbar allowing application of the defendant No. 1/ respondent No. 1 for appointment of Court Commissioner for measurement of plot Nos. 23 and 24 at Survey No. 284, Shanti Nagar, Nandurbar. Application was moved by the defendant No. 1 in the suit filed by the plaintiff/petitioner. India Law Library Docid # 1855173
(29) MEENA BABU DARADE Vs. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 07-12-2022 By the present writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the rejection of the nomination of the petitioner for the election of the village panchayat of village Nafarwadi, Taluka - Patoda, District - Beed. The petitioner submitted her nomination form from Ward No.2 of village Nafarwadi from BCC(W) category. India Law Library Docid # 1855175
(30) PRADIP UTTAMRAO PATIL Vs. SAURABH PRAMOD MAHAJAN [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 07-12-2022 By this petition, petitioners challenge the order dtd. 10/3/2022 passed by the Joint Judge, Senior Division, Dhule rejecting application filed for setting aside 'no written statement' order, for condonation of delay in filing written statement and for taking on record their written statement. India Law Library Docid # 1855125
(31) MATHEW Vs. STATE OF KERALA [KERALA HIGH COURT] 07-12-2022 Can a 'customer' in a brothel be proceeded against criminally under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (for short, 'the Act')? The above question requires to be answered in this petition filed by the alleged customer, invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
(32) NEETHA LUKOSE Vs. STATE OF KERALA [KERALA HIGH COURT] 07-12-2022 The petitioner was appointed as an Upper Primary School Teacher in St.Joseph's Higher Secondary School, Thiruvananthapuram (the School), initially in a temporary vacancy for the period from 28/7/2010 to 31/12/2013. In the meanwhile, another temporary vacancy arose in the School on 1/10/2013 and the Manager of the School shifted the petitioner to that vacancy. The petitioner was accordingly working in the said vacancy till 13/1/2014. The said appointment was approved initially on daily wage basis India Law Library Docid # 1855497
(33) S.SELVARAJ SIMPSON Vs. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SINGARAVELAR MAALIGAI, 62, RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI COLLECTORATE, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU - 600001. AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 06-12-2022 Though the order challenged in the Writ Petitin is one transferring proceedings to the jurisdictional Revenue Divisional Officer. A perusal of the document executed by the petitioner reveals that the petitioner cannot seek relief under the special enactment namely, Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. Section 23 of the Act declares certain transfers as void. India Law Library Docid # 1854386
(34) SURESH MADHUKAR SHENDRE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 06-12-2022 By this appeal, the appellant challenges judgment and order dtd. 20/7/2017 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Sessions Case No. 111/2015 whereby he is convicted for offence punishable under sec. 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine Rs.50, 000.00 and in default of payment of the fine amount to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months. The appellant is also given set-off under Sec. 428 of the Indian Penal Code sin India Law Library Docid # 1855114
(35) SUO MOTU Vs. UNION OF INDIA [KERALA HIGH COURT] 06-12-2022 This DBP is registered suo motu based on the proceedings dtd. 18/11/2022 since news items appeared in visual media regarding the helicopter service package for Sabarimala pilgrims offered by the 11th respondent, a private agency in its website 'helikerala.com'. A copy of the printout taken from the website of the 11th respondent forms part of this DBP. Going by the materials on record, the 11th respondent will operate two daily trips from Kochi to Nilakkal, at the rate of Rs.45, 000.00 per head, India Law Library Docid # 1855510
(36) JASEELA T.M. Vs. STATE OF KERALA [KERALA HIGH COURT] 06-12-2022 The prayers in the aforecaptioned Writ Petition (Crl.), seeking for issuance of writs of Habeas Corpus and certiorari, in regard to the challenge against the order to preventively detain the detenu herein, in terms of Sec.3(i) Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007 [hereinafter referred as 'KAAPA' for short] are as follows : India Law Library Docid # 1855509
(37) SUNIL KRISHNAN K.G. Vs. K.G. PREMSANKAR [KERALA HIGH COURT] 06-12-2022 The plaintiff in O.S No.2/2014 of the Court of the First Additional District Judge, Thrissur (court below) has assailed Ext P8 order in the original petition. The respondent is the brother of the petitioner and defendant in the suit.
(38) HANEEFA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS [KERALA HIGH COURT] 06-12-2022 Petitioners are alleged to have conducted a parallel telephone exchange, and on getting information, Crime No.340 of 2005 of Ponnani Police Station was registered against them. After investigation, a final report was filed, which was taken cognizance as C.C. No.9 of 2012 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Ponnani. India Law Library Docid # 1848653
(39) PRAKASH Vs. VASUNDH [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 05-12-2022 The present civil revision application is filed being aggrieved by the order dtd. 23/06/2014 passed by learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur in Spl. Civil Suit No. 816/2011. India Law Library Docid # 1855155
(40) SUNEESH Vs. STATE OF KERALA [KERALA HIGH COURT] 05-12-2022 Annexure-A1 final report in C.C.No.1483/2019 on the file of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (E.O), Ernakulam, sought to be quashed in this petition filed under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C' for short). The petitioner herein is the accused in the above case. Respondents herein are the State of Kerala as well as the defacto complainant in the above case.