ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(181) MIRA BHAYANDER MAHANAGARPALIKA Vs. DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR, KONKAN [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 03-05-2023
This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails the legality, propriety and correctness of an order passed by the Minister (Cooperation) in Revision Application No.8 to 2020 thereby upholding the order dtd. 19/12/2019 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Society, Konkan Division, in Appeal No.49 of 2018 allowing the appeal preferred by respondent No.3 Society and ordering the deregistration of the petitioner Society purportedly under the provisions of Sec.
India Law Library Docid # 1870155

(182) ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY Vs. MIRYALA VENKATA SUBBAMMA [ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 03-05-2023
This revision-petition is directed against the Order, dtd. 27/3/2015 in I.A.No.551 of 2015 in M.V.O.P.No.245 of 2011 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Ongole, whereunder the Trial Court Dismissed the application filed by the revision-petitioner under Order XVI Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity CPC).
India Law Library Docid # 1870243

(183) SMT. KAMLA DEVI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 03-05-2023
The petitioners Smt. Kamla Devi and Devendra Singh have filed the present criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 11.04.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Women Atrocities Cases), Jaipur Metropolitan-II in Criminal Revision Petition No.146/2019 (CIS No.1601/2019), whereby, learned revisional court while partly allowing the revision petition discharged the accused petitioners from the charges framed against them for the offences under Sections 467
India Law Library Docid # 1873402

(184) STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS Vs. RAMSWAROOP SHARMA [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 03-05-2023
The aforesaid averment does not make any sense. It is further stated therein that thereafter, the file was sent by the District Superintendent of Police on 08.11.2017 to the Additional Director General of Police; but, the application is completely silent as to when and where the file travelled thereafter which resulted into inordinate delay of 275 days in preferring the appeal except rhetorically detailing the routine Government system in which the file travels.
India Law Library Docid # 1873485

(185) MAHERBAN HASAN BABU KHAN Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023
This Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 18.12.2019 in Special Atrocity Case No.11 of 2016, passed by learned Special Court at Mangaon, District Raigad. By the impugned judgment, the learned Judge has held the Appellant guilty of offences punishable under Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) and Sections 376(2)(i) and 376(2)(j) of the Indian Penal Code. He has been sentenced to undergo
India Law Library Docid # 1869259

(186) MOHANDAS P.D. Vs. DISTRICT GEOLOGIST OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST, MINI CIVIL STATION [KERALA HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023
For convenience, facts of the case in W.P.(C) No.34257 of 2022 are narrated here. Facts in other cases are almost identical. The petitioner is in ownership and possession of 0.297 Hectares of land situated in Peechi Village of Thrissur Taluk. The petitioner wanted to construct a residential building on the property. The Grama Panchayat, after verification, granted Ext.P3 Building Permit.
India Law Library Docid # 1870054

(187) RATHEESH DASAN Vs. STATE OF KERALA [KERALA HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023
The petitioner states that he joined service in the Last Grade Service as Attender Grade-II in the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Tirur which is in Malappuram District on 10/2/2017. The petitioner was promoted as Office Attendant Grade-I on 20/2/2018, as Court Keeper Grade-II on 14/9/2018 and as Court Keeper Grade-I on 16/3/2019. Later, the petitioner was promoted as Process Server on 16/3/2019. The petitioner is now working as such in Sub Court, Tirur in Malappuram District. The petitioner ha
India Law Library Docid # 1870055

(188) SUJITH SREERENGUM Vs. SUNIL SRADHEYAM [KERALA HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023
The writ petitioner and the 1st respondent were elected as Members of Ward No.7 and Ward No.11 respectively of the Mannar Grama Panchayat, in the General Elections to the Local Self Government Institutions held during December, 2020. According to the petitioner, both of them were official candidates of Indian National Congress (INC), a constituent of United Democratic Front (UDF). After the elections, the petitioner and the 3rd respondent filed Form-2 Declarations showing their allegiance to Ind
India Law Library Docid # 1870056

(189) MUHAMMED SHIRAZ Vs. STATE OF KERALA [KERALA HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023
The petitioner in this Writ Petition (Crl.), filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, essentially seeks to quash Ext.P1 FIR No.775/2021 of Aranmula Police Station, ExtP2 final report and all further proceedings in S.C.No.463 of 2021 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court-I (POCSO Special Court), Pathanamthitta. The petitioner is accused No.3 in the Sessions Case. He, along with the other accused, faces charges under Ss. 376, 376(2)(n), 450, 376(3), 366A r/w Sec. 34 of the Indi
India Law Library Docid # 1870057

(190) SHREEDEVI Vs. SELECTION COMMISSION, CHENNITHALA THRIPPERUMTHARA GRAMA [KERALA HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023
The petitioners are before this Court seeking to quash Ext.P17 select list and to direct the 4th respondent to appoint them in the vacancies of Anganwadi Workers in Anganwadi Centre Nos.81, 84, 96 and 155 of Chennithala Thriperumthura Grama Panchayat under the ICDS Mavelikkara Project.
India Law Library Docid # 1870058

(191) MAHERBAN HASAN BABU KHAN Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023
This Appeal is directed against the judgment dtd. 18/12/2019 in Special Atrocity Case No.11 of 2016, passed by learned Special Court at Mangaon, District Raigad. By the impugned judgment, the learned Judge has held the Appellant guilty of offences punishable under Ss. 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) and Ss. 376(2)(i) and 376(2)(j) of the Indian Penal Code. He has been sentenced to undergo (i) rigorous imprisonment for 7 years with fine of Rs.10,00
India Law Library Docid # 1870121

(192) RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED Vs. SENCON SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED [ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023
The applicant had entrusted a work relating to structural steel work for calcining and refractory material plant - CRMP - Zone 5 to the respondent on 31/3/2007. A formal agreement was executed on 21/6/2007. The work was to be completed by 23/9/2008. The work was not completed by that day and extensions were given from time to time. The applicant, by a notice dtd. 24/2/2010, terminated a part of the work. Subsequently, the entire contract was terminated on 23/8/2010 by the applicant.
India Law Library Docid # 1870279

(193) CHAMPA LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023
The instant Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397/401 of the Cr.P.C. against the impugned judgment dated 15.06.2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhinmal in Criminal Appeal No.13/2007 as well as against the judgment dated 22.01.2007 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhinmal in Criminal Regular Case No.333/2006 whereby the petitioner Champa Lal was convicted for the offence under Section 411 of the IPC
India Law Library Docid # 1873256

(194) HARLAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN, THROUGH PP AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023
By way of filing the instant Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397/401 CrPC, challenge has been made to the judgment dated 23.11.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sardarshahar in Criminal appeal No.15/2022 whereby the learned Judge affirmed the judgment of conviction dated 22.08.2022 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Sardarshahar in Criminal Regular Case No. 7/2015 (CIS No.108/2015)
India Law Library Docid # 1873258

(195) HARBANSH SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 02-05-2023

India Law Library Docid # 1873403

(196) GUDDU AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN, THROUGH PP AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 02-05-2023
These criminal appeals under Section 14-A (2) of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been filed in connection with FIR No.97/2023 registered at Police Station Mania, District Dholpur for the offence under Section(s) 143, 323, 341, 504, 506 & 325 of IPC and under Section(s) 3(1)(r)(s) & 3(2)(va) of the Act of 1989.
India Law Library Docid # 1873413

(197) BALWANT RAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023
Instant misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C against the order dated 21.02.2019 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gharsana, District Sriganganagar whereby , the learned revisional court dismissed the revision petition and affirmed the order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Gharsana dated 06.03.2018 allowing the application filed by prosecution under Section 65 of Evidence.
India Law Library Docid # 1873415

(198) JEENAT Vs. SATISH KUMAR TEPAN [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 02-05-2023
The instant appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (afterwards referred as 'Act of 1988') has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and award dated 14.02.2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, Jaipur Metro, Jaipur (afterwards referred as 'Tribunal') in MAC Case No.911/2019, whereby, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 3,48,000/- as compensation.
India Law Library Docid # 1873534

(199) LRS OF MANOHAR LAL AND OTHERS Vs. PREM CHAND AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023
The present regular appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 06.01.2012 passed in Civil Suit No.28/2011 by District Judge, Doongarpur whereby the suit for pre-emption as preferred by the plaintiffs under Section 11 of the Rajasthan Pre-emption Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1966') has been dismissed.
India Law Library Docid # 1873535

(200) SMT. PRITI AND OTHERS Vs. MOOLCHAND AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 02-05-2023

India Law Library Docid # 1873542