ive
India Law Library (Website) is free for India Law Library Offline customers only, Please Don't Pay for this website.

User not Logged..
IP Address :34.231.247.88
Latest Cases

(1) AJAY KUMAR @ KALA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 19-04-2022
Bail petitioners, namely Ajay Kumar @ Kala and Bihari Lal, who are behind the bars since 30.9.2021 have approached this court in the instant proceedings filed under S. 439 Cr.P.C, for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 75 of 2021, dated 18.9.2021, registered at Police Station Lambagaon, District Kanga, Himachal Pradesh under Ss. 376(1), 376(D), 354, 120-B, 201 of IPC, Ss. 6 and 17 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, Section 181 of Motor Vehicles Act and Sections 3(i)(w)(i)(ii)

(2) JOGINDER @ ABHISHEK Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 19-04-2022
Petitioner has approached this Court, invoking provisions of Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 54 of 2020, dated 14.10.2020, registered in Police Station Nankhari, District Shimla, H.P., under Sections 363, 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC') and Sections 6 and 12 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as 'POCSO Act').

(3) SUSMITA SAHA DUTTA AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 19-04-2022
Learned Additional Solicitor General has referred to the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the CBI and has pointed out that in CAN 5 of 2022 certain incorrect factual averments were inadvertently made which need to be corrected. He has submitted that in paragraph 3 (a) of the application it was inadvertently mentioned at Serial No.3 of the tabular list that a case was registered on receipt of complaint from individual complaints, though they did not figure in the NHRC Report, but later,

(4) VIJAY KALIA Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 13-04-2022
The grievance of the petitioner is that impugned transfer order dated 7.7.2021, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Civil Hospital, Indora, District Kangra, H.P. to Dr. RPGMC&H, Tanda, District Kangra, H.P is vitiated on the grounds firstly that petitioner was transferred within a short span of less than five months, secondly, the transfer was on the basis of D.O. Note, thirdly, the impugned order was in violation of the "Comprehensive Guiding Principles-2013" inasmuch as respondent

(5) VIPASA Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 12-04-2022
Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 25.11.2021, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Kasauli, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh, whereby an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C, having been filed by the petitioner- complainant(hereinafter referred to as the complainant), came to be dismissed, complainant has approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C, praying therein to quash and set-aside the aforesaid

(6) ADANI POWER LIMITED Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 12-04-2022
Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with issuance of communication dated 7.12.2017 (Annexure-R)(page-187), issued by the Special Secretary (Power) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, whereby the petitioner came to be apprised that due to various legal intricacies and contractual complications involved in the matter, the Council of Ministers has reconsidered and reviewed the decision taken in its meeting held on 4.9.2015, to refund the amount of upfront premium deposited by the petitioner for Jan

(7) REKESH KUMAR Vs. LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR- CUM-SUB DIVISION OFFICE [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-04-2022
By way of instant petition, petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- That the impugned order Annexure P-3 dated 30.7.2018 may kindly be quashed and set aside and proceed further in the case. That respondent may kindly be directed to make inquires with respect to deceased respondents before Reference Court and submit reference for adjudication on merits in time bound manner".

(8) ROOP CHAND Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 07-04-2022
By way of instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the grant of following relief:- That the notification dated 24.03.2022 (Annexure P/1) issued by the respondent No.1, being unconstitutional, discriminatory, arbitrary, unreasonable, unjustified and contrary to the transfer policy, may kindly be quashed and the respondents may please be directed to allow the petitioner to work as Assistant Engineer at HPPWD Sub Division, Bir, Kangra, H.P."

(9) ASHOK KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 07-04-2022
Ashok Kumar and Ramesh Chand were jointly tried for commission of offence under Section 20 of the NDPS Act in Sessions Trial No. 13-S/7 of 2008 by learned Special Judge II, Solan. Both were convicted for said offence and were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for two years each with fine of Rs. 40,000/- each and in default of payment of fine to further undergo imprisonment for six months each. While passing the aforesaid sentence learned Special Judge has recorded reasons as under:

(10) SHRI CHET RAM Vs. MANAGING DIRECTOR, H.P. STATE COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-04-2022
By way of instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- i) That a writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued quashing letter/Memo dated 10.03.2022 (Annexure P-2) and Memo dated 14.03.2022 (Annexure P-3) and respondents may kindly be directed to recover the amount from the pension of the petitioner or by way of other mode.

(11) SHIMLA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-04-2022
These matters have been referred to the Full Bench by order of the Division Bench dated 10.1.2020, in view of the conflict of opinion between the Division Bench judgment of this Court dated 20.9.2010 in CWP No. 5728 of 2010, titled H.P. B.Ed College Association and ors. vs. State of H.P. & anr., and another Division Bench judgment dated 23.7.2014 in CWP No. 7688 of 2013 titled HP Private Universities Management Association (H­ PUMA) vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others and CWP No. 840 of 201

(12) UMESH THAKUR Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 05-04-2022
Petitioner asserts his claim to the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (Pharmacist) on the ground that the sole candidate in the merit list did not join the post in question, therefore, petitioner having been placed in the 'extended list' deserved to be offered appointment on the said post.

(13) BHAJAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 04-04-2022
Petitioner is an accused in case FIR No. 5/2022, dated 16.01.2022, under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code ( for short 'IPC') and Section 4 & 6 of Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act (for short 'POCSO Act'),registered at Police Station Nankhari, Tehsil Nankhari, Distt. Shimla, H.P.

(14) DALIP SINGH Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 04-04-2022
Petitioner is accused in case FIR No.98 of 2021, dated 1st June, 2021, under Sections 18, 25 and 29 of the the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act'), registered at Police Station Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P. Petitioner was arrested in the above noted case on 1st June, 2021, and is in custody since then.

(15) DHARMA DEVI Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 04-04-2022
Petitioner is an accused in case FIR No. 16/2021, dated 24.02.2021, under Sections 20 and 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ( for short "ND&PS Act"), registered at Police Station Swarghat, District Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh.

(16) AJAY SHARMA Vs. YASHWANT SINGH PARMAR AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 02-04-2022
Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture &Forestry, Nauni, District Solan, H.P. (for short the University), issued advertisement No.07 of 2008 dated 6.8.2008, (for short, "advertisement"), inviting applications for 46 posts of Assistant Scientist/Assistant Professor/Assistant Extension Specialist/ Equivalent in the UGC Scale of 8000- 13500 in various disciplines, including Entomology and Apiculture. The subject matter of present lis pertains only to two posts advertised in the Depart

(17) EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CPWD DIVISION Vs. ASSESSING AUTHORITY, SHIMLA DISTRICT AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 02-04-2022
The petitioner, in execution of its work -contracts, supplied steel to the contractors. The Assessing Authority, Shimla vide order dated 12.02.2001 burdened the petitioner with sales tax liability to the tune of Rs.10,82,953/- for the years 1995-96, 1996- 97 and 1997-98 by treating supply of steel to the contractors as sale. Petitioner assailed the aforesaid order of Assessing Authority before the Additional Excise & Taxation Commissioner-cum- Appellate Authority (South Zone), Himachal Pradesh,

(18) STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS Vs. HARISH KUMAR AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 02-04-2022
Vide order dated 27.11.2017 passed in O.A. No. 3226 of 2016 and other connected matters, learned erstwhile H.P. State Administrative Tribunal allowed the petition filed by respondent No. 1 holding that cut-off date mentioned in the advertisement for determining the eligibility of candidates applying against Home Guards Volunteers quota, could not be subsequently altered by the State. Direction was issued to the competent authority to consider the respective cases of three original applicants (re

(19) BUDHI SINGH Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 02-04-2022
The instant petition has been filed for the grant of following relief(s): That the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the benefits of full pension to the applicant from the date of retirement i.e. 30.4.2002 as per the recommendations of sixth pay commission and which has been accepted by the State Govt. also.

(20) SUKH DASS Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 01-04-2022
Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in complaint case No. 4 of 2021, under Sections 18-A and 18-C of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, pending before learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.

IP Address :34.231.247.88