ive
India Law Library (Website) is free for India Law Library Offline customers only, Please Don't Pay for this website.

User not Logged..
IP Address :18.205.66.93
Latest Cases

(1) VINOD KUMAR Vs. CHARANJIT SINGH AND OTHERS [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] RS--1-43-2
By way of present appeal, challenge has been made to judgment and decree dated 09.10.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar, thereby modifying the judgment and decree dated 13.10.2014 passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rupnagar.
India Law Library Docid # 1856143

(2) SIMARANPREET KAUR @ SIMARJEET KAUR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 22-26-
Prayer in the present petition is for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.272 dated 5.12.2021, registered under Sections 307, 365, 323, 447, 148, 149, 120-B IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54 of Arms Act, 1959, at Police Station Tanda, District Hoshiarpur.
India Law Library Docid # 1856220

(3) ARC BIO FUEL PVT. LTD. Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 22-25-
The instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari seeking quashing of the order dated 25.4.2018 passed by the Commissioner, Patiala, Division, Patiala-respondent No.2 by which the appeal filed by the respondent-State was allowed and the case was remanded back to the District Collector, Barnala, with a direction to decide the same afresh.
India Law Library Docid # 1856275

(4) AVTAR SINGH SANGHA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 22-25-
The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.61, dated 14.4.2022, registered under Section 18 of NDPS Act (Section 29 NDPS Act added later on) at Police Station Baghapurana, District Moga.
India Law Library Docid # 1856283

(5) SURJIT SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 22-24-
The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in a case registered vide FIR No. 01 dated 30.11.2017 at Police Station S.S.O.C. District Fazilka under Sections 18, 21, 25, 29, 30 of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act and Sections 66-D and 66-F of Information Technology Act, 2000.
India Law Library Docid # 1856289

(6) VIRENDRA CHAKRAVERTI Vs. SECRETARY THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH URBAN ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) [MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 14-02-2023
Precisely stated, facts of the case are that petitioner was appointed on 12.02.1986 on the post of Cashier (Assistant Grade-III) in office of Municipality, Raisen (respondent No.6 herein). Respondent No.8 (private respondent) was appointed on 12.09.1995 on the post of (Assistant Grade-III). In April 2000, service of petitioner was attached with the office of District Urban Development Authority (Project), Raisen
India Law Library Docid # 1602764

(7) SMT. ZEHRA VICTOR Vs. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI (DELHI) AND OTHERS [MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (BENCH INDORE)] 31-01-2023
Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 4 and 5B - Order of demolition - Eviction Notice - Respondents have neither issued any notice to the petitioner nor granted her opportunity of hearing nor passed any order of demolition - Opportunity of hearing has not been granted to the petitioner which amounts to violation of the principles of natural justice - The Respondents are directed to open the lock of the premises in question forthwith and handover the possessio
India Law Library Docid # 1602659

(8) SHRI HEMANTKUMAR SADANAND NAIK GAONKAR Vs. PIO ROGERIO SALEM COTTA [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 02-01-2023
Petitioners are the original defendant No.4 and 5 in the said suit. Respondent No.1 filed the said suit against the other respondents and the petitioner herein for declaration, permanent injunction and specific performance. The said suit was registered as Regular Civil Suit No.129 of 2010. The present petitioners/defendants No.4 and 5 filed their counter claim dtd. 05/01/2019. Other respondents/defendants filed their written submissions. After the trial was concluded, the learned Judge placed th
India Law Library Docid # 1855115

(9) M.L.RAVI Vs. ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU, SECRETARIAT AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 21-12-2022
This Writ Petition is filed challenging GO.Ms.No.52, dated 06.10.2022 issued by the 1st respondent, in and by which, the Government has conveyed its approval directing that a notification under Section 7 of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 (Central Act 18 of 2016), (hereinafter the "Aadhaar Act") for use of Aadhaar Authentication services in the 2nd respondent corporation namely, TANGEDCO, to be published in the extraordinary issue
India Law Library Docid # 1854961

(10) METRO ORTEM LTD Vs. MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 21-12-2022
That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to call for the records and proceedings of Notice of Motion No.1707 of 2019 and Application at Exhibit "4" in Commercial Suit No. 3 of 2019 pending before the Hon'ble City Civil Court at Mumbai and on appreciating the merit of the same be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned Order dtd. 08/04/2021 passed in Application at Exhibit "4", on such terms and conditions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit
India Law Library Docid # 1855116

(11) HERMANDO DE SOUZA (DECEASED) BY LRS Vs. AGOSTINHO JUAS TADEU DE MENEZES AND ANOTHER [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 21-12-2022
The Original tenant is before this Court challenging concurrent orders passed by the Rent Controller and the District Court, whereby eviction
India Law Library Docid # 1846943

(12) NISHANT MUTTREJA & SUSHANT MUTTREJA Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI [DELHI HIGH COURT] 16-12-2022
It is submitted the applicant has been roped in the FIRs for the sole reason they were discharging their duties in the capacity as directors but now have spent about five to six years in imprisonment in each FIR. It is stated under Section 420 IPC the imprisonment is extendable upto seven years; under Section 406 IPC the imprisonment is extendable upto three years with fine and for the offences under Section 409 IPC the imprisonment is extendable upto ten years plus fine or life.
India Law Library Docid # 1856127

(13) DR.T.PARTHASARATHY Vs. MRS.K.SARALA [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 12-12-2022
The Revision Petitioner is the tenant and respondent in RLTOP.No.348 of 2021. The respondent/Landlord filed an application for eviction and for delivery of possession. The revision petitioner has taken a portion of the property belongs to the respondent/Landlord for running his clinic. The allegation against the revision petitioner is that he has not paid the rent properly and at one point of time, he stopped paying the rent. As and when the demand is made, the revision petitioner assured paymen
India Law Library Docid # 1854956

(14) SOW. LAXMIBAI VISHWANATH GAWARE Vs. STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 12-12-2022
The petitioner is challenging the order dtd. 6/12/2022 passed by the respondent no.2 District Election Officer (APMC) and District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies Hingoli in Appeal No.2/2022 and the order dtd. 25/11/2022 passed by the respondent no. 3 - Returning Officer, Agricultural Produce Market Committee [for short" AMPC"], Vasmat, rejecting the nomination form of the petitioner to contest the election of APMC, Vasmat from VJNT Category.
India Law Library Docid # 1855185

(15) SH. SHAHID HUSSAIN Vs. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) [DELHI HIGH COURT] 12-12-2022
The present bail application has been filed under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR bearing No. 0007/2022 registered under section 3 Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 at P.S. RPF, Tughlakabad. Vide order of this Court dated 09.11.2022 the petitioner was directed to join the investigation at PS RPF, Tughlakabad on 10.11.2022 at 10:00 AM and on subsequent dates as and when directed by the concerned IO.
India Law Library Docid # 1856136

(16) M.VENKATESAN Vs. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION) REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, NO.63/40 PERUMAL KOIL STREET, TINDIVANAM AND OTHERS [MADRAS HIGH COURT] 09-12-2022
The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondents pertaining to the order of the 2nd respondent in Memorandum No.11/2022 dated 03.10.2022 and quash the same, and consequently directing the 2nd respondent herein to forthwith register the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2010 in O.S.No.407 of 2006 on the file of District Munsif Court, Tindivanam ending with the judgment and decree dated 29.11.2012 in S.A.No.15 of 2012 on the file this H
India Law Library Docid # 1854960

(17) GANGADHARRAO CHITNAVIS MEMORIAL MEDICAL RESEARCH TRUST Vs. NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 09-12-2022
The petition challenges demand notice dtd. 17/7/2019 whereby the respondent levied various charges including development charge on the building and land of the petitioner. The thrust of grievances in this writ petition is about levy of the development charge on the developed land of the petitioner.
India Law Library Docid # 1855178

(18) PURSHOTAM VISHANDAS RAHEJA Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 09-12-2022
By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus against the respondents to forthwith withdraw the acquisition proceedings initiated by Notification dtd. 22/7/2004 in respect of the petitioner's land and to forthwith allow the petitioner to develop the petitioner's land on the basis of lapse of reservation
India Law Library Docid # 1855118

(19) ANUP DISALVA Vs. UNION OF INDIA [KERALA HIGH COURT] 09-12-2022
What God has joined together, let no one separate " is the sublime ideal read in the Bible (Matthew 19:6, Mark 10:9). Do spouses in that union have the right to separate their marriage, mutually, before the aura of the marriage period of one year vanishes, is the question presented in these matters. Two young Christians are before us. Their marriage was solemnized on 30/1/2022, in accordance with the Christian rites and ceremonies. They realised that their marriage was a mistake. The marriage wa
India Law Library Docid # 1855546

(20) SMT. PAWAN KANWAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS [RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 09-12-2022
The petitioner is an elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Chhodia through election held on 24.09.2020. She has filed this writ petition being aggrieved with no confidence proceedings initiated against her by the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaisalmer pursuant to the notice of no confidence motion submitted by the Members of the Gram Panchayat. The meeting for consideration of no confidence motion is scheduled to be held on 09.12.2022.
India Law Library Docid # 1856376

IP Address :18.205.66.93