ive
India Law Library (Website) is free for India Law Library Offline customers only, Please Don't Pay for this website.

User not Logged..
IP Address :3.215.190.193
Latest Cases

(1) SUSHANTA KUMAR BANIK Vs. STATE OF TRIPURA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 30-09-2022
Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Section 3(1) - Delay in passing of detention order - Delay in passing the order of detention from the date of proposal thereby snapping the "live and proximate link" between the prejudicial activities and the purpose of detention & failure on the part of the detaining authority in explaining such delay in any manner.
India Law Library Docid # 1602148

(2) X Vs. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 29-09-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 21 - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Section 3(2)(b) - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003 - Rule 3(2)b - Termination of Pregnancy - All women, married or unmarried, are entitled to safe and legal abortion - Object of Section 3(2)(b) of the MTP Act read with Rule 3B is to provide for abortions between twenty and twenty-four weeks, rendered unwanted due to a change in the material circumstances of women - In view of the object, t
India Law Library Docid # 1602142

(3) M/S. JINDAL STEEL AND POWER LIMITED Vs. THE CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 29-09-2022
These Civil Appeals filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 arise out of common impugned Judgment dated 07.05.2008 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi ('Appellate Tribunal', for short). By the said judgment, the Appellate Tribunal has set aside the order of respondent No. 1 dated 29.11.2005 and cancelled the distribution licence granted to the appellant in C.A. Nos. 3607-3610 of 2008. Hence, these appeals.
India Law Library Docid # 1602143

(4) NIRENDRA NATH KAR Vs. GOPAL NAVIN BHAI DAVE AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 29-09-2022
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3 and 560(5) - Striking off name of company - Defunct company - As per the last balance sheet filed for the year 2002­2003, the paid up share capital of the Company in question was Rs.7,000/­ and if that is being taken at the face value which is supported by documentary evidence on record, as per the scheme of Section 3 of the Act 1956, the Company is deemed to be a defunct company -
India Law Library Docid # 1602144

(5) SUKHBIRI DEVI AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 29-09-2022
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) - Order 14 Rule 2(2) - Preliminary Issue - Limitation - Determination of - Issue limitation can be framed and determined as a preliminary issue under Order XIV, Rule 2(2)(b), CPC in a case where it can be decided on admitted facts - Though, limitation is a mixed question of law and facts it will shed the said character and would get confined to one of question of law when the foundational fact(s), determining the starting point of limitation is vividly and specif
India Law Library Docid # 1602145

(6) CHOTKAU Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 28-09-2022
Convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short "IPC") and sentenced to death by the Sessions Court, which was also confirmed by the High Court on a reference and an appeal, the sole accused has come up with the above appeals.
India Law Library Docid # 1602141

(7) ANJU GARG AND ANOTHER Vs. DEEPAK KUMAR GARG [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 28-09-2022
The appellants herein are the wife and the son of the respondent. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 10th September 2018 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Revision No. 05/2017, whereby the High Court has dismissed the Revision application filed by the appellants, challenging the order passed by the District Judge, Family Court-1, Faridabad, Haryana (hereinafter referred to as the "Family Court").
India Law Library Docid # 1602146

(8) RAM KUMAR Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 28-09-2022
This appeal challenges the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 21st February 2019 thereby allowing the writ petition filed by respondent No. 9 herein, setting aside the order dated 18th November 2017 passed by the Deputy Collector, Rasoolabad cancelling the fair price shop licence of respondent No. 9 and the order dated 20th July 2018 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Kanpur Division, Kanpur, (hereinafter referred to as "the Appellate Authority")
India Law Library Docid # 1602147

(9) MORESHAR YADAORAO MAHAJAN Vs. VYANKATESH SITARAM BHEDI (D) THR. LRS. AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 27-09-2022
Title Suit - Determination of necessary party - Whether a person who claims independent title and possession adversely to the title of a vendor could be a necessary party or not - Held, two tests are to be satisfied for determining the question who is a necessary party. Tests are: (1) there must be a right to some relief against such party in respect of the controversies involved in the proceedings; (2) no effective decree can be passed in the absence of such party.
India Law Library Docid # 1602139

(10) KOLLI SATYANARAYANA (DEAD) BY LRS. Vs. VALURIPALLI KESAVA RAO CHOWDARY (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 27-09-2022
Decree for specific performance - Agreement of sale provided that in the event the permission was not obtained within 75 days, the purchaser shall be entitled to get back his advance money paid after 75 days but not later than 90 days under any circumstances, the findings of the learned Single Judge cannot be said to be erroneous - After the defendant terminated the agreement on 12th April 1982 stating therein that since the permission from the ULC Authorities could not be obtained, she had canc
India Law Library Docid # 1602140

(11) JAGDISH PRASAD SAINI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 26-09-2022
Service Law - Leave encashment is part of the salary - Management establishment was recipient of 70% aid, in the form of grant - In these circumstances, the State cannot shrug its responsibility to shoulder its part of the responsibility to pay the appellants the share of leave encashment benefits, and hide behind either Rule 5 (viii) or the undertaking executed by them - Appellants are held entitled to privilege leave entitlement benefits - Such benefit shall be calculated from the date they en
India Law Library Docid # 1602131

(12) BALKRISHNA RAMA TARLE DEAD THR LRS AND ANOTHER Vs. PHOENIX ARC PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 26-09-2022
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Section 14 - Powers exercisable by District Magistrate (DM)/Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act are ministerial step and Section 14 does not involve any adjudicatory process qua points raised by the borrowers against the secured creditor taking possession of the secured assets.
India Law Library Docid # 1602132

(13) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. SHIV KUMAR AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 26-09-2022
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(1)(a) - Under the provisions of Section 24(1)(a) in case the award is not made as on 1-1.2014, the date of commencement of the 2013 Act, there is no lapse of proceedings. Compensation has to be determined under the provision of the 2013 Act.
India Law Library Docid # 1602133

(14) JAGDISH PRASAD SAINI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 26-09-2022
The appellants were appointed against sanctioned posts by the fourth respondent (a senior secondary school, established and controlled by the fifth respondent trust, hereafter referred to collectively as the "establishment") in 1993. They continued to work uninterruptedly in that establishment on a regular basis. The establishment was recipient of grant-in-aid from the State of Rajasthan (hereafter, "State"). By a unilateral resolution dated 5th November 2008, the managing committee of the estab
India Law Library Docid # 1602135

(15) K. MADAN MOHAN RAO Vs. BHEEMRAO BASWANTHRAO PATIL AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 26-09-2022
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) - Order 7 Rule 11 - Rejection of Plaint - Order have been passed by the High Court in disposal of the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, deserves to be disapproved only for the reason that even until this date, the reasons for the said order are not available with either of the parties nor are available on the website of the High Court nor the copy of the order has been supplied despite the parties having made the applications seeking certified copy of the
India Law Library Docid # 1602138

(16) SATISH CHANDRA YADAV Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 26-09-2022
Service Law - If it is found that the employee had suppressed or given false information in regard to the matters having a bearing on his fitness or suitability to the post, he can be terminated from service.
India Law Library Docid # 1602134

(17) OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL M.V. POLARIS GALAXY Vs. BANQUE CANTONALE DE GENEVE [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-09-2022
Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017 - Sections 12 and 14 - Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) - Order 43 Rule 1 - An appeal does not lie to the Commercial Appellate Division of the High Court from an order of the Commercial Division (Single Bench) of the same High Court for addition of a party in an admiralty suit governed by the Admiralty Act. - If such an order under the Code of Civil Procedure which does not fall under Order XLIII of CPC is held to be appealable
India Law Library Docid # 1602111

(18) SMT. SULAKSHNA Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-09-2022
Consumer - Insurance - Death in road accident - Insured shall be entitled to the amount insured under the policies for which the amount of premium was already paid prior to the death of the insured.
India Law Library Docid # 1602113

(19) UNION OF INDIA AND OTHER Vs. G.R. MEGHWAL [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-09-2022
Service Law - Representation to General Manager - Respondent was graded as "Very Good" in the ACRs for the years 2005-2006 and 2006- 2007 and was graded only "Good" in the ACR for the year 2007-2008 by the very same reporting and reviewing officer, despite the fact that specifically the respondent was given the opportunity against the ACR for the year 2007-2008 - However, no valid reasons are given for rejecting the representation - Tribunal and the High Court have not committed any error in dir
India Law Library Docid # 1602114

(20) HARPAL SINGH AND ANR. ETC. ETC. Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB ETC. ETC. [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-09-2022
Acquisition of land - Compensation - There is a substantial delay in preferring the first appeals - It appropriate to deny the statutory benefits including interest on the enhanced amount of compensation from the date of the judgment/s and order/s passed by the High Court till the present appeals (special leave petitions) have been preferred before this Court.
India Law Library Docid # 1602115

IP Address :3.215.190.193