ive
India Law Library (Website) is free for India Law Library Offline customers only, Please Don't Pay for this website.

User not Logged..
IP Address :44.212.99.248
Latest Cases

(1) ELUMALAI @ VENKATESAN AND ANOTHER Vs. M. KAMALA AND OTHERS AND ETC. [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-01-2023
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 8(a) - Estoppel - Mere spec successonis or expectation his conduct in transferring/releasing his rights for valuable consideration, would give rise to an estoppel - Effect of the estoppel cannot be warded off by persons claiming through the person whose conduct has generated the estoppel.
India Law Library Docid # 1602619

(2) DEVELOPER GROUP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SURINDER SINGH MARWAH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-01-2023
Injunction - While passing an order of injunction, the Courts are required to be guided by the principles of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury - A blanket order directing maintenance of status quo in respect of the all 11 properties admeasuring 115 acres is not justified
India Law Library Docid # 1602620

(3) BAHARUL ISLAM AND OTHERS Vs. THE INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-01-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Entry 25 of List I and Entry 25 of List III - Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004 - Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004 permits Diploma holders to practise 'medicine', i.e., allopathic medicine, in rural areas of Assam is declared to be null and void - A State Legislature has no legislative competence to enact a law in respect of modern medicine or allopathic medicine contrary to the said standards that have been determined by the Central
India Law Library Docid # 1602615

(4) MUNNA LAL Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-01-2023
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 302 - Murder - Acquittal - Delay of 24 days in recording the statement of witness - Mere failure/neglect to effect seizure of the weapon(s) cannot be the sole reason for discarding the prosecution case but the same assumes importance on the face of the oral testimony of the so-called eyewitnesses, not being found - Missing links could have been provided by the Investigating Officer who, again, did not enter the witness box - No weapon of offence was seized, no ba
India Law Library Docid # 1602616

(5) PRASAD PRADHAN AND ANOTHER @.APPELLANT Vs. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-01-2023
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 302 read with 34 - Murder - Conviction and sentence - Appeal against - Appellants attacked the deceased, with axes on the head, which is a vital part of the body - Deceased was unarmed - During the attack, the victim’s daughter reached the spot, and tried to dissuade the appellants - Appellants continued their assault on the victim and also attacked the witness with an axe - Since three injuries sustained by the appellant, were on the head, he fell down - Provisi
India Law Library Docid # 1602617

(6) FISHERMAN CARE, REGISTERED ASSOCIATION Vs. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, DAIRYING AND FISHERIES REP. BY ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-01-2023
Marine Products Export Development Authority Act, 1972 - Section 11 - Purse Seine Fishing beyond the territorial waters of Tamil Nadu - Conditions:
India Law Library Docid # 1602618

(7) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. RAJESH DUA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Appeal against - Compensation with respect to the land in question was deposited in the Reference Court in the year 1967 and that between 1967 and 2017, nothing is on record to show that the writ petitioners were praying and/or a grievance was made by the original landowners with respect to nonpayment of compensation and that the possessi
India Law Library Docid # 1602599

(8) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. ASHA PRAKASH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Appeal against - Subsequent purchaser has no locus to challenge the acquisition / lapse of acquisition - High Court has committed a grave error in entertaining the writ petition preferred by the respondent, who is a subsequent purchaser praying for deemed lapse of acquisition - Impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is unsus
India Law Library Docid # 1602600

(9) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. SHYAMO AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Appeal against - When the possession of the land in question was taken over by drawing the panchnama and preparing the possession proceedings and the same was handed over to the DDA and that the original writ petitioner was not the recorded owner and therefore there was no question of tendering any compensation to him at the relevant time
India Law Library Docid # 1602601

(10) THE ARUNACHAL PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANOTHER Vs. MISS HAGE MAMUNG AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Education - Examination - Re-evaluation of papers - Public Service Commission - As per clause 38(v) of the Guidelines 2017, where in the question in the examination paper itself is wrong and thus could not possible be evaluated to have correct answer, there may be deletion of such incorrect questions and the consequent pro-rata distribution of the marks allocated to them - Applying the same analogy with respect to wrong answer keys and thereafter when a conscious decision was taken to allocate t
India Law Library Docid # 1602602

(11) THE SECRETARY, LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHER Vs. OM PRAKASH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Twin conditions - For attracting Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013, twin conditions of not taking possession and not tendering compensation have to be satisfied - It is observed and held that if one of the conditions is not satisfied, there shall not be any lapse under Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013.
India Law Library Docid # 1602603

(12) THE ESI CORPORATION Vs. M/S. RADHIKA THEATRE [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Section 1(6) - Demand notice - Sub-section (6) of Section 1 therefore, shall be applicable even with respect to those establishments, established prior to 31.03.1989/20.10.1989 and the ESI Act shall be applicable irrespective of the number of persons employed or notwithstanding that the number of persons employed at any time falls below the limit specified by or under the ESI Act.
India Law Library Docid # 1602604

(13) MANUBHAI SENDHABHAI BHARWAD AND ANOTHER Vs. OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 300A - Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 35 - Temporary acquisition - If the land is continued to be under temporary acquisition for number of years, meaning and purpose of temporary acquisition would lose its significance
India Law Library Docid # 1602605

(14) GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI Vs. RATIRAM AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Appeal against - High Court has declared that the acquisition with respect to the land in question is deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013 relying upon the decision of this Court in the case of Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors., (2014) 3 SCC 183 and other decisions and sole
India Law Library Docid # 1602606

(15) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. NEM CHAND SHARMA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Twin conditions - For attracting the provisions of Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013, twin conditions of not taking over of possession and not tendering/paying the compensation are to be satisfied and if one of the conditions is not satisfied, there shall not be any deemed lapse of acquisition.
India Law Library Docid # 1602607

(16) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. DEWAN CHAND PRUTHI AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Once having obtained the stay against the dispossession and due to which the acquiring body / beneficiary could not have taken the possession, thereafter, it is not open for the landowner to contend that as the possession is not taken, he is entitled to the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013.
India Law Library Docid # 1602608

(17) GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER Vs. RATI RAM AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Appeal against - Relying upon the decision of this Court in the case of Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors., (2014) 3 SCC 183, the High Court has allowed the writ petition and has declared that the acquisition with respect to the land in question is deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the
India Law Library Docid # 1602609

(18) SAURAV DAS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 173 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74, 75 and 76 - Chargesheet is not a "public document" - Documents mentioned in Section 74 of the Evidence Act only can be said to be public documents, the certified copies of which are to be given by the concerned police officer having the custody of such a public document. Copy of the chargesheet along with the necessary documents cannot be said to be public documents within the definition of Public Documents as
India Law Library Docid # 1602610

(19) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. RAMBIR AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 31(1) - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - In case a person has been tendered the compensation as provided under Section 31(1) of the 1894 Act, it is not open to him to claim that acquisition has lapsed under Section 24(2) due to non-payment or non-deposit of compensation in court.
India Law Library Docid # 1602593

(20) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. BHAGI SINGH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - High Court has declared that the acquisition with respect to the land in question is deemed to have lapsed on the ground that no physical possession was taken in respect of the suit land - Appeal against - When the possession of the land in question is held to have been taken over by the DDA through LAC/ L&B Department by drawing the panc
India Law Library Docid # 1602594

IP Address :44.212.99.248